ADVERTISEMENT

Secret Scrimmage vs ECU 90-90

Maybe needs it own thread - but what has gone wrong this year. I will admit - I had some excitement about this team entering the season. I thought we had a decent core coming back led by DLO, and then support by Roche, Tyne, and Walz. And I thought the addition of GW3, Neskovic, Beagle, and Apostolos - would produce at least 1 if not 2 high impact producers to support DLO. But it just had not happened. We have not seen GW3 and Apostolos, coming from UCONN, has not lived up to expectations I had. But this is a gamble in taking transfers, especially at the higher level - who may not have played - but were well touted/recruited out of HS - they might not live up to that original rating or expectation. Just seems like to me we may have struck out on all of them at the same time. And struck out might be too harsh - Beagle and Neskovic are okay, but we needed more than okay from the portal this year to keep up - and just seems we are not getting it as of now.
 
How about just 5 from 30%?

Our top 5 volume 3 guys are at 49%, 28%, 24%, 23%, and 22%. Yikes!!!!!!!!
I agree. But looking at the scrimmages, it appeared we had lots of shooters…

And I think if you only count D1, that 49% may be 40.7%
 
Last edited:
Counting only our 5 high volume guys, only Roche and Dusan are better if you take away D2 games.

Hunt was 1-5 from 3 against D2 teams.
Tyne 2-10.
Dusan 3-7.
AP 0-8.
Roche 9-14.
 
what’s the scouting process for portal guys who have minimal D1 game minutes? Are coaches basically looking at footage of them from high school and whatever nominal tape there is of them at their current school?

Just trying to figure out how much is they are mid-assessed versus unable to assess these guys. It seems weird that they’d mis-assess this many guys at once.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT