ADVERTISEMENT

Fire Mooney

Was about to pay the same thing. We suck at home. Cancel all remaining home games and move them to the road.

I know home court advantage is down nationally without fans, but this is ridiculous. We’ve really only had one pretty comfortable win at home this year.
 
Bad joke - but anyway - like a dead skunk, stink at home. (Other part of that is - get killed on the road - but that only happened at West Virginia)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eight Legger
Was about to pay the same thing. We suck at home. Cancel all remaining home games and move them to the road.

I know home court advantage is down nationally without fans, but this is ridiculous. We’ve really only had one pretty comfortable win at home this year.

Are we practicing in the practice facility not in the Robins Center......could that be an issue?
 
Are we practicing in the practice facility not in the Robins Center......could that be an issue?
Well it sounds like we weren’t practicing for the last two weeks at all...so I don’t think that’s a major consideration.
 
It seems like like free throws were practiced! I mean, it is really sad that it got overshadowed but 24-24 from the line is amazing. Kept the game close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathanw19
It seems like like free throws were practiced! I mean, it is really sad that it got overshadowed but 24-24 from the line is amazing. Kept the game close.
Maybe should’ve spent more time practicing three-pointers. We were 6 for 23 if you remove the two boondoggles that Grant got to go down late that he'd normally not take. That's 26%. They were by and large really good looks too. I meant wtf.
 
Was about to pay the same thing. We suck at home. Cancel all remaining home games and move them to the road.

I know home court advantage is down nationally without fans, but this is ridiculous. We’ve really only had one pretty comfortable win at home this year.

Who knew the sweater vest mafia was such a home court advantage.
 
The injuries to Gustafson and Crabtree, after Nick, that’s Mooney’s fault?
You guys really need a reality check.
Omg watch the games... he is clueless with in game adjustments, cant motivate his team against lesser competition and has NO strategy to combat a zone. He is a one trick pont and any decent coach has figured his tricks out.
 
Omg watch the games... he is clueless with in game adjustments, cant motivate his team against lesser competition and has NO strategy to combat a zone. He is a one trick pont and any decent coach has figured his tricks out.
Really? 24-7 last year and 9-4 this year, including 17-6 in the A-10 the past 2 years. Must be a lot of "below decent" coaches out there. I guess it's time for Wisky, Ky., Loyola, Davidson, VCU, and a few others to find other coaches?
 
Really? 24-7 last year and 9-4 this year, including 17-6 in the A-10 the past 2 years. Must be a lot of "below decent" coaches out there. I guess it's time for Wisky, Ky., Loyola, Davidson, VCU, and a few others to find other coaches?
Pretty sure all the teams you mentioned here have been to the NCAA tournament since 2011. VCU has done it with 3 coaches, Wisconsin 2.
 
Really? 24-7 last year and 9-4 this year, including 17-6 in the A-10 the past 2 years. Must be a lot of "below decent" coaches out there. I guess it's time for Wisky, Ky., Loyola, Davidson, VCU, and a few others to find other coaches?

You conveniently left out 25-40 the two years before that. Or if you want to do the 4 years before that he is...63-69.

I don’t know about you, but to me it is unacceptable for Richmond to have a losing record over a 4 year period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8legs1dream
You conveniently left out 25-40 the two years before that. Or if you want to do the 4 years before that he is...63-69.

I don’t know about you, but to me it is unacceptable for Richmond to have a losing record over a 4 year period.
Fair points. My reply, however, was to the post I copied. The one that said any decent coach has figured Mooney out. That's all. I realize we had some really bad years a few years ago, but you have to admit, reading the post I copied, you would think we were 11-33 and 6-17 in the A-10 the past two seasons, and not the other way around. I mean, you tell me how a clueless, non-motivating, non-adjusting, one trick pony of a coach beat coaches of the teams I mentioned?
 
Last edited:
Fair points. My reply, however, was to the post I copied. The one that said any decent coach has figured Mooney out. That's all.

Ashley Howard inherited a 13-19 team at LaSalle and in his very first season finished above Mooney in the A-10. He also beat Mooney in his first game against him. Mooney is 3-2 against Ashley Howard’s LaSalle teams. With how good our team and Mooney supposedly is, that number should be 5-0.

Mooney isn’t playing 5D chess, he’s not even playing checkers. He’s out here playing snakes and ladders. He goes up one small ladder then goes down one huge snake back to the start. The past 10 years he’s been playing. Trying to get to the end. And he just can’t do it.
 
Ashley Howard inherited a 13-19 team at LaSalle and in his very first season finished above Mooney in the A-10. He also beat Mooney in his first game against him. Mooney is 3-2 against Ashley Howard’s LaSalle teams. With how good our team and Mooney supposedly is, that number should be 5-0.

Mooney isn’t playing 5D chess, he’s not even playing checkers. He’s out here playing snakes and ladders. He goes up one small ladder then goes down one huge snake back to the start. The past 10 years he’s been playing. Trying to get to the end. And he just can’t do it.
I don't really understand this post, ply. I like Ashley Howard, and I think he was a great hire by LaSalle, but what is your point here? Did they beat us last game? Yes, and they looked good doing it. Did we beat them by 16 and 27 points last year? Yes. And we looked good doing it. Did their 10 win team split with our 13 win team 2 years ago? Yes. Seems about right. I'm just not sure what this proves in response to my post.
 
VT4700 - I think u know basketball which is why I think u know nobody should be propping up 9-4. Everyone knows 9-4 right now is an underachievement. Do you agree? Perhaps you don't and I give you too much credit. The players know it. They might not have after the Hofstra "we're still 7-2" game but they know it by now. It didn't work then, and "we're still 9-4" certainly doesn't work now. I expect Mooney deep down knows too even though you'd never know it publicly. The only 1 I'm uncertain about is our Big Hat No Cattle AD, Mr. Regatta.
 
VT4700 - I think u know basketball which is why I think u know nobody should be propping up 9-4. Everyone knows 9-4 right now is an underachievement. Do you agree? Perhaps you don't and I give you too much credit. The players know it. They might not have after the Hofstra "we're still 7-2" game but they know it by now. It didn't work then, and "we're still 9-4" certainly doesn't work now. I expect Mooney deep down knows too even though you'd never know it publicly. The only 1 I'm uncertain about is our Big Hat No Cattle AD, Mr. Regatta.
Yes, I agree we should be better than 9-4 right now. I think most everyone knows that. But, the season is not over, and we can turn things around. I just have a feeling 14-4 is where we need to be if we play all 18 conference games. I don't care how we get there this year, but 14-4 will put us in great shape going into the A-10 tourney. No, it won't be easy, but I think it's doable. And, no matter where we end up, I think we'll have a real good chance to win the tourney. Did we just lose a game we should have won? Yes. No question about it. Now, we just need to pick up a win that we thought might have been one of our losses.
 
Yes, I agree we should be better than 9-4 right now. I think most everyone knows that. But, the season is not over, and we can turn things around. I just have a feeling 14-4 is where we need to be if we play all 18 conference games. I don't care how we get there this year, but 14-4 will put us in great shape going into the A-10 tourney. No, it won't be easy, but I think it's doable. And, no matter where we end up, I think we'll have a real good chance to win the tourney. Did we just lose a game we should have won? Yes. No question about it. Now, we just need to pick up a win that we thought might have been one of our losses.

We are not playing 18 conf games

What's funny is we've heard Mooney talk about the Philadelphia Eagles underachieving in his interviews or shows easily half a dozen times but he won't look in the mirror himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whampas
We are not playing 18 conf games

What's funny is we've heard Mooney talk about the Philadelphia Eagles underachieving in his interviews or shows easily half a dozen times but he won't look in the mirror himself.
So if there is no A-10 Tourney what conference record will win the AQ?
 
So if there is no A-10 Tourney what conference record will win the AQ?

If I knew that I'd take Broc's $ out to Vegas. Not even sure how they'll determine if based on winning % or number of wins.
 
So if there is no A-10 Tourney what conference record will win the AQ?
Presumably winning percentage, although I don't know if there will be any consideration for a team like SLU playing drastically fewer games than anyone else. But I would guess just straight-up WP.
 
We are not playing 18 conf games

What's funny is we've heard Mooney talk about the Philadelphia Eagles underachieving in his interviews or shows easily half a dozen times but he won't look in the mirror himself.
We have VCU rescheduled, and still have March 6th for a makeup game. So, we only need one more somewhere. So, it's possible, but regardless, 1st or 2nd IC would look pretty good. We just need to start winning and get on a nice roll. As for Mooney, I think he definitely looks in the mirror every day and tries to make himself and the team better. It's the coaches who constantly throw players under the bus that I worry the most about holding themselves accountable.
 
VT, serious question. Can you name 1 adjustment CM made to make us better in the 2nd half of the LaSalle game? Interested what was discussed and implemented after half time.
 
Last edited:
Look - we all know the Pom-Pom crew isn’t going to be critical of Mooney no matter what. There’s always an excuse out there.

What scares me is the thought that we have enough talent, with our best class ever, that we’ll win some tough games down the stretch. We’ll be “finishing strong” and win like 10 or 11 games in conference. Folks will say that 10-6 is “really good” and that we overcame so much adversity with Nick being out, CoVid and whatever other excuse. As if we’re the only team in the country that faced any challenges. And the A10 will cancel the tournament and so will the NCAA and we’ll give Mooney credit for “he would have made it - 2 years in a row” and give him an extension because without it he wouldn’t be able to recruit. And anyone that questions it will be told “they aren’t a real fan”, to “shut up and make your donations”, etc. and it’ll continue with enough of the inner circle to keep all blame from coming back to Mooney. And then for the next two years “we’ll be young” so there will be no expectations of winning. But we’ll knock off davidson and a couple others, maybe we’ll beat an ACC team at a holiday tournament, and then it’s just more evidence that Mooney just needs more time. And it just doesn’t stop. Sorry for the long depressing post...
 
Look - we all know the Pom-Pom crew isn’t going to be critical of Mooney no matter what. There’s always an excuse out there.

What scares me is the thought that we have enough talent, with our best class ever, that we’ll win some tough games down the stretch. We’ll be “finishing strong” and win like 10 or 11 games in conference. Folks will say that 10-6 is “really good” and that we overcame so much adversity with Nick being out, CoVid and whatever other excuse. As if we’re the only team in the country that faced any challenges. And the A10 will cancel the tournament and so will the NCAA and we’ll give Mooney credit for “he would have made it - 2 years in a row” and give him an extension because without it he wouldn’t be able to recruit. And anyone that questions it will be told “they aren’t a real fan”, to “shut up and make your donations”, etc. and it’ll continue with enough of the inner circle to keep all blame from coming back to Mooney. And then for the next two years “we’ll be young” so there will be no expectations of winning. But we’ll knock off davidson and a couple others, maybe we’ll beat an ACC team at a holiday tournament, and then it’s just more evidence that Mooney just needs more time. And it just doesn’t stop. Sorry for the long depressing post...
No apologies necessary. Those are my worries as well. I swore after the James Madison loss a few years back that I would not darken the halls of the RC again until Mooney is gone. And I won't. I don't miss a game on radio or TV and I bleed red and blue but Mooney ball and our continued support of mediocrity is depressing.
 
Look - we all know the Pom-Pom crew isn’t going to be critical of Mooney no matter what. There’s always an excuse out there.

What scares me is the thought that we have enough talent, with our best class ever, that we’ll win some tough games down the stretch. We’ll be “finishing strong” and win like 10 or 11 games in conference. Folks will say that 10-6 is “really good” and that we overcame so much adversity with Nick being out, CoVid and whatever other excuse. As if we’re the only team in the country that faced any challenges. And the A10 will cancel the tournament and so will the NCAA and we’ll give Mooney credit for “he would have made it - 2 years in a row” and give him an extension because without it he wouldn’t be able to recruit. And anyone that questions it will be told “they aren’t a real fan”, to “shut up and make your donations”, etc. and it’ll continue with enough of the inner circle to keep all blame from coming back to Mooney. And then for the next two years “we’ll be young” so there will be no expectations of winning. But we’ll knock off davidson and a couple others, maybe we’ll beat an ACC team at a holiday tournament, and then it’s just more evidence that Mooney just needs more time. And it just doesn’t stop. Sorry for the long depressing post...

It'll be the year 2035 and you'll still be having these thoughts and feelings.
 
VT, serious question. Can you name 1 adjustment CM made to make us better in the 2nd half of the LaSalle game? Interested what was discussed and implemented after half time.
This is such a silly question. How about if you tell me what halftime adjustments Coach Cal and McKillop made against us. Then maybe I'll reply.
 
This is such a silly question. How about if you tell me what halftime adjustments Coach Cal and McKillop made against us. Then maybe I'll reply.

So you don’t have an answer. Because there were no adjustments.
 
regarding adjustments, I don't think I'd notice little things and we're not going to make major ones.

I know some of you prefer changing defenses when one isn't working. Mooney, like a ton of coaches, teaches and tries to perfect one defense. he may change in game how he wants to handle a ball screen for a particular player or something, but he's not going to suddenly whip out a 1-3-1. someone will point out that some do, like Beilein did at Neubauer's suggestion, but many great coaches don't change defenses.

offensively, we run a read and react type patterned offense with a lot of options based on what the defense does. I'd be concerned if we weren't getting good looks but I like most of the shots we get.

so maybe the roster, which I gave Mooney tons of credit for, is more flawed than I thought again. we don't get much production from the bench and our starters' offense isn't currently strong enough to offset their weaknesses on defense.

or maybe we'll go on a run and we'll forget all of this.
 
regarding adjustments, I don't think I'd notice little things and we're not going to make major ones.

I know some of you prefer changing defenses when one isn't working. Mooney, like a ton of coaches, teaches and tries to perfect one defense. he may change in game how he wants to handle a ball screen for a particular player or something, but he's not going to suddenly whip out a 1-3-1. someone will point out that some do, like Beilein did at Neubauer's suggestion, but many great coaches don't change defenses.

offensively, we run a read and react type patterned offense with a lot of options based on what the defense does. I'd be concerned if we weren't getting good looks but I like most of the shots we get.

so maybe the roster, which I gave Mooney tons of credit for, is more flawed than I thought again. we don't get much production from the bench and our starters' offense isn't currently strong enough to offset their weaknesses on defense.

or maybe we'll go on a run and we'll forget all of this.
Good post, Sman. I think it is very fair to say the roster is flawed right now. Think of what our bench could have looked like: Tyler, Andre, Crabtree, Sal, and Grace. When we were getting top 25 pre season love, that was our roster. Versatile and deep. No one could have predicted another ACL tear for Nick. We gave Crabtree a scholarship last year as a transfer, so clearly we were counting on him this year as well. Lately, with Goose hurt, our bench has been Sal, Grace, and Wilson, who we all hope will be good one day, but who clearly is not ready for A-10 ball this year. Getting Goose 100% healthy will be huge, but we pretty much need all of our starters to play well to win now. Fortunately, we have a really good starting five, so more often than not, they will all play well, but when one or two guys are off a little bit, it shows. It is what it is. We need to find a way to win a lot of games, and I think we still can. I've said all year it won't be easy, and I don't expect many easy victories, but these guys have the experience and talent to find ways to win. That's why I'm still holding out hope of a top two finish.
 
agreed this was set to be our deepest lineup I can remember, and then it fell apart. I think shortening the rotation up like we have is our best shot. but like you said ... one or 2 guys off in a short rotation is a disaster. Nate looked off Saturday right away. do you let him work it out and get it going, or pull him for Sal? tough call. I'm sure I'd stick with Nate too assuming he's healthy. he's been too good. maybe Goose can get more time but that was his first game back. I'm not sure what else we can tweak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VT4700
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT