We got him. HUGE addition to the team, still have one more spot left
I said the same thing last year... and saying it again. Unless CM is going to change his offense (which he thought about last year but didn't per newspaper article) we need a quality big man as Walz and Beagle are not the answer.Excellent pick up! Welcome to Spider Nation Jaden! Let’s go get a stud PG and we might be back in business.
I agree with prior comments shared here that while I agree with that notion, there are very few quality big men as transfers and likely won’t be able to land a top tier one. Plus we have Walz and Beagle so no one is going to come here to be the 3rd guy. We’ll need to get 1-2 big men after next season. I think Walz/Beagle will be okay enough at the 5 spot for us. Jaden fits the need at the 4. I think Johnson is a starter at the 3 for us. I like Tyne but not as main PG. Not sure if it’s too late, but we need to find our Jordan King this year.I said the same thing last year... and saying it again. Unless CM is going to change his offense (which he thought about last year but didn't per newspaper article) we need a quality big man as Walz and Beagle are not the answer.
I am excited. He put up 25 points in 20 minutes against Ohio State last year.I said the same thing last year... and saying it again. Unless CM is going to change his offense (which he thought about last year but didn't per newspaper article) we need a quality big man as Walz and Beagle are not the answer.
I agree with prior comments shared here that while I agree with that notion, there are very few quality big men as transfers and likely won’t be able to land a top tier one. Plus we have Walz and Beagle so no one is going to come here to be the 3rd guy. We’ll need to get 1-2 big men after next season. I think Walz/Beagle will be okay enough at the 5 spot for us. Jaden fits the need at the 4. I think Johnson is a starter at the 3 for us. I like Tyne but not as main PG. Not sure if it’s too late, but we need to find our Jordan King this year.
Of course the Ram faithful will say they backed off.Great pick-up. I know he was interested in VCU as well, so either the Spiders out recruited them for him, or the Rams backed off.
Or that he couldn't get in because of academics. 🤮Of course the Ram faithful will say they backed off.
Was thinking Johnston fills more of a 3 role similar to Roche when he first got here. He will probably play the 2 and Tyne the 1. When was the last time we had a taller guard be our primary ball handler? Always been 6’ or shorter as far as I can remember. It was more wishful thinking on my end that we’re still going after a top PG. We need an elite PG who is quick, create their own shot, good shooter, and good distributor of the ball. I don’t think neither Tyne nor Johnston check all those boxes.Johnston at 3? He’s a PG. I think he’s given the chance to run the show here. Maybe it’s a shared backcourt with the combo 2 PG thing or we need Johnston more at shooting guard if Tyne is starter. Expecting a Johnston Tyne backcourt. Still small but at least Johnston has more size.
Daughtry yeah I hope he plays 4. Maybe he gets some time here at 5 but I’d rather play him with a 5. We could rebound. Would take philosophy change by Moon. He sees himself as stretch 4 but actually played C at Indiana State. How Moon views it will be interesting. Very efficient player maybe stamina prevented more mins.
I think AP will be better coming off the bench for either the 3 or 4 and not as starting. If we don’t get a top PG then my next hope is a lengthy guard who is tough defensively that can play the 3.We need someone in place of AP. I think he can play a role and contribute in year 2. But next to that back court, defense will be atrocious again if AP is playing with two potential defensive liabilities. . We really need a an athletic big guard or wing to throw in the mix.
Saw a Collective email today, said we have 2 slots, they cannot be counting walk-ons.
Could be because of foul trouble. He had the 2nd most fouls on the team, and a good amount of 3, 4, and even 5 foul games.He seem to put up good numbers, but for some reason was coming off the bench and only getting 20 minutes a game for a below .500 Indiana State team - any concern there? Why was that the case? If he was so efficient - why not get the start? Why not get up to 30 minutes?
I like him on paper right now, but as with all transfers - its a wait and see.
He seem to put up good numbers, but for some reason was coming off the bench and only getting 20 minutes a game for a below .500 Indiana State team - any concern there? Why was that the case? If he was so efficient - why not get the start? Why not get up to 30 minutes?
I like him on paper right now, but as with all transfers - its a wait and see.