DATE | OPP | RESULT | MIN | FG% | FT% | 3P% | REB | AST | BLK | STL | PF | TO | PTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fri 2/12 | vsSBU | W 67-64 | 37 | 31.3 | 90.0 | 25.0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 22 |
Tue 2/9 | @DAY | W 76-67 | 40 | 54.5 | 80.0 | 60.0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 19 |
Wed 2/3 | @URI | W 63-62 | 38 | 47.1 | 100.0 | 55.6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 23 |
Sat 1/30 | vsLAS | W 73-62 | 35 | 50.0 | 91.7 | 50.0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 24 |
Sat 1/23 | vsDAY | W 66-43 | 29 | 52.9 | 100.0 | 45.5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 28 |
He's a one-trick pony. Had a nice game against us the first time last year and we shut him up the second time. He shoots threes. That's it. He's a nice A10 player, but it's a joke that he's being considered as an NBA first round draft pick by anyone. He's not even one of the 10 best lambs of the past 15 years.
Heh, couldn't resist responding. Carry on...Oh, good…reinforcements have arrived.
So this isn’t his average game?Heh, couldn't resist responding. Carry on...
STARTERS | MIN | FG | 3PT | FT | OREB | DREB | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | PF | PTS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. HylandG | 30 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
Thanks for providing evidence that he primarily scores a lot against average or worse teams. He's a volume shooter. That's great at this level, but he won't ever have the chance to be that in the NBA, and it won't get him drafted in the first round as a sophomore.
The NCAA bubble is going to be incredibly soft this year. Which means so many teams will hang around, maybe including UR. If there actually is a tournament, I suspect the power 5 will gobble up nearly all the bubble bids because the NCAA needs eyes and we know a team like Duke or Kentucky draws more eyes. Just seems that if there’s a tournament, that UR is going to have to be well inside the line to make it.
Know DT doesn't necessary mean Duke and UK (add Mich St for me) making it but see enough other P5/6 schools getting the bids for whatever reasons the committee wants to use. Haven't followed things as intensely this season but tell me if wrong looking at these numbers. So 31 conference tourney champs get in which leaves 37 at-large bids left. I guess NET is a priority for selection but LOL at Colgate going up (not down) to #11.
So UR sits at #54. Looking at NET and Kenny and the sort, other mids ahead of UR getting a bid. For discussion sake out of the 37 at-large bids left AAC gets 1. WC BYU gets 1. Drake with injury could go into freefall so say 0 for MVC. The MW varies, but say 2. And right now either VCU or Bonny get 1 from the A10. So I count 5 leaving 32 at-large bids left. And not taking into account any surprises conference tourney winners in those mid conferences. Plus maybe conservative with the 5 number above?
Now going to the P5/6 conferences ....
1) Big Ten with NET 10 teams inside 50 and 11 with Indiana at #51. LOL but Penn St at #31. Kenny has 11 inside top 50.
2) Big 12 has 7 teams inside both NET and Kenny top 50.
3) SEC has 6 top 50 NET teams but Miss looks like a team on a roll to make it 7.
4) ACC only 5 inside top NET 50 but Cuse, NC close behind and Duke #66 . Kenny has 7 with Duke at #36 LOL.
5) Big East has only 4 inside both NET and Kenny top 50.
6) Pac12 has 5 teams in both NET and Kenny but could easily drop to 4.
Possible outcome for getting at-large bids .....
8 Big Ten
6 Big 12
4 SEC
4 ACC
3 Big East
4 Pac 12
Adds up to 29 P5/6 schools getting in leaving 3 bids for mids available. And disregard a losing conference record knocks out a bid for P5/6 school. We all know the committee has given those teams bids in the past. Probably conservative with the above 29 number too?
And finally my biggest concern for the A10 not getting more than 1 bid. I take mighty Ohio St football as an example. No doubt most fans thought of them as a top 4 team this season. Though since they played a small sample size schedule the doubters were still keen on making their voices heard that they weren't legit.
Now put the above scenario into CBB and the A10. Compared to the P5/6 whatever the reasons may be the A10 has not handled COVID well. The total league games played comparison for the A10 compared the big boys is poor.
So when the committee is discussing the A10 getting at-large bids does the small sample get brought up? And if asked by Jim Nantz Sunday night on why whoever from the A10 or maybe another mid league didn't get in, is that the answer? That's why i see a lot of validity in DT's post.
PS Look at the plenty of bubble P5/6 schools that could sneak in late like Stanford, MInny, Indiana, G Tech, Cuse, Miss, St John 's, and the percentage of played league games. Way more presently compared to both UR and St Louis. Mooney's team needs to win out is an understatement. No doubt if UR gets an at-large they earned it!
So now Hyland is Steph Curry? Really? Please, keep talking. I'm enjoying the absurdity of this, and I have nowhere to go.I guess Steph Curry was never a volume shooter.
But thanks for providing evidence that Bones is going to torch your weak defense.
Keep laughing.So now Hyland is Steph Curry? Really? Please, keep talking. I'm enjoying the absurdity of this, and I have nowhere to go.
45 all in OVERTIME. Ugly game.Loyola up 33-30 on drake. Might knock drake to the wrong side of the bubble if they can pull off their second win in a row.
3-2-1 you’re banned for blasphemy.Forget Hyland, hate to say but that's a pretty impressive list of wins [said Rick while throwing up in his mouth]
We have "best class ever".....THEY are in first place. Some of you need to eat humble pie.
For discussion sake out of the 37 at-large bids left AAC gets 1. WC BYU gets 1. Drake with injury could go into freefall so say 0 for MVC. The MW varies, but say 2. And right now either VCU or Bonny get 1 from the A10. So I count 5 leaving 32 at-large bids left.
He shouldn't be drafted as a Sophomore and don't expect to see that line ever again. Give him one more year and he's a first 5 pick. Apparently the Bonnies are average or worse I guess. Kind of like Kentucky-NOT!Thanks for providing evidence that he primarily scores a lot against average or worse teams. He's a volume shooter. That's great at this level, but he won't ever have the chance to be that in the NBA, and it won't get him drafted in the first round as a sophomore.
He does need to do his Jr. year as I stated. He's showing as 2nd round this year.I have been a fan of bones, but a top 5 pick? Cmon.
He does need to do his Jr. year as I stated. He's showing as 2nd round this year.
Also worth noting: he gets 3 offensive rebounds...so far this season. So once every 7 games, he gets one. Actually, why didn’t we recruit this guy?
Now if he gets 40 points on 15 shots along with 15 assists I'm going to blame you...Not slandering him at all. He seems like a nice kid and is a good A10 player. I'm simply illustrating through facts the absurdity of some of the claims made about him.
He certainly could go off for 40 points on Wednesday night against us, and tbh I hope he does. That means he's taking 25+ shots at the expense of involving the rest of their team, and we'll likely win. I'm more concerned if he has 15 points or so because that means their other players are probably scoring more.
Anyone keeping tabs on when the last EL kiss of death was?Now if he gets 40 points on 15 shots along with 15 assists I'm going to blame you...
He def knows we are his rival after his pissed off the ODU fans for not knowing they were a rival prior to their game this year.Easy guys, we have to play him Wednesday, and he may be reading the board: DonT mAKe bOOneS AnGRy!!!!!