I think limiting BCS visits would be difficult at any rate...Not entirely sure if we have a policy about that, considering our coach just started a few weeks ago. We had several commits reopen after our coaching change and we're still after several of those guys trying to get them back on board, but everything is naturally chaotic when you're bringing in a new staff and everybody on both sides is figuring out whether/how they continue to fit.
Coach Fitz will not accept san official visit from a kid who has verbaled another school, so whatever "committed" means in the parlance of our times, I guess Chee is not in the category at the moment.I think limiting BCS visits would be difficult at any rate...
Damn this honestly was the one I really wanted to hold on to. Obviously can't blame the kid, at least it wasn't Delaware. Best of luck, we hardly knew Chee...
What's your take on Chee? His tape looks good--very aggressive in run support and seems pretty athletic. They offered him as a SAM, so it's off to weight room and training table for him. He looks like his frame could add 25 lbs or pretty easily.Damn this honestly was the one I really wanted to hold on to. Obviously can't blame the kid, at least it wasn't Delaware. Best of luck, we hardly knew Chee...
This kid is shifty, and good speed. Would love this kid.New offer out. He committed to Fordham a month ago and was on a visit there this weekend.
You sound like an ass. These are 17/18 yr old kids. If I recall people commented in the past what a great kid he is and top notch player. Let's not start embarrassing ourselves because we are losing in the recruiting game right now. urfan1 is probably right about depth or maybe Russ' new offense is not for him. I don't wish any ill towards this kid, Chee, Thyrick, Page, Lachlan and the list goes on. There's a consistent message here that either DR setting the house on fire or something with this new staff/schemes aren't sitting well with these kids and their families. Be pissed at DR, he did this. Don't get me wrong, I can't wait to beat UD, WM and the pukes, but I'm not going to be a kid-hater.Let's make him regret it for each of the next 4 or 5 years. He sounds like a kid who needs to mature so that he can weigh his decisions. Hope that we can be a part of that metamorphosis.
And we are out here offering kids that are committed elsewhere and/or recruited by UTC after Russ said he wasn't going to do that. It's the nature of the beast. "Commit" in recruiting clearly doesn't mean what it should, but we have to remember coaches are shifting too. It always has a ripple effect. Go watch some UTC film. Their defense was stellar. We are going to upgrade significantly there. And alot of our recent recruits have been DBs. UTC's offense was fast paced, exciting and clearly effective, with as many high scoring games as they had. But, its very different from DR's and most of the kids we have lost have been on offense. There could be something there.not at all surprised by that one -- sorry to see him go but we are loaded at RB, I'm sure that was a factor
Meaning that those recruits aren't a good fit for the new offense? I would've thought someone like Nate Evans would be a great fit for the spread.And we are out here offering kids that are committed elsewhere and/or recruited by UTC after Russ said he wasn't going to do that. It's the nature of the beast. "Commit" in recruiting clearly doesn't mean what it should, but we have to remember coaches are shifting too. It always has a ripple effect. Go watch some UTC film. Their defense was stellar. We are going to upgrade significantly there. And alot of our recent recruits have been DBs. UTC's offense was fast paced, exciting and clearly effective, with as many high scoring games as they had. But, its very different from DR's and most of the kids we have lost have been on offense. There could be something there.
I would agree with you. He seems versatile, like he can run with power and catch the ball in open space, but who knows how Evans sees himself fitting in. There are more differences between DR and UTC's offense than just a spread. We normally had 1 RB in at a time. UTC has multiple backs in at once. Don't see TEs used much in the UTC offense and QB runs a lot. This has to be something these offensive guys are thinking about. Just my two cents.Meaning that those recruits aren't a good fit for the new offense? I would've thought someone like Nate Evans would be a great fit for the spread.