Do you approve of the move to the Patriot League?
- By 97spiderfan
- UR Football Board
- 254 Replies
I agree that we are not set up in any fashion to be an FBS program. I didn't mean to imply that we are. What I did imply is that we went from a Top FCS football program in the country, playing in the strongest FCS league in the country to now moving to the Patriot League, probably one of the weakest FCS league in the country and comprised of teams that a decade ago we all thought and were very much beneath our program.I completed understand the sentiment that you all are sharing. I remember being at college gameday in 2016 when we beat JMU and it was an awesome experience. I am in complete agreement that I want us to have the mentality of athletics and academics working synergistically with one another as evident by numerous other schools who use athletics to leverage and boost their school profile.
I will say though that in fairness to our athletic department, we aren't a JMU when it comes to school profile. We do not have the resources, infrastructure, money to be an FBS school. Even if we did join FBS, for every JMU success stories there are plenty more of the UMass's of the world that the football is on a sinking ship and its dragging down all of its athletics department. In today's day-and-age of college football, the divide is becoming even more apparent between the haves and have-nots. Not only would we need money for a lot more scholarships, coaching salaries, facilities, but even the higher NIL to keep up with the Jones's is too much. All for what? To be in Conference USA and hope we finish 6-6 and make it to the Cheez-itz bowl? I don't know how many others feel this way, but I do not want to hurt all of our other sports for the sake of chasing an FBS pipe dream.
This leads me to the next point. Just because we aren't throwing everything we have at football, doesn't mean we aren't dedicated to the athletic success on this campus. I can't find the newsletter for it, but didn't we have 10 out of our 19 teams either finish 1st or 2nd this year in the A10 conference? We also had 5 championships this year (WBall regular season + tournament, MBall regular season, Football regular season, WLax tournament) which is the most since the mid 2000s. The reality is we don't have infinite amount of money/resources and we have to pick and choose our battles. I think many people would rather strive for national success in basketball first and foremost, and also have success with sports like lacrosse or baseball than put all our eggs in the football basket like UMass has.
I agree though that the timing of the move of Patriot League was not good, nor was the reason we gave to be near other teams geographically where our alumni reside. I do think CAA is unstable and will likely break apart at some point, and whether teams like W&M and Villanova come to the Patriot League, time will tell. Also, I wouldn't say it has hurt our recruiting so far. Look at the other offers of high school recruits who have committed here. They have been very solid and comparable to years past. We even have a verbal commitment from a recruit who had P5 offers from Tennessee at one point. The goal is to make deep runs in the NCAA tournament. The conference affiliation is a means to that end.
Past athletic department leaders (Jim Miller, Chuck Boone) would not have allowed the CAA to spiral the way it did, because they had respect and a large amount of input over the direction of the conference. Current leadership does not have the same gravitas and vis a vis the University of Richmond does not the same clout it once had.
We used to wield an outsized influence for a school of our size, locally, within our conferences, and statewide. We don't anymore and we are trending downward with each passing year.