Ha! Ha! I'll be 70 next month. My parents started taking me to games as an infant. I remember when our home court was Benedictine's gym. Went on my Dad's tickets until I got out of college in 1970 and started buying my own.
Yep and Johnny Newman is the best player ever to take the floor for UR and (yes I will hear about this in more than one place), arguably the best player ever to play D1 ball in RVA (there was a guy at VUU and a VCU guy that might have a beef with my opinion). An absolute monster ending up as a lock to have a long successful NBA career. Wish every one of you could have been there to see that super smoooooth dude play. Could score at will and The Man when it absolutely had to happen.What was included in the original post was “I had to actually see them play”. So the original poster can be forgiven.
Subsequent posters made an assumption about what time period that was and bound themselves by it arbitrarily.
I remember Michael Perry from the ECAC South days. He was a prolific scorer and he would be one of my wings. Kevin Anderson at PG with Curtis Blair by his side. Johnny Newman would add to the multi-dimensional wings and I would go smaller with Pete Woolfolk down low. Pete was able to handle big men by hammering them with his big body. Let's run and gun.
Kevin Anderson
Curtis Blair
Michael Perry
Johnny Newman
Pete Woolfolk
Well, Grant has played one season. I love his scoring but down low he gets beat on D and Buck led the team in rebounds last season. Love the fact that GG can shoot from distance to spread the floor but to be a winner you need to be tough down low. Pete made up for his lack of height with an innate ability to be in the correct position. He was tough down there and he averaged 18 pts and 9 boards his senior season. That is why I would take Woolfolk.Swap out Kenny Atkinson for Kevin and you really have gone "old school". I like your line up except for the size, I agree Pete was a monster down low, but not sure I wouldn't swap out. What about Grant (I know its early), BiIl Flye, or even Steve Kratzer?
On offense he was. My all-time team needs toughness and D.Woolfolk was great ... awesome senior year.
but you're comparing senior year Woolfolk to freshman year Golden.
freshman Golden > freshman Woolfolk.
just saying Woolfolk developed, just as Golden will.On offense he was. My all-time team needs toughness and D.
Sure. One season does not make a player. People tend to forget the term sophomore slump. I doubt Golden will have much a slump but he is on an island down low his season so it will tax him.just saying Woolfolk developed, just as Golden will.
Woolfolk averaged 6 rpg as a freshman and just 4.6 rpg as a soph.
he became special after that.
You know I would disagree with your placement of players, but not the players. Woolfolk at the 5 and Perry at the 4 and Newman at the 3. Perry though shorter than Newman was a banger and better in and around the lane then out on the wing. Newman was a much better outside shooter than MP.I remember Michael Perry from the ECAC South days. He was a prolific scorer and he would be one of my wings. Kevin Anderson at PG with Curtis Blair by his side. Johnny Newman would add to the multi-dimensional wings and I would go smaller with Pete Woolfolk down low. Pete was able to handle big men by hammering them with his big body. Let's run and gun.
Kevin Anderson
Curtis Blair
Michael Perry
Johnny Newman
Pete Woolfolk
I did not really place them in positions although I went two guards, two wings and a center to set picks, rebound and play tough. The guards and wings can move inside and out. I am going with positionless basketball with my five. That is why I said multi-dimensional wings. I am not going with the PG, SG, SF, PF, C labels. Heck, Johnny Newman can bring the ball up for my all-time team.You know I would disagree with your placement of players, but not the players. Woolfolk at the 5 and Perry at the 4 and Newman at the 3. Perry though shorter than Newman was a banger and better in and around the lane then out on the wing. Newman was a much better outside shooter than MP.
by far the weakest part of his game.Heck, Johnny Newman can bring the ball up for my all-time team.
He did not get three unless it was a And One so why not step back from the elbow? I would not make a habit of him bringing it up but letting him create off the dribble from time to time would be fine.by far the weakest part of his game.
JNew was awesome here but I'm still amazed at his NBA career.
tough enough for a 2nd rounder to make it at all. yet he went on for 16 years. that's really rare. and honestly, he didn't shoot well from 3 (hit 0.5 per game), didn't rebound, and didn't handle. he just hustled like crazy and attacked the rim whenever possible. probably a great locker room guy too.
huh?He did not get three unless it was a And One so why not step back from the elbow?
When Johnny played there was not a 3 point line.huh?
ah. I gotcha. but my whole post was about his NBA career.When Johnny played there was not a 3 point line.
Maybe not high volume, but 33.6% from 3 for NBA total.by far the weakest part of his game.
JNew was awesome here but I'm still amazed at his NBA career.
tough enough for a 2nd rounder to make it at all. yet he went on for 16 years. that's really rare. and honestly, he didn't shoot well from 3 (hit 0.5 per game), didn't rebound, and didn't handle. he just hustled like crazy and attacked the rim whenever possible. probably a great locker room guy too.