Does not prove anything if it does. You could call a guy like Burton a"PF" if you want, so how could you ever be wrong with this statement? We got our PG and big this year. I would hope we are taking the best 5 players possible next class, especially with some 3 pt guys. It would be foolish to turn down a 6'2 guy who can shoot the lights out because we needed to add an old school PF type just to make sure we got one at each old school position. You can call a guy like Nick a G or F, or an old school SF, but his outside shooting is what keeps him on the floor. We should not complete our class with a "SF" who can't shoot just to make sure we have a guy at each position.
Do you not agree that the game has changed and you need more shooters on the floor now? Your previous text made it sound like you were agreeing with me when you said we can get 2 PGs or 2 bigs and call them something else. Who cares what we call them, although guys are just called Gs and Fs now anyway.