I would actually settle for a man made of fur at this point.
J New has a sweet fur coat.
I would actually settle for a man made of fur at this point.
We also played Furman in the Quarterfinals of the 2005 1-AA playoffs.And that shows your age, sport, and geographic location.
I believe we played them in football as a conference game from 1964-1977. Sometime in Greenville, SC (Not NC)
Do the FMM guys ever go to Spider Sportsline? I am thinking of heading over to Glory Days. Maybe they'd like to sell me a T-shirt while the show is on the air?
It's been 6 weeks since we won a home game. Our last home win was the barn burner over Coppin St. Good times for fans.We might get 12 wins this year. Way too many home losses this year. No game is a guarantee.
Had we told Ulla at the start of the 2018 season that we would be 19-31 over our next 50, I wonder what he would have said in that moment.Last 50 Spider bball games 19-31. Unacceptable. .38 win %. Nuff said.
#RollSpide ?????Had we told Ulla at the start of the 2018 season that we would be 19-31 over our next 50, I wonder what he would have said in that moment.
Why would you include the TCU game? I would have waited until after the Davidson game...Last 50 Spider bball games 19-31. Unacceptable. .38 win %. Nuff said.
Had we told Ulla at the start of the 2018 season that we would be 19-31 over our next 50, I wonder what he would have said in that moment.
This tweet is not going to endear O'Connor to Mooney. I think that there might be an underlying drum beat if you listen closely.
Do we get Steph Curry in ‘06?!?! Do I become best friends with Steph Curry at Richmond?!?!Yeah think you’re right on JOC.
Anyway re: McKillop I’m convinced we could have had him in 2002. Miller needed to push way harder on that one. It was there. Total screw up. McKillop would have best transition possible after Beilein due to style of play. Oh what could have been. His son was going to be a freshman at Davidson but so was Patrick Beilein here at UR then he went to wva with dad. As expected. Matt McKillop could have come to UR. Nobody would have minded. Timing was great. Now in 2005 no. His son was going into his senior year at Davidson he wasn’t going to leave then.
Good question. I'm done trying to play nostradamus of what Hardt is going to do, I just don't know.So im still speculating we are going to end up around 13-18 or so. My theory the last several years was three things could get CM fired: 1) some kind of academic/recruiting violation, 2) a personal problem injurious to URs brand, or 3) back to back losing seasons.
Several folks seem to think back to back losing seasons isn’t enough so it got me thinking. Is there a number of wins/losses that changes the calculus on this? For example, I think it would be virtually impossible to go winless the remainder of the season and retain him. 7-24 or whatever that is?
So taking out the reality of our upcoming matchups, is there a record that Hardt can’t ignore?
I can see UR going winless the rest of the season.So im still speculating we are going to end up around 13-18 or so. My theory the last several years was three things could get CM fired: 1) some kind of academic/recruiting violation, 2) a personal problem injurious to URs brand, or 3) back to back losing seasons.
Several folks seem to think back to back losing seasons isn’t enough so it got me thinking. Is there a number of wins/losses that changes the calculus on this? For example, I think it would be virtually impossible to go winless the remainder of the season and retain him. 7-24 or whatever that is?
So taking out the reality of our upcoming matchups, is there a record that Hardt can’t ignore?
So im still speculating we are going to end up around 13-18 or so. My theory the last several years was three things could get CM fired: 1) some kind of academic/recruiting violation, 2) a personal problem injurious to URs brand, or 3) back to back losing seasons.
Several folks seem to think back to back losing seasons isn’t enough so it got me thinking. Is there a number of wins/losses that changes the calculus on this? For example, I think it would be virtually impossible to go winless the remainder of the season and retain him. 7-24 or whatever that is?
So taking out the reality of our upcoming matchups, is there a record that Hardt can’t ignore?
Good question. I'm done trying to play nostradamus of what Hardt is going to do, I just don't know.
All I know is that if he can't look at the increasingly empty stands, the complete disengagement of the program by our student body, the talent we have relevant to other A-10 programs, the 8 years of no NCAA, and back to back losing seasons and make what should be an easy and obvious call after all of that, our athletic department has some huge foundational issues that run way deeper than the failings of our head men's basketball coach.
I think it would probably be a combination of a losing season and looking really bad in several games. So far, we are 1-4 in the A-10 and have looked really bad in most of them. We should be playing better.
Not since the year we went 4&22 and earlier under "Losin Lew" were we this horrible!Add to all of the above the clear dissatisfaction being expressed here and other places by alums, fans, and even more casual observers of the program, and the numbers (stats, record, etc.) that point to a program that is on life support and in the worst shape it's been in 40 years. Hardt has to do something. Perhaps another really embarrasing home loss, or CM losing his cool (very unlikely given his current pay and apparent acceptance of the status quo) will force Hardt's hand.
#NoMoreMooneyTruthing
So im still speculating we are going to end up around 13-18 or so. My theory the last several years was three things could get CM fired: 1) some kind of academic/recruiting violation, 2) a personal problem injurious to URs brand, or 3) back to back losing seasons.
Several folks seem to think back to back losing seasons isn’t enough so it got me thinking. Is there a number of wins/losses that changes the calculus on this? For example, I think it would be virtually impossible to go winless the remainder of the season and retain him. 7-24 or whatever that is?
So taking out the reality of our upcoming matchups, is there a record that Hardt can’t ignore?
I hear ya. I think if we see this narrative spread beyond Mooney and perhaps Bob Black, we have an issue. Right now, this seems to be Mooney's mantra. Is it Hardt's though?97, certainly haven't forgotten. That's why the "just wait 'til we have Nick and Blake" narrative is so important now.
Definitely a catch-22 situation. I want the Spiders to do much better than the projection, but that also puts us in the "close to .500" scenario. I think CM has one more year with another .500 record in conference. If they finish below 0.500, then there is a chance that a change is made for next season.Monte Carlo is projecting 11-20 (5-13) as the most frequent outcome. That is much worse than last year's 11-19 (9-9) considering the relative schedule strength. I certainly hope we do much better.
Anything close to .500 opens the door to the "candy and nuts" excuse-making, starting with "If we had Nick..." I really do believe that having Nick would add a couple of wins (over the entire season). I also believe the PTB have bought into the "we will be so much better next year" narrative.
Their practice sessions were really good. The projections for next year's WF Team are some of the best in years.How did Wake win 8 games?