True. I've always thought that philosophy is counterproductive. Sad that we've seemed to employ that strategy on a regular basis. It seems to come back & bite you. It certainly proved true last night.Originally posted by 97spiderfan:
Originally posted by spider23:
97spiderfan, so true. I am sitting at a bar watching the game next to a 70 year old guy that does not know who Dr. J or Clyde Drexler is, and all of the sudden he asks why Richmond is not trying to win the game. I did not say anything to him, but he asks why we did we stop attacking and looking to score any more? We couldn't get a defensive rebound and yes, we did go into our classic Play Not to Lose mode. Bad and this was what caused us to under perform in OOC.
23, My dad called me after the game and he has not watched a game of ours all year. But his first words, were, you guys played not to lose the game.
You did see many times this season & last night DT & TD on the court at the same time (and not just at end of game), didn't you?Originally posted by MrTbone:
K, that's four scorers. I'm just saying that folks like to complain that we don't have the right personnel on offense at times but that wasn't the case tonight.
Of course I've seen that, we absolutely have that lineup on the court, a lot. We had that lineup on the court when we were suffocating Miami in the first half and they scored 18 points. Sometimes it works.Originally posted by SpiderGuy:
You did see many times this season & last night DT & TD on the court at the same time (and not just at end of game), didn't you?Originally posted by MrTbone:
K, that's four scorers. I'm just saying that folks like to complain that we don't have the right personnel on offense at times but that wasn't the case tonight.
Best post of this thread. Articulated well with supporting facts that 1) don't come with a bias and 2) the facts you layed out do matter, can't be disputed, and can't be taken out of contect unless someone is looking for excuses.Originally posted by URParrothead:
I'm more of a casual reader of these boards and don't post much, if at all. I'm sure that I'm opening myself up to the slings and arrows of being a reactionary/uninformed/pessimistic etc. fan, but I'm starting to feel like the Mooney regime has run its course. This season has given plenty of evidence that points back to the head coach.
8-12 in games decided by 6 points or less and blew an 18 pt. 2nd half lead to close the season.
291st (def)/343rd(off) in the nation in rebounding average (per espn.com)
4-9 on the road, first road win (not neutral court) was on JANUARY 31st.
Abysmal FT shooting down the stretch in key games
Yes, the players play, but the coaching staff has to own these too.
We have quite a bit of a track record to assess Mooney's tenure. I've been very supportive of him over the years and do think he is a good coach. However, I'm starting to feel like he is what he is at this point. Good coach, runs a clean program that graduates players who represent UR well. His system is interesting and it plays well against mid-major teams and the occasional Power Conference foe. Every 3-4 years, if things break right, we have a shot at an NCAA birth.
I am just getting tired of being a 19-12/.500ish team year after year and aspire to be better. I'm to the point where we need to consider looking for the next great coach. Being 'Giant Killers' is a fantastic legacy that we are all proud of, but the NCAA landscape has changed. There is no reason, with our resources (facilities/academics/$$), that we can't follow the path of Gonzaga, Wichita St., VCU, etc. and become a consistently high performing program that gets single digit seeds in the tourney.
Change is tough and it doesn't always work out, but I'd rather strive to go to the next level than to mire a little above mediocrity for another 8 years.