What is interesting is I have been replying to EL and EL only. People that don't know or weren't involved in past debates with us should stay the heck out of it. I'm sure EL can take care of himself. Sorry, but if EL or anyone replies to my posts and thinks they know everything and criticizes my opinions during a debate, I will defend myself, and yes, when someone talks down to you like they know everything and you know nothing, and they get proven wrong, I think it is perfectly acceptable to point that out. Just like plenty of others do here.
Look at the past several posts on here. All because I had a back and forth with EL? Fine, get on me. Heck, you even have SDad liking a post that got on me, so congrats to those of you that get bothered by me on turning another guy against me. I would like to ask SDad what it is he thinks I have been wrong about so often since he liked a post that said just that. I could not care less what most of the others on here think, but I do like sharing thoughts with SDad so hopefully he can tell me what it is I am so wrong about a lot.
So, why, instead of maybe questioning why so many other people criticized and got on me for my thoughts, you got on me for being "argumentative"? As if EL hasn't been argumentative? As if about 30 people on here aren't argumentative at times. So, don't get on the arrogant guy who was proven wrong, and don't get on the guy who said our assistant coach should be selling knives or on a Mormon mission. Because that is all cool right? But, hey, all good to get on me again, right? Whatever.