I think we have had more “bad weather fans” than fair weather fans in the past, haha. People who only show up when the team is struggling and then disappear when the team starts doing well. Luckily they have not been around much this year!
I don't think we can count on Quinn to pick up the slack when King has an off game. King is responsible for so much on our offensive end, that Quinn would need to score about 25 and get 5+ assists to make up for an off night by King and honestly - Quinn does not have that ceiling.Yes, King had an off night, a bad game, which is gonna happen, especially as teams key on him. But we have to be able to overcome that. Our second most critical player to everything we do is Quinn and he also had a bad game. When both of them have that at the same time, you get what we got last night, which was largely an ass whooping, a game where we were never really in.
According to one poster they spelled Michael Time wrong…
No he doesn't. But when they both have bad games, we are probably going to lose and in a not so pretty fashion, like last night. If Quinn isn't off last night, I think we make a run and get the game close. Maybe we don't win, but we also are in the game, which we really weren't at all last night. Point is, Quinn has to step up way more than he did last night.I don't think we can count on Quinn to pick up the slack when King has an off game. King is responsible for so much on our offensive end, that Quinn would need to score about 25 and get 5+ assists to make up for an off night by King and honestly - Quinn does not have that ceiling.
Just needs to be able to control himself better, like a car hydroplaning on a wet road. His steps are soTyne is fun to watch, has speed, goes all in, no nonsense, drives to the hoop, and can score.
This is his 5th season and he has played in 131 games, I think he just is what he is at this point.No he doesn't. But when they both have bad games, we are probably going to lose and in a not so pretty fashion, like last night. If Quinn isn't off last night, I think we make a run and get the game close. Maybe we don't win, but we also are in the game, which we really weren't at all last night. Point is, Quinn has to step up way more than he did last night.
Well with my name, you can call me Rich, or you can call me Rick, family members who have passed called me Richie, one guy calls me Ricardo, My name is Richard.
But you don’t have to call me Dick, even if I know a few people who would like to…
Neal's had big games for us. I think it's hard to play a big man's game will with a hip issue.
Exactly - Quinn is who he is. We know what to expect. You hope to get 10 points and probably 5 rebounds and maybe 3-5 assists (mainly because he plays so much on the perimeter).This is his 5th season and he has played in 131 games, I think he just is what he is at this point.
Agree with all of this. But in true freshman fashion, he also had several REALLY ill-advised shots. D-Lo too.Tyne is fun to watch, has speed, goes all in, no nonsense, drives to the hoop, and can score.
Seems to have a pretty good game all around especially for a freshman. Definitely agree on ill-advised shots. Can hit the outside shots, but needs work on that. If he can get cntl over and make higher pct outside shots, he's gonna be a heck of a player.Agree with all of this. But in true freshman fashion, he also had several REALLY ill-advised shots. D-Lo too.
With 2 open spots, despite how amazing King is, I wonder if replacing Quinn is top priority. Not sure Walz or Soulis will be better than Quinn day 1 next season.Yep, Tyne is a very interesting case. We know little guys usually can adjust to the speed of the game a lot quicker than big guys. But he is super at being able to stay in front of his man on defense, and get to the basket, and create opportunities. My hope is that his shot making will benefit from all the seasoning and experience this year. He is already pretty fearless out there, maybe a tad too much at some times. Still thinking we will look for another scorer in the portal for the back court. Hoping Tanner is ready next year, but not much opportunity this year so feel like will be more learning curve with him for next season.
The Roche situation was expected, or at least it is what I expected when we recruited him. His usage rate at Citadel and at Richmond are essentially identical at ~18%, which is very low for someone whose main role is shooting. He is playing the same way he was at Citadel, he has not regressed or anything he just isn't playing 35 minutes per game because we have other good players. He needs to find a way to get more shots up when he is on the court.Not sure who gets the blame for the Roche situation, but it's really odd. A bunch of solid programs wanted him last year and it was a major get for us to land him. I refuse to believe that he could go from being the best freshman three-point shooter in the nation to a bit player. That's not how it works.
Do other athletes think about the $ bball and football get? I dont know of any who do.Basically ZERO school spirit. I’m sure there are some sour grapes about the attention (and dollars) that the basketball team gets compared to all the other sports, but athletes are supposed to be representing their school. If you have to be there you might as well make the most of it. Another sign of how little sports matter to the student body. Too much “what’s in it for me” with this generation.
He is going to be a star here at UR but seeing the results of the game, Im not so sure him being the controlling ingredient in the offense is the best thing.
It was every other team we have, except for women's basketball, which was playing at vcu at the time.Do other athletes think about the $ bball and football get? I dont know of any who do.
Sounds very disappointing that these athletes didnt show support. Do we know which sports they played?
I blame myself. I really thought this would be a big year for Roche. I thought he would be starting, playing near 28 minutes a night and being a consistent shooter. I thought with King and Hunt handling the ball - he would be a the key guy to float around the 3 point line and get kicks out on drives, and also kick outs with Quinn in the post. I was hoping he would be getting near 10 points a night - probably making 2 threes a game, throw in a back door and then get to the free throw line - I saw him being a key player this year and it just never happened.Not sure who gets the blame for the Roche situation, but it's really odd. A bunch of solid programs wanted him last year and it was a major get for us to land him. I refuse to believe that he could go from being the best freshman three-point shooter in the nation to a bit player. That's not how it works.
Strange. My son and his teammates went to every BBall game even when the team wasnt very good. That must have been a lot of seats to fill and maybe why the crowd was so dead. Should reconsider that event if students arent going to support the team.It was every other team we have, except for women's basketball, which was playing at vcu at the time.
Surprisingly, they are not getting killed on fastbreaks despite trying for offensive rebounds! 🤯 (Oh right, when you try for them and get them, you don't need to defend the fastbreaks!)defense, pound inside, and rebounding, the umass formula
Martin sends the offside to the boards and retreats the shooting side to defense. Good plan that's coached.Surprisingly, they are not getting killed on fastbreaks despite trying for offensive rebounds! 🤯 (Oh right, when you try for them and get them, you don't need to defend the fastbreaks!)
UMass spanked VCU by 22 points, 74-52.Are they going to spank both us and VCU sandwiched around a loss to La Salle?