THIS COULD BE TROUBLE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE ALARMISTS

[WebSpinner]

recent article in the UK Express with scientist claiming that inactivity on the sun could bring a mini ice-age maybe this year and lasting until 2050. not trusting this since in 1981 or so driving with my frat bro and our wives to KIAWAH for some fun and sun. he is a doc and had several of his scientific journals so in perusing them found an article by a scientist who was predicting a cooling period such that we would not be able to grow crops north of jacksonville, fl. that did not come to pass or even close. however, if this happens, there actually will be a big climate change and more importantly, nothing to do with man. in fact, if the so-called alarmists think they are right about man being the culprit, they should call for all of us to produce more CO2 to attempt to keep the temp up from this pesky sun business. we shall see and personally, have always stated would much rather live in a period of global warming than global cooling even though don't think we have much to do with any of these natural occurances. sorry, attempted to paste the article below but was too long. will try and find a more concise copy.

 

[iSpider]

recent article in the UK Express with scientist claiming that inactivity on the sun could bring a mini ice-age maybe this year and lasting until 2050. not trusting this since in 1981 or so driving with my frat bro and our wives to KIAWAH for some fun and sun. he is a doc and had several of his scientific journals so in perusing them found an article by a scientist who was predicting a cooling period such that we would not be able to grow crops north of jacksonville, fl. that did not come to pass or even close. however, if this happens, there actually will be a big climate change and more importantly, nothing to do with man. in fact, if the so-called alarmists think they are right about man being the culprit, they should call for all of us to produce more CO2 to attempt to keep the temp up from this pesky sun business. we shall see and personally, have always stated would much rather live in a period of global warming than global cooling even though don't think we have much to do with any of these natural occurances. sorry, attempted to paste the article below but was too long. will try and find a more concise copy.

So you and your “doc” buddy think that 3, 879 scientists (all docs) from 87 countries are just messing with us?
Luckily, I would guess, based on your age, you won’t be around to suffer the ill effects of global warming. It will your children and their offspring who will be the beneficiaries of those like you and your buddy, the “doc.”

 

[WebSpinner]

have always thought, when prince charles, the current pope, the united nations, hollywood, the mainstream media, the democrat party, european socialists, all agree on something, red flags are flying all over the place. you have to understand, most people understand that we have had some warming, the prob is that your people are attempting to blame it on man. doing my own thinking and reading and viewing other scientists, have come to other conclusions other than man. the alarmists act like CO2 is some monster, some poison, while in reality, without CO2, there would be no life on the planet, it is a necessity. nature creates enormous amounts of CO2, man a very small amount. also, there are several factors involved in warming and cooling not just CO2. all of the alarmists, sky is falling, folks listed above just keep regurgitating the same numbers, the same %s, the same story without having done any independent thinking or research. for example the UN utilizes about 26 computer models for all of their thoughts on the issue and according to one doc, not thousands but one, all but one of them have been wrong, are wrong and one gets it closer to what is actually happening. you cannot, and this is what they have done, view a few years of warming, then project this out 75 years and say we are all going to die. agree, we are all going to die but not because of warming. if this scientist, quoted on the inactivity of the sun, is right, hope she is not, the global warming cult has a lot of splaining to do to their clones and followers. how could the climate change without man causing it? well, the climate has been changing long before man came along and is a natural situation. do you know what the optimum temperature on earth is or should be? go find the answer and come back to class grasshopper.

 

[urfan1]

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-the-global-cooling-story-came-to-be/

 

[iSpider]

have always thought, when prince charles, the current pope, the united nations, hollywood, the mainstream media, the democrat party, european socialists, all agree on something, red flags are flying all over the place.

That is a certainly fine scientific way to come to conclusions. I'm sure it has served you well among the other deploreables you deem friends.

In a way, it's good that you are dotard. At least the world will not have another lifetime to listen to your homespun ignorance.
Calling the Russian interference a hoax is to fly in the face of all of our intelligence agencies and accept the word of a notorious liar who has no experience or background in intelligence, both national and personal.

But I can see why you identify with him. He is also stupid like you. Stupid as a stone that the other stones make fun of. So stupid that you have traveled far beyond stupid as we know it and into a new dimension of stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid cubed. Trans-stupid stupid. Stupid collapsed to a singularity where even the stupons have collapsed into stuponium. Stupid so dense that no intelligence can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot summer day on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one minute than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. It cannot be possible that anything in our universe can really be this stupid. This is a primordial fragment from the original big stupid bang. A pure extract of stupid with absolute stupid purity. Stupid beyond the laws of nature.

 

[iSpider]

have always thought, when prince charles, the current pope, the united nations, hollywood, the mainstream media, the democrat party, european socialists, all agree on something, red flags are flying all over the place. you have to understand, most people understand that we have had some warming, the prob is that your people are attempting to blame it on man. doing my own thinking and reading and viewing other scientists, have come to other conclusions other than man. the alarmists act like CO2 is some monster, some poison, while in reality, without CO2, there would be no life on the planet, it is a necessity. nature creates enormous amounts of CO2, man a very small amount. also, there are several factors involved in warming and cooling not just CO2. all of the alarmists, sky is falling, folks listed above just keep regurgitating the same numbers, the same %s, the same story without having done any independent thinking or research. view a few years of warming, then project this out 75 years and say we are all going to die. agree, we are all going to die but not because of warming. if this scientist, quoted on the inactivity of the sun, is right, hope she is not, the global warming cult has a lot of splaining to do to their clones and followers. how could the climate change without man causing it? well, the climate has been changing long before man came along and is a natural situation. do you know what the optimum temperature on earth is or should be? go find the answer and come back to class grasshopper.

Hmmmm....you and your bud, the doc, with Trumpfian conspiracy theory vs. the belief of the all of the scientific organizations listed below. The link at the bottom of page is provided for more information.

I get your stupidity. No problem, my apologies to your bud, the doc, for outing his ignorance. Let him know that Grasshopper thinks he should go with the scientists.

List of Worldwide Scientific Organizations
The following are scientific organizations that hold the position that Climate Change is harmful and has been caused by human action:
Academia Chilena de Ciencias, Chile
Academia das Ciencias de Lisboa, Portugal
Academia de Ciencias de la República Dominicana
Academia de Ciencias Físicas, Matemáticas y Naturales de Venezuela
Academia de Ciencias Medicas, Fisicas y Naturales de Guatemala
Academia Mexicana de Ciencias,Mexico
Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Bolivia
Academia Nacional de Ciencias del Peru
Académie des Sciences, France
Academies of Arts, Humanities and Sciences of Canada
Academy of Athens
Academy of Science of Mozambique
Academy of Science of South Africa
Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS)
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academy of Sciences of Moldova
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
Academy of Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt
Academy of the Royal Society of New Zealand
Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Italy
Africa Centre for Climate and Earth Systems Science
African Academy of Sciences
Amazon Environmental Research Institute
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Anthropological Association
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association of State Climatologists (AASC)
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
American Astronomical Society
American Chemical Society
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Fisheries Society
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Institute of Physics
American Meteorological Society
American Physical Society
American Public Health Association
American Quaternary Association
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Agronomy
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Society of Plant Biologists
American Statistical Association
Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
Australian Academy of Science
Australian Bureau of Meteorology
Australian Coral Reef Society
Australian Institute of Marine Science
Australian Institute of Physics
Australian Marine Sciences Association
Australian Medical Association
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
Botanical Society of America
Brazilian Academy of Sciences
British Antarctic Survey
California Academy of Sciences
Cameroon Academy of Sciences
Canadian Association of Physicists
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
Canadian Geophysical Union
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Canadian Society of Soil Science
Canadian Society of Zoologists
Center for International Forestry Research
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Colombian Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) (Australia)
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
Croatian Academy of Arts and Sciences
Crop Science Society of America
Cuban Academy of Sciences
Delegation of the Finnish Academies of Science and Letters
Ecological Society of America
Ecological Society of Australia
Environmental Protection Agency
European Academy of Sciences and Arts
European Federation of Geologists
European Geosciences Union
European Physical Society
European Science Foundation
Federation of American Scientists
French Academy of Sciences
Geological Society of America
Geological Society of Australia
Geological Society of London
Georgian Academy of Sciences
German Academy of Natural Scientists Leopoldina
Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
Indian National Science Academy
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management
Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology
Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, UK
InterAcademy Council
International Alliance of Research Universities
International Arctic Science Committee
International Association for Great Lakes Research
International Council for Science
International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences
International Research Institute for Climate and Society
International Union for Quaternary Research
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
International Union of Pure and Applied Physics
Islamic World Academy of Sciences
Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
Kenya National Academy of Sciences
Korean Academy of Science and Technology
Kosovo Academy of Sciences and Arts
l'Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
Latin American Academy of Sciences
Latvian Academy of Sciences
Lithuanian Academy of Sciences
Madagascar National Academy of Arts, Letters, and Sciences
Mauritius Academy of Science and Technology
Montenegrin Academy of Sciences and Arts
National Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, Argentina
National Academy of Sciences of Armenia
National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic
National Academy of Sciences, Sri Lanka
National Academy of Sciences, United States of America
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Association of Geoscience Teachers
National Association of State Foresters
National Center for Atmospheric Research
National Council of Engineers Australia
National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, New Zealand
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Research Council
National Science Foundation
Natural England
Natural Environment Research Council, UK
Natural Science Collections Alliance
Network of African Science Academies
New York Academy of Sciences
Nicaraguan Academy of Sciences
Nigerian Academy of Sciences
Norwegian Academy of Sciences and Letters
Oklahoma Climatological Survey
Organization of Biological Field Stations
Pakistan Academy of Sciences
Palestine Academy for Science and Technology
Pew Center on Global Climate Change
Polish Academy of Sciences
Romanian Academy
Royal Academies for Science and the Arts of Belgium
Royal Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences of Spain
Royal Astronomical Society, UK
Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters
Royal Irish Academy
Royal Meteorological Society (UK)
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Royal Scientific Society of Jordan
Royal Society of Canada
Royal Society of Chemistry, UK
Royal Society of the United Kingdom
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Russian Academy of Sciences
Science and Technology, Australia
Science Council of Japan
Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research
Scientific Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Slovak Academy of Sciences
Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Society for Ecological Restoration International
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Society of American Foresters
Society of Biology (UK)
Society of Systematic Biologists
Soil Science Society of America
Sudan Academy of Sciences
Sudanese National Academy of Science
Tanzania Academy of Sciences
The Wildlife Society (international)
Turkish Academy of Sciences
Uganda National Academy of Sciences
Union of German Academies of Sciences and Humanities
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Woods Hole Research Center
World Association of Zoos and Aquariums
World Federation of Public Health Associations
World Forestry Congress
World Health Organization
World Meteorological Organization
Zambia Academy of Sciences
Zimbabwe Academy of Sciences

Yep, your bud, the doc, definitely should go with the scientists.
You? Well, you're just a lost cause.

http://www.opr.ca.gov/facts/list-of-scientific-organizations.html

 

[32counter]

Somebody with a very big money dick is getting in the climate control business.They see a BIG business.

No more bible bullshit.Real money science at work.Their buddies with Bloomberg and laugh at Agent Orange.


World's Largest Asset Manager Puts Climate At The Center Of Its Investment Strategy

https://www.npr.org/2020/01/14/7962...limate-at-the-center-of-its-investment-strate

Bezos putting up $10,000,000,000 in Fund to fight climate change

https://money.yahoo.com/jeff-bezos-...e-200822069.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=ma

Agent Orange can’t compete with these real money guys.

 

[WebSpinner]

well now, someone is getting close to what is going on with this. as they, whoever they are, say, follow the money and of course, "the narrative". viewing several scientists in interviews, they state that grants, research $$$ is driving most of this and anyone who has another view, gets booted or forced to resign. am no scientist but view and read all i can get my hands on, and just too much out there to think the sky is falling. just in the past 30 years or so, many on your side have given us 10 years or else and none of it has ever happened. kind of like the boy who cried wolf. have always thought that the earth was either cooling or warming and that is probably right. to hook on to CO2 as the only culprit, when there are numerous things which influence climate, is just not good science. since CO2 is the only one of those influences which man has anything to do with it, seems pretty simple what the narrative is about. in fact, seems most scientists are not giving a "sky is falling" projection, only politicians and activists. did anyone find out what our temperature on earth should be? none of this even matters if the lady scientist is right about the lack of sun activity changing our climate. hope i am gone, hate cold weather, love warm weather.

 

[invinoveritasinaquasanitas]

well now, someone is getting close to what is going on with this. as they, whoever they are, say, follow the money and of course, "the narrative". viewing several scientists in interviews, they state that grants, research $$$ is driving most of this and anyone who has another view, gets booted or forced to resign. am no scientist but view and read all i can get my hands on, and just too much out there to think the sky is falling. just in the past 30 years or so, many on your side have given us 10 years or else and none of it has ever happened. kind of like the boy who cried wolf. have always thought that the earth was either cooling or warming and that is probably right. to hook on to CO2 as the only culprit, when there are numerous things which influence climate, is just not good science. since CO2 is the only one of those influences which man has anything to do with it, seems pretty simple what the narrative is about. in fact, seems most scientists are not giving a "sky is falling" projection, only politicians and activists. did anyone find out what our temperature on earth should be? none of this even matters if the lady scientist is right about the lack of sun activity changing our climate. hope i am gone, hate cold weather, love warm weather.

Gone or not, perhaps these articles will help us understand.
It's misleading to ask what Earth's 'ideal temperature' is. Here's what's really important

BELCHING BOVINES - Methane isn’t just cow farts; it’s also cow burps (and other weird facts you didn’t know about this potent greenhouse gas)

 

[WebSpinner]

little i, you came on here long ago and quoted the narrative that 97% of scientists believe in global warming. that was wrong and now you have moved the pea a bit. you must be a smart guy but just like the russian hoax, which i am sure you bought hook, like and sinker, you have been had. think you have to be included in the group i listed above who are just hangers on, grab a narrative and go with it whether it is right or wrong. we will see but glad i keep an open mind and just don't believe every item i see whether good or bad. typically there are two side to every issue and typically there is an agenda so we must do out own dive and not just believe what is being spewed by either side of said issue.

 

[invinoveritasinaquasanitas]

little i, you came on here long ago and quoted the narrative that 97% of scientists believe in global warming. that was wrong and now you have moved the pea a bit. you must be a smart guy but just like the russian hoax, which i am sure you bought hook, like and sinker, you have been had. think you have to be included in the group i listed above who are just hangers on, grab a narrative and go with it whether it is right or wrong. we will see but glad i keep an open mind and just don't believe every item i see whether good or bad. typically there are two side to every issue and typically there is an agenda so we must do out own dive and not just believe what is being spewed by either side of said issue.

Are you talking to me?

 

[iSpider]

Comrade Spinner doesn't have a clue who he is talking to. He doesn't care. He just lashes out against that part of the body politic that refuses to accept his White Nationalist paleoconservative reactionary agenda.
Truth is he is a political foundling, left at birth on the doorstep of Huey Long, the ”Kingfish,” who immediately rejected him. And rightly so. That's why he hates democrats and berates their character using words he doesn't understand. The Dems made him a waif in his crucial formative years. He's never forgiven them. He never will. And that's why I roam these forums--to keep him in check, ironically employing Trumpfian tactics, turning the tables on his invective by employing his idol’s modus operandi.

There are a few others on here who support Trumpf and occasionally make posts to that end. They are generally not as ignorant nor as benighted, though they all appear to be well south of dull normal. I have succeeded in chasing many of them back to the underworld where they cower and tremble in their shadow afraid to voice more of what they know is non-sense.

Spinner, however, has no pride and wears his ignorance as a badge of courage.

So let me leave you with something to think about-- ”typically there is an agenda so we must do out own dive.”

God save our Republic!

 

[iSpider]

little i, you came on here long ago and quoted the narrative that 97% of scientists believe in global warming. that was wrong and now you have moved the pea a bit.

Alas, right again. It was 98%. Sorry. Now it's up to 98.6%.

 

[WebSpinner]

little i, you call what i say, lashing out? come on, am never personal and just state how i feel. in about 1990, heard a guy, probably radio, could be tv but he said that if anyone wanted to know where all the 60s radicals, sds, weatherman underground, the socialists, communists, anti-capitalists went, look to the environmental movement. this is where they can cause the most damage to capitalism under the guise of saving the planet. aoc's manager says that the new green deal is not about the environment or the planet but about changing the economic system. ever hear of ottmar denhofer? lead author of the IPCC's 4th summary report in 2007. in 2010 big O advised in a speech he was giving, "one has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is enviromental policy. instead, climate change policy is about how we redistribute the world's wealth." another un climate chief stated, the true aim on the un's 2014 paris climate accord was to change capitalist economic model. ms stewart, canada's former minister of the environment said, "no matter if the science is phony, there are collateral environmental benefits...climate change provides the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world. tim wirth, former us undersecretary of state for global affairs said, "we've got to ride the global warming issue. even if the theory is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy". look at the people and enities i listed above and all are in the ship of wanting to change the US from capitalist to socialist and for us to pony up our wealth for the rest of the world. guess they don't think it is fair for us to be a wealthy nation while some others struggle. by the way, have you visited what the paris accord actually is? when i did, found it was nothing like i thought it would be, actually a worthless document(s) other than it was in the US's pocket again. it does absolutely nothing for the environment. research it, amazing what these fine folks have snookered the world, or at least the normal people of the world who will not read it and figure out it is all fluff and no substance BUT, it did make all those in attendance feel good about themselves. trump would have been a criminal not to get us out of that. you can throw the environmentalists, the globalists, global warming and climate change folks, they are all one and the same, into the same basket and they have admitted what their goals are and it is socialism, redistribution of wealth, gosh, the democrat party mantra for years.

 

[invinoveritasinaquasanitas]

little i, you call what i say, lashing out? come on, am never personal and just state how i feel. in about 1990, heard a guy, probably radio, could be tv but he said that if anyone wanted to know where all the 60s radicals, sds, weatherman underground, the socialists, communists, anti-capitalists went, look to the environmental movement. this is where they can cause the most damage to capitalism under the guise of saving the planet. aoc's manager says that the new green deal is not about the environment or the planet but about changing the economic system. ever hear of ottmar denhofer? lead author of the IPCC's 4th summary report in 2007. in 2010 big O advised in a speech he was giving, "one has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is enviromental policy. instead, climate change policy is about how we redistribute the world's wealth." another un climate chief stated, the true aim on the un's 2014 paris climate accord was to change capitalist economic model. ms stewart, canada's former minister of the environment said, "no matter if the science is phony, there are collateral environmental benefits...climate change provides the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world. tim wirth, former us undersecretary of state for global affairs said, "we've got to ride the global warming issue. even if the theory is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy". look at the people and enities i listed above and all are in the ship of wanting to change the US from capitalist to socialist and for us to pony up our wealth for the rest of the world. guess they don't think it is fair for us to be a wealthy nation while some others struggle. by the way, have you visited what the paris accord actually is? when i did, found it was nothing like i thought it would be, actually a worthless document other than it was in the US's pocket again. it does absolutely nothing for the environment. research it, amazing what these fine folks have snookered the world, or at least the normal people of the world who will not read it and figure out it is all fluff and no substance BUT, it did make all those in attendance feel good about themselves. trump would have been a criminal not to get us out of that. you can throw the environmentalists, the globalists, global warming and climate change folks, they are all one and the same, into the same basket and they have admitted what their goals are and it is socialism, redistribution of wealth, gosh, the democrat party mantra for years.

I'd really prefer to keep this discussion more civil and germane to the topic. I do not mean to suggest that you do not have a right to argue what you believe, but it seems to me that Trump will hold nothing sacrosanct and will stoop to unfair and devious means to prove his point once someone questions his position, however meritless it may be. I just happened across the following article this morning and thought it might be worthy of consideration.

How a group allied with the Trump administration is paying a German teen to question established climate science.

“The tactic is intended to create an equivalency in spokespeople and message. In this case, it is a false equivalency between a message based in climate science that went viral organically and a message based in climate skepticism trying to catch up using paid promotion."

 

[WebSpinner]

well gosh, bloomberg is paying numerous bloggers big bucks to just post great stuff about him. who cares what any teen says about anything, they have not lived long enough to have experienced much at all, look at greta garbo or whatever her name is, a special needs teen completely brainwashed and used by climate change activists.

 

[invinoveritasinaquasanitas]

well gosh, bloomberg is paying numerous bloggers big bucks to just post great stuff about him. who cares what any teen says about anything, they have not lived long enough to have experienced much at all, look at greta garbo or whatever her name is, a special needs teen completely brainwashed and used by climate change activists.

So you're saying that the voices of our youth do not matter?
You know, other than those Republicans who are Trump sycophants and Toadies, most of us support doing something about the imminent dangers of global warming.

 

[WebSpinner]

think a lot of youths, was one, but there is a reason for having age limitations on voting, being president, etc. during his run for president, ole beato down here in TX was apologizing for the things he did in his youth while pelosi was asking to have 16 year olds vote, what a contrast in reality. saw your buddy bloomberg almost stick his foot in his mouth when speaking of the 21 democrat seats in the house he supported. he was saying he boug.... then caught himself although he did buy the seats just like he is attempting to buy the right to run for president. saw an interview recently with a woman who was the former commonwealth's attorney in a northern va county. she was asked what she spent in her past elections which she won and she indicated about $10,000. asked what the opponent who just defeated her spent and she said $1.5 million. this is called buying offices, elections and is going on all over the country. heck beato had millions more than cruz, mostly from ny and ca but still lost, mainly because he just does not have it and apologizes for his entire life and what color he is and what he did when he was 16 and then later in college. as aside, interview here in houston with a young lady exiting the voting area and being asked who she voted for for senator and she stated that she was sick of white people, she was white, so she voted for robert francis o'rouarke, DUH, when cruz is hispanic. that is how smart some voters are, sad but true. as far as i can tell, there is no imminent danger from global warming and those giving us 10 years, once again, for about the 4th time, should be brought up on charges for scaring people to death over what is really a redistribution of wealth and social justice, campaign. every issue democrats and socialist work on is a "sky is falling" deal and it is silly and non-productive for them. if the 10 year warning had not happened over and over again for decades, you might have a case but the scare tactics have never come true. just like the russia hoax, at some point you have to do your own work, not just accept activists' work or just be slapped in the face once again and i guess say "thank you sir, may i have another".

 

[iSpider]

think a lot of youths, was one, but there is a reason for having age limitations on voting, being president, etc. during his run for president, ole beato down here in TX was apologizing for the things he did in his youth while pelosi was asking to have 16 year olds vote, what a contrast in reality. saw your buddy bloomberg almost stick his foot in his mouth when speaking of the 21 democrat seats in the house he supported. he was saying he boug.... then caught himself although he did buy the seats just like he is attempting to buy the right to run for president. saw an interview recently with a woman who was the former commonwealth's attorney in a northern va county. she was asked what she spent in her past elections which she won and she indicated about $10,000. asked what the opponent who just defeated her spent and she said $1.5 million. this is called buying offices, elections and is going on all over the country. heck beato had millions more than cruz, mostly from ny and ca but still lost, mainly because he just does not have it and apologizes for his entire life and what color he is and what he did when he was 16 and then later in college. as aside, interview here in houston with a young lady exiting the voting area and being asked who she voted for for senator and she stated that she was sick of white people, she was white, so she voted for robert francis o'rouarke, DUH, when cruz is hispanic. that is how smart some voters are, sad but true. as far as i can tell, there is no imminent danger from global warming and those giving us 10 years, once again, for about the 4th time, should be brought up on charges for scaring people to death over what is really a redistribution of wealth and social justice, campaign. every issue democrats and socialist work on is a "sky is falling" deal and it is silly and non-productive for them. if the 10 year warning had not happened over and over again for decades, you might have a case but the scare tactics have never come true. just like the russia hoax, at some point you have to do your own work, not just accept activists' work or just be slapped in the face once again and i guess say "thank you sir, may i have another".

Yes, always turn the other check and say thank you. That is especially true for birdbrains like you.
Moving on:

So what do you think of Citizens United now that the shoe is on the other foot, you aimless, babbling moron?

BTW, say hi for me to your bud, the doc.

 

[WebSpinner]

why do you get so personal when someone provides information you probably don't even know about in your media journey with only other group thinkers? why can't you just understand that people have different points of view and respect that? what is the group you mentioned? don't know it and you can inform me.

 

[SpiderRick]

Yes, always turn the other check and say thank you. That is especially true for birdbrains like you.
Moving on:

So what do you think of Citizens United now that the shoe is on the other foot, you aimless, babbling moron?

BTW, say hi for me to your bud, the doc.

Typical democrat, insults and name calling when they have nothing else. You are so disrespectful and can't tolerate any other opinions. You really do think you're better than everyone else, don't you? I can't believe the moderators leave your crap up.

TRUMP 2020 FINISH THE JOB

 

[iSpider]

Typical democrat, insults and name calling when they have nothing else. You are so disrespectful and can't tolerate any other opinions. You really do think you're better than everyone else, don't you? I can't believe the moderators leave your crap up.
TRUMP 2020 FINISH THE JOB

Democrat??? How dare you. So how do you spell Pot-Calling-The-Kettle-Black? Clue: Its initials are SpiderRick.

Why is it that Trumpf supporters get their panties all in a knot when someone criticizes them or their candidate using the same tactics as those used by Trumpf?

What, are you also a communist? A fascist? A Nazi? A Baptist?
Or just another malcontent who had hoped Hillary had been locked up?
Or, perhaps, just another moron who has fallen for the rhetoric of demagoguery, immorality, and hypocrisy?

You fail to realize that Comrade Webspinner started this....he did it first. (Shucks, sorry, using another Trumpf tactic. It's in my system. Thanks a lot, Comrade Webspinner). But, truth is, had you followed the dialog, you wouldn't have made such an absurd statement.
But I guess that would have required some effort.

Such is the nature of a true Trumpfophiliac, i.e., a Trumpfopotamus suffering from Trumpfophrenia.
Ahem. Tut-Tut.

Oh, Phooey.
Every time I respond to such a ridiculous post nothing but snark comes out.

So on to a more jovial view of your man.
Donnie and his mates:

 

[iSpider]

 

[iSpider]

 

[SpiderRick]

Put your bottle down and take your meds, i, I care about you....