Re: Under cover of darkne$$, by all mean$ keep it flowing

[Anachnoid]

So why is disclosure of source of funds a bad idea?

I'd like to know who is bankrolling our candidates and why.

Macaca is for non disclosure

 

[WebSpinner]

if the dems are behind it, must be mudcat again trying to make everyone think that the repubs take money but the dems do not. this is politics pure and simple. the worse thing the senate ever did was create and pass mccain/feingold, that screwed the pooch and gave us this PAC mess.

 

[Anachnoid]

Well that dont make it right. How about gettin it fixed. Whats wrong with disclosure with enforced criminal consequences for violations?

 

[WebSpinner]

nobody up there wants this, a simple political ploy since the dems knew it would not pass. i do not care what they do, both parties and every candidate takes whatever money they can, heck obama took money from those evil, terrible BANE CAPITAL folks. this whole charade is a joke, do not be naive Noid.

 

[Anachnoid]

Excalibur has two sides, let it fly

 

[WebSpinner]

Noid, you should be able to scan all of this pre-election rhetoric and bull shit and know, both parties are at fault here and that should also show you that we do not need those bozos and their bureaucrat brothers running our healthcare or a lot of other things, they are liars, way too inefficient and wasteful. get them off our backs as much as we can is my motto.

This post was edited on 7/17 6:26 PM by WebSpinner

 

[Anachnoid]

Maybe George Wallace was on to sumpin in 1968 when he said something to the effect that he would throw the bureaucrats and their briefcases into the Potomac. Was it the EPA that stopped him?

 

[WebSpinner]

no, think it was someone with an unregistered handgun. he had it right though.