ADVERTISEMENT

Off the Dole

tarrantula

Graduate Assistant
Gold Member
May 8, 2003
6,166
0
0
Ever since reading Spinner's treatise on "The Need To Abolish Social Security", I've got to admit that I've been a bit nervous. I look forward to my check each month and would be hard pressed to do without it. Today, my anxiety rose another notch. While thumbing through Stephen Colbert's "I Am America, So Can You" I came across that commentator's essay on the same topic. I had taken Spinner's preoccupation with the subject as just idle fancy that maybe arose from inhaling noxious fumes while riding drag on one of those Texas cattle drives. Now, I see a famed TV personality preaching the same sermon. He even included a copy of a letter he wrote his Grandpa when he was 7, in response to the gift of a baseball glove purchased with "Unearned funds". I think that Colbert did at least a year of his college time at Hampden Sydney, so BillyWayne will probably vote with him and Spinner on the abolishment bill. This thing'll probably pass.

I'll turn 70 on the 5th of July. Although retired, I am still working an average of three days a week. I enjoy seeing the people, but seven hours in a courtroom and another hour signing huge piles of paperwork leaves me tired these days. The wearyness makes me cranky and my wife has threatened to take 39 years worth of birthday and anniversary presents and head out to one of those canasta casinos they call retirement homes if my disposition doesn't improve. Says she plans to take all 39 pairs of bedroom slippers and Bath Powder sets and start a specialty shop in the Resthome dayroom. She plans to use the proceeds to finance her new career as a professional Bingo Gamester.

That leaves me really worried, because she's the only person in this house who knows how to set the clock radio and without Blake Shelton blaring in my ear, I'd never wake up in time to get to court. I do have a second occupation to fall back on. I do weddings. Been doing them for almost 40 years. I've "performed" in public parks,barns, bistros(in one, the bride and the bridesmaids wore tee shirts. The brides shirt said "I have a perky trousseau!"

Also did my thing in a former Virginia Governor's home and the manor house of a pre Civil War Virginia Plantation where Jeb Stuart once mooned over a pretty cousin he admired. I also married the lady who was the Mom in "Free Willie" to another actor who played one of the regulars on "Murphy Brown". In that one we did the ceremony by a swimming pool and the 5 year old who was suposed to bring the rings forward on a pillow became bored and tossed pillow and rings into the pool. The actress who was the bride's attendant(and who was very well equiped to play the female lead in romantic movies) then said "I'm the bride's attendant, I'll get them" and dove into the pool. After swimming around for several minutes, she finally emerged with hands clutching the rings raised above her head in triumph like Botacelli's Venus. Unfortunately, (or not, depending upon your perspective) the water and the raised arms were too much for the strapless gown and the top part went plop and ended up around her waist. There was a moment of stunned silence...then, and I swear to you this is true, the groom stammered "Can I marry her instead?"

Looking back on all of this has raised my spirits. It occurs to me that I've probably married more women than Joseph Smith. Maybe if I write Mitt and tell him that, he'll think that I'm a Mormon and help me get a job on his pal Stephen Colbert's TV show. It ought to pay as least as much as I was getting from social Security.
 
T, that's a great read. Hope you don't totally retire as we still need some judges with common sense to hear cases. While I'm not a huge Colbert fan even thiough he is a Tiger alumnus, I must say that he and Spinner are probably right on that issue. I say that even though my date for drawing on the dole is just over the hill (as am I). I turn 64 two days after your birthday. So happy birthday to us!
This post was edited on 6/4 11:35 AM by BillyWayne
 
BW and Spinner. It scares me to death that you guys might be right. My wife and I paid into SS for approx. 45 years. The checks that we receive are not major amounts, but are a big help in handling our budget. The news all arround the world is very scary and the confidence that we are safe and secure in the US of A is very shaky these days. Both parties try to place the blame for this situation on the other. I believe that in one sense both are to blame and in another sense neither could have avoided the troubles of this era. We spend a great deal on benefits...we also spend a large chunk on "wars and rumors of wars". It's a chicken and egg question...we have to protect ourself from foreign enemies, but have we made bad decisions in some situations and spent way beyond what was needed. We have to try to insure the quality of life for our citizens that has been the envy of the world for most of the last century, but how do we pay for those packages. The "too much spending on social programs" verses "too little taxation on the wealthy" is like the "Great Taste" vs "Less Filling" debate in the beer commercial. I am not qualified to vouch myself as an expert on any of this, but I truly believe that until our two political parties put aside partisanship and sit down in a bipartisan fashion to examine solutions that will solve the looming crisis we will not find a solution. Meanwhile, I'm gonna write Colbert and see if he needs a new segment in his show titled..."Nuptual Nuances". I look forward to seeing you guys sometime this fall at the "Brick House". Spinner, let me know when you will be headed this way and I'll drop a note to our mutual friends and see if they will leave the country life for a trip to the big city.
This post was edited on 6/19 8:24 AM by tarrantula
 
T, am not against SS or any of the social programs although feel some aspects do more harm than good but these programs are broke or nearly there and something will have to be done. that is why i suggest a minimum 10% cut in all govt checks and direct deposits just to start. that hits active employees, including military, retired employees, SS, medicare payment, medicaid, welfare, govt contractors, etc, etc, EVERYONE!! just reduce that outpay. the govt will not allow private companies to run their businesses the way our govt runs their deal, they would close them down yet these clowns just keep on getting on and it has to stop. the foundation of the world economic mess is the real estate fiasco started by fannie and freddie and threatening bankers to make stupid loans. when the house of cards fell, we have this mess. the govt backing and guaranteeing all of this stuff is assinine.
 
T, I wouldn't worry about SS. The only way they will get ANY changes in this system will be if they "grandfather" everyone over the age of 55 or 60. Continue to enjoy your checks. Spinner is right, th4e system is broke, and if not changed, it has to fail.
 
an interesting idea and although pretty extreme it is worthy of discussion. One thing I believe needs to be done is we must broaden the tax base. The idea that roughly half the people in this country can be taxed at a rate high enough to fund the government while the other half either pays no taxes or receives a check is just plain bad policy. Continuing to raise taxes on the country's most productive is not a long term solution. Sure, it is easy to get a majority of people to raise taxes on the highest earners but the easy answers are not always the right ones. The people in this country desperately need to return to the values of taking care of themselves and their family and away from the mindset of bailouts and handouts. The idea that you work hard and sacrifice so that your children have a better life seems like an old-fashioned way of thinking, which is a shame.

This post was edited on 6/18 9:29 AM by URPike
 
and Noid, before you jump in and say the same should go for business, it should. if you run your business into the ground, the govt should not bail it out. rick wagoner, the ceo of GM should have declared bankruptcy, should never have let the govt do it and then hand the company over to them and the unions. sure, would be tough on lots of people to let some businesses fail but that is the way it should work. the govt bailout is the same as individuals depending on govt, they do as they please and then when they encounter probs, they know, expect govt to save them, if they did not have that attitude, they most likely would be more prudent in their actions. it is nice, heartwarming for the govt to always be there as a safety net but it sends the wrong message and allows all entities and individuals to rely, depend rather than living correctly, acting correctly day to day.
 
if one is indicted, tried and convicted, they should go to jail and that is how it works most of the time. would love to see investigations into fannie and freddie and for some career politicians to get theirs but, alas, will never see it. big, powerful people do not always go to jail no matter in which sector they are employed
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT