I didn’t get to watch or listen to the game, so it’s good to learn from this thread that we are completely horrid/full of potential/off to a great start/beyond hopeless. I am really looking forward to/dreading beyond belief watching Friday’s game!
Are you referring to our basketball team or our forum community?... it’s good to learn from this thread that we are completely horrid/full of potential/off to a great start/beyond hopeless.
Yes/yes/no/maybe.Are you referring to our basketball team or our forum community?
Bigelow showed some strong flashes and deserves a spot in the starting 5. Nelson had some good plays but made some mistakes and missed too many free throws, but if he cleans that up, he'll be at the top consistently. Burton largely struggled but made up some gap with his Double Double via the boards, time to get him aggressive. Quinn was efficient, though needs to take more chances.
Overall, much more positive start than previous years, bench looks deeper than years past as well
Here's a stat, and probably the only one that matters: the players responsible for 84% of the VMI minutes have 82 games of college experience (54 games by their lone senior! ). VMI probably wouldnt win the city high school basketball title, and you want to quote statistics?? I think we might be OK defensively but we're not good enough to hold many teams under 60 points - we have to score.I disagree with nearly everything on here.
1. I saw a lot to be excited about.
2. We are good, with a lot of upside.
3. Quinn was 3-3 with 7 Reb, 3 assists, and a block in 19 minutes.
4. "One dimensional" Roche had 3 rebounds, drew a charge, and blocked a shot.
5. I agree with your Bigelow comments, and I think this is the only thing I agree with, but then, in your criticism of Grace, you said Grace would start only because we had no one else. ?? Uh, this was right after you mentioned Bigelow.
6. I don't see us being offensively challenged at all.
7. I'm not worried about Goose and Tyler.
8. How did Dji, Randolph, and Nelson have more negatives than positives? I mean, my goodness, what game were you watching? Dji was 3-5, made a 3, and had 8 rebounds. His lone negative was 3 turnovers, which looking at how they were committed, he can clean up. Randolph made a 3, hit both his FTs, and had 0 turnovers out there. And Nelson played 28 minutes with 13 points, 3 assists, 2 steals, and 0 turnovers in his first game. His negative would be 2-8 at the line, which there is no doubt in my mind he can clean up. Nelson and Dji passed the PG test big time tonight, and it looks like we are in good shape at such an important position. More negatives than positives? All you are doing is showing your hate with that silly comment.
9. I agree with SDad with countering your "we are non athletic" talk.
10. We should be able to score enough inside this year, and we did some tonight. I think you are overreacting to one game as far as that is concerned.
11. I don't think Dayton, VCU, Loyola, will manhandle us. Far from it.
12. You are not trying to be negative? Seriously? Sure looks like you went out of your way to be negative, especially with your "Dji, Randolph, and Nelson had more negatives than positives" comment.
Here is my best line up:What lineups did you guys like the most or see that was more impactful than others?
No one brought it up because it's not true.I don’t know if anyone brought this up. But we got outrebounded by VMI. I wouldn’t feel too great about this.
I like that lineup a lot. I really like when Dji and JayNel play together. I totally agree about Zay and really is someone that reminds me of diamond in the ruff. I think that is probably our most athletic lineup as well.Here is my best line up:
Nelson, Dji, Burton, Bigelow, Grace. Bigelow needs to on the court A LOT and Dji and Nelson need to play together.
If you want to go a little smaller, sub Goose in for Grace, move Goose to the 3, Burton to the 4 and Bigelow inside. That is out most athletic line-up, designed to run the floor and play great defense.
MFG over Quinn?Here is my best line up:
Nelson, Dji, Burton, Bigelow, Grace. Bigelow needs to on the court A LOT and Dji and Nelson need to play together.
If you want to go a little smaller, sub Goose in for Grace, move Goose to the 3, Burton to the 4 and Bigelow inside. That is out most athletic line-up, designed to run the floor and play great defense.
I mentioned this early in the outlook thread but If Dji can give a little more scoring like around 10-12 and 8 rbs and some quality assists off the bench will def help us rebounding wise. He had 8 last night and for 17 min and being a guard is solid. Neal had 7, Matt needs to grab around 7-8 and Zay to get a few more and I think we can be a good rebounding team.No one brought it up because it's not true.
Spiders 44, Keydets 39.
And that's with VMI outrebounding us 8–1 in the first few minutes. We got it straightened out.
I don't want to be down on Quinn after just 1 game. But yes. I came away not impressed. I just don't think he is strong/athletic/quick enough to give us what we need in the A-10. I hope I am wrong because we really need Quinn to be able to be a force in this league.MFG over Quinn?
Quinn is better than Grace. he'll be fine.I don't want to be down on Quinn after just 1 game. But yes. I came away not impressed. I just don't think he is strong/athletic/quick enough to give us what we need in the A-10. I hope I am wrong because we really need Quinn to be able to be a force in this league.
MFG is kind of in there by default, but also became MFG understands Mooney's systems and is kind of the glue that is able to bind these new players and line-ups together.
Agreed, but Quinn is going to have much less of an impact than I think a lot of us anticipated.Quinn is better than Grace. he'll be fine.
I think Quinn will be fine...I def think we can make the adjustments with Matt if he is struggling.I think I agree with 97 - Quinn didn't look ready to play how we play. I like that lineup the best, with MFG serving in that facilitator role.
then some anticipated too much. I expect 10 ppg, 7 rpg, 4 apg. he's not a Grant Golden or TJ Cline running the floor, but he's a very good passing big man. his game at Lafayette is perfectly suited for our offense. he's not a low post dominant big. he predominantly plays the top of the key and handles the ball a lot making good decisions. and he's a lane clogger defensively.Agreed, but Quinn is going to have much less of an impact than I think a lot of us anticipated.
Agree herethen some anticipated too much. I expect 10 ppg, 7 rpg, 4 apg. he's not a Grant Golden or TJ Cline running the floor, but he's a very good passing big man. his game at Lafayette is perfectly suited for our offense. he's not a low post dominant big. he predominantly plays the top of the key and handles the ball a lot making good decisions. and he's a lane clogger defensively.
Well played...Just realized the men and women both won by identical 69–48 scores…nice.
I hope you are right. I should be more hesitant in making proclamations after 1 game, I just thought he was going to be more athletic than he is. I do like his height and length and maybe he can be a better rim protector than we had with Grant.I think Quinn will be fine...I def think we can make the adjustments with Matt if he is struggling.
Yea I figured it was something like that. Unfortunately I missed the game thanks to an outpatient procedure so I wasn’t sure but the highlights his athleticism looked kinda similar to TJ his first year he redshirted here.I don't want to be down on Quinn after just 1 game. But yes. I came away not impressed. I just don't think he is strong/athletic/quick enough to give us what we need in the A-10. I hope I am wrong because we really need Quinn to be able to be a force in this league.
MFG is kind of in there by default, but also became MFG understands Mooney's systems and is kind of the glue that is able to bind these new players and line-ups together.
I do think we should look to post him a little more on the block. I think we tried that a little more in the 2nd. But it is one game and looking at Neal, he is athletically what we saw last night. I do think once he gets more comfortable with the system he will be better and has to be. We can't compare him to others just let him be who he is. He can pass, he can rebound, we know he can score around the rim. I thought we missed him a couple times when he had a much smaller guy on him...If the pass did go into him it was late and allowed the help to come. Our guards have to see that much sooner. But again, one game is all it is. I'm just happy my guy was happy and healthy and played well minus the 3 TOs😞. 🕷️ 🏀 ✊I hope you are right. I should be more hesitant in making proclamations after 1 game, I just thought he was going to be more athletic than he is. I do like his height and length and maybe he can be a better rim protector than we had with Grant.
I liked Nelson and Dji on the court together. Brings a different pace that will help us against better teams. With that being said, the 2 of them combined for 4 assists and 3 turnovers. If these guys are our point guards (which they are) more play making and less turnovers.What lineups did you guys like the most or see that was more impactful than others?
Def agree the 3 TOs are on Dji for sure one bad pass the other was stolen off a rebound not sure about the other one but totally agree. Protect the basketball at cost. I think we will see improvement moving forward.I liked Nelson and Dji on the court together. Brings a different pace that will help us against better teams. With that being said, the 2 of them combined for 4 assists and 3 turnovers. If these guys are our point guards (which they are) more play making and less turnovers.
not a bad turnover count considering our own announcers still say we only have one true point guard on the roster!Def agree the 3 TOs are on Dji for sure one bad pass the other was stolen off a rebound not sure about the other one but totally agree. Protect the basketball at cost. I think we will see improvement moving forward.
The other one was when he drove and stepped on the baseline. That one and the one after the rebound happen sometimes. I don't see those happening often and don't think they will be an issue. The lobbed backcourt pass was the one I look at and say that shouldn't happen. But, overall I thought he looked good out there.Def agree the 3 TOs are on Dji for sure one bad pass the other was stolen off a rebound not sure about the other one but totally agree. Protect the basketball at cost. I think we will see improvement moving forward.
don't get me started 😂not a bad turnover count considering our own announcers still say we only have one true point guard on the roster!
Thats right...couldn't think of it. Agree about the lob...and we he came out to see us he already knew I was going to talk about it.😀 Appreciate it!The other one was when he drove and stepped on the baseline. That one and the one after the rebound happen sometimes. I don't see those happening often and don't think they will be an issue. The lobbed backcourt pass was the one I look at and say that shouldn't happen. But, overall I thought he looked good out there.
Sorry I was looking at the wrong stat. We got beat at the offensive rebounds. But not total reboundsNo one brought it up because it's not true.
Spiders 44, Keydets 39.
And that's with VMI outrebounding us 8–1 in the first few minutes. We got it straightened out.
They did have more offensive rebounds than we did (15–9), but of course they had a lot more opportunities than we did too...they missed 48 shots while we missed 28.
How could you not watch the first game? Your posting privileges have been revoked until you watch a game.I didn’t get to watch or listen to the game, so it’s good to learn from this thread that we are completely horrid/full of potential/off to a great start/beyond hopeless. I am really looking forward to/dreading beyond belief watching Friday’s game!