ADVERTISEMENT

JOC Conference Prediction

So once you get the label 'young team' you stay there forever?

Speaking of is young purely an age/class, or is it experience/minutes played? Which is more accurate?
 
Dayton isn't going to finish 8th place. If they do I will be totally shocked. Umass is ranked too high.
 
Just at a quick glance my thoughts are URI too low and UMass too high.

URI may be a little low but I would not be surprised if they finished 10th. They have a new coach and they lost ~75% of their team. URI's drop will probably be similar to Dayton's this past year who lost their coach and ~75% of their team and went from 1st to 9th.
 
Young team is both - by age and experience. And experience is mainly minutes played in games.

We are young and inexperienced because of the loss of Buckingham and Fore. You basically have Gilyard, Golden, and Sherod returning. Each played over 30 minutes a game. After that - you are left with Johnson (15 minutes), and Cayo (12).

I think Johnson is a bench player- and 15 minutes off the bench is his ceiling. Cayo is young so who knows at this point.

Plain and simple - we need 3 newcomers to step up and be ready to play from game 1, and that is asking a lot. We are normally at our best when we just need 1 newcomer to contriibute, maybe 2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: urfan1
I have absolutely no feel for where we may end up. We return three starters who posted good offensive numbers but struggle a fair bit on defense. We don’t have clear options to replace the two starters we lost.

So 6th sounds sorta kinda right. But we could also end up 11th. So, yeah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSpider
Dayton isn't going to finish 8th place. If they do I will be totally shocked. Umass is ranked too high.
Dayton's Anthony Grant is Mooney II. If you ever watch him coach a game you will be unimpressed. They are not going to be that good unless another Kevin Anderson plus friends show up on their campus.
 
I found it interesting that they mentioned Gilyard and Grant and not Sherrod. NS is an efficient of scorer as there is in the A10. I expect a "breakout" year for NS and for him and GG to lead us in scoring. I think NS and GG will be competing for 1st team A10 and the other will be on 2nd team. They could both be 1st team but the team would have to place in the Top 3 and i dont see that happening. Gilyard on 3rd team is certainly a possibility too. I think NS and GG are two if the Top 10 players in the league with JG in the 15-20 range. A terrific trio but outside of them its unknown... at best.
Barring injuries to our top 3 players, i see a 4th or 5th place finish +/- one slot.
 
I found it interesting that they mentioned Gilyard and Grant and not Sherrod. NS is an efficient of scorer as there is in the A10. I expect a "breakout" year for NS and for him and GG to lead us in scoring. I think NS and GG will be competing for 1st team A10 and the other will be on 2nd team. They could both be 1st team but the team would have to place in the Top 3 and i dont see that happening. Gilyard on 3rd team is certainly a possibility too. I think NS and GG are two if the Top 10 players in the league with JG in the 15-20 range. A terrific trio but outside of them its unknown... at best.
Barring injuries to our top 3 players, i see a 4th or 5th place finish +/- one slot.
I noticed Sherod's absence as well as odd thoughts on other team's rosters, so I didn't post until I had another prediction to piggy back off of. :D
 
I found it interesting that they mentioned Gilyard and Grant and not Sherrod. NS is an efficient of scorer as there is in the A10. I expect a "breakout" year for NS and for him and GG to lead us in scoring. I think NS and GG will be competing for 1st team A10 and the other will be on 2nd team. They could both be 1st team but the team would have to place in the Top 3 and i dont see that happening. Gilyard on 3rd team is certainly a possibility too. I think NS and GG are two if the Top 10 players in the league with JG in the 15-20 range. A terrific trio but outside of them its unknown... at best.
Barring injuries to our top 3 players, i see a 4th or 5th place finish +/- one slot.
This is not intended as a slap at Sherod, so please don't take it that way. But, Sherod has NOT been an elite player in the A-10. He is quite capable of scoring outbursts, and it is POSSIBLE that he could have a breakout year this season. Up to this point though, his overall performance has been consistently inconsistent.

Sherod's defense has been well below were it needs to be. He hasn't shown the ability to handle the ball, or pass at anywhere near an elite level. He did rebound fairly well for a small forward, but he has not been exceptional in that area either.

If Sherod demonstrates significant improvement in all areas this season then he could be considered one of the top players in the conference. But to assume that he is already there, or that he WILL automatically rise to that level is overly optimistic.
 
This is not intended as a slap at Sherod, so please don't take it that way. But, Sherod has NOT been an elite player in the A-10. He is quite capable of scoring outbursts, and it is POSSIBLE that he could have a breakout year this season. Up to this point though, his overall performance has been consistently inconsistent.

Sherod's defense has been well below were it needs to be. He hasn't shown the ability to handle the ball, or pass at anywhere near an elite level. He did rebound fairly well for a small forward, but he has not been exceptional in that area either.

If Sherod demonstrates significant improvement in all areas this season then he could be considered one of the top players in the conference. But to assume that he is already there, or that he WILL automatically rise to that level is overly optimistic.

Not too go FAN2011 on you, but you're dead wrong. He was much better last year than Freshman year. In his sophomore year, His scoring average improved every month last year. . So that means he was better in February than November. So I believe the track record is there that Nick is a kid that works on his game and his two year record proves that he is a better play today than November 2016.


He was 12th in the A10 in conference scoring, 11th in A10 in conference game 3 point shooting , 10th in Field Goals Per Game, 18th in rebounding per game.

I don't know what you use to define elite, but I would not call that "consistently inconsistent"
 
The prognostications of either 6, 7 or 12 are irrelevant! Unless this team becomes a "Do you believe in miracles"?!!( ala US Olympic Hockey Team) we are doomed to a NCAA miss for the 8th straight year. We have 4 players with significant experience all of whom have various limitations along with too many unknowns with newcomers. To expect more than 16-14(at best) is denying reality.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Not-A-Homer
not that I care about rankings, but I wouldn't rank us high either. outside of our big 3, there's nobody we can be sure of ... all unproven and unheralded (except Sal and we don't know how ready he'll be). but the unproven guys might be good.

we just need a few of these guys. Noah's likely a piece. Nathan too, and I think he takes the leap that it looks like he might take. or if Sal is ready. maybe the red shirt year was huge for Tomas and Bryce. Julius should have his best year, but maybe Wojcik turns out better. nothing we can do but wait and see for now. who knows what Andre is until we see him. we just need a couple to be really solid.

if we have a good year, everyone banks the year of experience, and we add Francis ...we'll be very highly ranked next year.
 
I have no clue about expectations due to all the unknowns. If Francis was playing now I would have more confidence. I want to see improved shooting with more available shooters on the floor. I want to see more depth for once. Lastly I want better defense where improved rebounding is a big part of it.

My wish list just has too many unproven players and there is only a small sliver of proven team chemistry.
 
yeah, I want to see better defense too. something was missing last year. I don't believe it was the scheme.
 
Not too go FAN2011 on you, but you're dead wrong. He was much better last year than Freshman year. In his sophomore year, His scoring average improved every month last year. . So that means he was better in February than November. So I believe the track record is there that Nick is a kid that works on his game and his two year record proves that he is a better play today than November 2016.


He was 12th in the A10 in conference scoring, 11th in A10 in conference game 3 point shooting , 10th in Field Goals Per Game, 18th in rebounding per game.

I don't know what you use to define elite, but I would not call that "consistently inconsistent"
You are correct, scoring is part of the game.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT