You are failing to understand the way science works. No one in the scientific or medical community GUARANTEED that anything would or wouldn't happen. What they said and wrote at the onset of this thing and have continued to update essentially is this: "Given what we know right now about this virus – which we admit is far from all there is to know – leads us to believe that the possible outcomes are [XYZ] if a majority of people do [A] or [123] if a majority of people do [C]."Yes, because the same people whose models have been laughably wrong regarding what has actually happened must be totally accurate about predicting theoretical stuff that never even happened at all.![]()
You are failing to understand the way science works. No one in the scientific or medical community GUARANTEED that anything would or wouldn't happen. What they said and wrote at the onset of this thing and have continued to update essentially is this: "Given what we know right now about this virus – which we admit is far from all there is to know – leads us to believe that the possible outcomes are [XYZ] if a majority of people do [A] or [123] if a majority of people do [C]."
Actual death rate is the most solid data point we have right now and the one we need to be monitoring the closest. So far, so good.
Guessing that graph is going to look a little different soon, since Florida just reported the most cases in a single day so far, and now they and Texas are closing up restaurants again after having just opened them. I hope I'm wrong, but we have a decent grasp at this point as to how many cases = how many hospitalizations = how many deaths.I actually have a degree in science from the U of R, so I understand science perfectly fine thank you. You don't seem to understand how modeling works. If you can't design a model that accurately predicts the real world future then you certainly aren't going to be able to design a model that accurately predicts a completely hypothetical past. Garbage in, garbage out. Actual death rate is the most solid data point we have right now and the one we need to be monitoring the closest. So far, so good. All the rioting and protests could cause a short term blip in the near future, but curve seems to be effectively flattened. ICU beds and hospitalizations are equally flat.
![]()
Guessing that graph is going to look a little different soon, since Florida just reported the most cases in a single day so far, and now they and Texas are closing up restaurants again after having just opened them. I hope I'm wrong, but we have a decent grasp at this point as to how many cases = how many hospitalizations = how many deaths.
How about this data? Or, do you think this is just "mindless media propaganda"?
https://www.newsweek.com/arizona-ad...rus-cases-eu-reports-icus-are-89-full-1515007
Do you really not think a dramatic increase in cases will lead to an increase in hospitalizations and deaths? Wow, speaking of mindless.
Have we heard from Webspinner recently?understand, can read and hear and know we are in the target area other than we are in good health and have no pulmonary probs either. so far the flu is killing thousands again this year, like every year and nobody talks about that. this is just not the killer that some virus strains are, like ebola, and for that we can be thankful. think this has been blown way out of proportion compared to the swine flu a few years ago which killed thousands of americans and over 20000 were infected. we did not go crazy back then but we are now. have to ask why? pretty sure i know why but everyone can figure it out on their own.
That you can not even conceive of a scenario where dramatic increase in cases doesn't lead to increase in hospitalizations and deaths shows just out of your depth you are in this discussion. Leave science to the scientists.
Shafer,
You are too worried about percentages. Percentages don't save lives. It's a given that the more cases we get, the more hospitalizations and deaths we will get. It is also a given that states like Arizona will have more deaths than they should if they run out of room in their ICUs. Celebrate a lower death rate all you want, but the focus should be on the number of cases, and it is an absolute disaster that the cases have gone up like they have. Had we controlled the amount of cases better, we could have lowered the death rate much more. But, we have a clueless dumbass in charge who continues downplay the virus and botch everything he does along with a clueless VP and administration who continues to follow along with the dunbass like puppets. We closed too late and reopened too soon. Anyone with any common sense could have done better.
In Florida, 6X increase in cases from March has resulted in half as many deaths total. So you are completely off base. Dramatic increase in cases has indeed resulted in lower hospitalizations and lower deaths. Countries in Europe such as Spain, UK, and France who had stricter lock downs than your Orange Man had far more deaths per captia than we did.
![]()
deSanitis has been cooking the books since he fired the expert record keeper.Everyone in the know should know this.
Rebekah Jones, Florida’s fired coronavirus data scientist, publishes her own dashboard
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/06/12/rebekah-jones-florida-coronavirus/
Also, Shafer cherry picked a few countries who have worse death rates per capita then ours to try to make a point, but he is ignoring the fact that we have one of the worst death rates per capita in the whole world. Johns Hopkins showed research from about a month ago, about the same time dumb ass Trump was saying we and Germany are doing the best, and it showed that we had the 11th highest death rate per capita out of over 140 countries researched.
I prefer to look at the situation in total and acknowledge our realities.
Our context is an over abundance of obesity and diabetes that had us effectively leaning into the Covid left hook.
That is assuming 100% case detection.So Agent Orange says 99% covid no problem.
Let’s see Dr Dolt’s math.
2.8 million cases in US with 130,000 deaths.
Seems like there has been a 4.7% death rate.T
Agent Orange did not do well in arithmetic even while he attended Silver Spoon Elementary School or Penn Wharton(daddy got him in since he can’t either read or write).
https://news.sky.com/video/trump-99...s-and-china-must-be-held-accountable-12021503
You can call it an ice cream cone if you want. But there is nothing racist about naming a virus after the region where it came. It’s silly and most wouldn’t give it a second thought if the media hadn’t used it as another tool against the POTUS. Which puzzles me- he gives them enough ammunition as it is, why reach?