Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have to scroll down to the next page to find VCU.seems to show SOS isn't holding anyone back. just win.
Also our Non conference SOS is a full hundred plus better than VCU's according to the NET. So, hmmm.Have to scroll down to the next page to find VCU.![]()
I'm not understanding how this works.
shouldn't all your records in the quadrants add up to your total record?
Here are the Quads. I can't figure that out either.
Quadrant 1: Home 1-30, Neutral 1-50, Away 1-75.
Quadrant 2: Home 31-75, Neutral 51-100, Away 76-135.
Quadrant 3: Home 76-160, Neutral 101-200, Away 135-240.
Quadrant 4: Home 161-353, Neutral 201-353, Away 241-353.
This link has the proper quadrant records...
http://warrennolan.com/basketball/2020/schedule/Richmond
Not to the committee.what does it mean anyway? it doesn't make us #22 or Stanford #9. Polls matter, right?
I don't think the selection committee takes the polls into consideration. They are largely beauty contests from either media and/or coaches. And can be manipulated as such.what does it mean anyway? it doesn't make us #22 or Stanford #9. Polls matter, right?
Which computer rating influences the NCAA committee the most nowadays?NET has us ranked higher than any other computer ranking https://www.masseyratings.com/cb/compare.htm. Our schedule has not been computer friendly, it has been NET friendly. Maybe Lunardi knows something
The NET is the tool the NCAA designed to replace the RPI to help them seeding and at large bids.Which computer rating influences the NCAA committee the most nowadays?
That may be different from which one is most accurate in predictive value.
As long is that isn’t the quote of the guy who fell off a 14 story building as he passed the fifth floor...So far, so good!
VCU beats Missouri State and moves from 1 vote to 21. We beat Charleston and remain the same. I mean WTF. Is anyone even trying to do their jobs here?Still buried in the Top 25 voting:
Others receiving votes:
North Carolina 41, Xavier 40, Wichita State 31, Purdue 30, Liberty 25, Marquette 23, Indiana 23, Virginia Commonwealth 21, Utah State 14, Saint Mary's 13, Northern Iowa 12, Colorado 12, Texas 10, Florida 7, DePaul 6, Georgetown 3, Richmond 3, Virginia Tech 3, LSU 3, Stanford 3, Seton Hall 3, Oklahoma State 2, Duquesne 1, BYU 1, Arkansas 1
It appears the local PBS guy gave us, 3 points, Duquesne 1, VCU 0.VCU beats Missouri State and moves from 1 vote to 21. We beat Charleston and remain the same. I mean WTF. Is anyone even trying to do their jobs here?
I humbly disagree. The Final NET is determined by a number of factors including strength of schedule. There is only a couple games left for most teams before conference play starts, which means that this recent NET ranking is vitally important in helping our strength of schedule in conference play. With 3 A10 teams in the top 25 and 7 in the top 72, our strength of schedule should be pretty high.Much ado about nothing. I reviewed the NET rankings and I think throwing darts at a list of all the DIV 1 teams is just about as accurate. Of course, it is very early in the season, the NET will get better, and the final iteration is the one that matters.
Much ado about nothing. I reviewed the NET rankings and I think throwing darts at a list of all the DIV 1 teams is just about as accurate. Of course, it is very early in the season, the NET will get better, and the final iteration is the one that matters.
I am not a statistics expert, but something tells me that a sample size should be more than 1.Below is from an article about the original NET rankings from last year, which came out earlier than they did this year. Even though it was heavily criticized, it identified the two teams in the Natl Championship, 3 of 4 in the Final 4......
And UR is in the Top 10.....now I get it.Well that's all we have right now. There is zero supporting evidence to your claim that the NET means nothing at this point in the season. But there is evidence from last year that the teams ranked in the Top 10 of the original NET went on to have very good seasons.