ADVERTISEMENT

Atlantic 10 recruiting update

Why would you say that? Have you ever heard anyone other than message board guys saying this could be a possibility?
It has nothing to do with the message board. Hardt went on the radio and said (paraphrasing), "we are going to honor our commitment to Yates vis-a-vis his grant-in-aid."

I don't know how an AD can "honor their commitment" to an ineligible player and still make that scholarship available to someone else. I know Yates' case was unusual, but that would seem to open up a loophole for other schools to abuse.
 
It has nothing to do with the message board. Hardt went on the radio and said (paraphrasing), "we are going to honor our commitment to Yates vis-a-vis his grant-in-aid."

I don't know how an AD can "honor their commitment" to an ineligible player and still make that scholarship available to someone else. I know Yates' case was unusual, but that would seem to open up a loophole for other schools to abuse.
I agree that Yates is on scholarship for at least one more semester. I think how that scholarship is characterized is still murky.
If a player was temporarily ineligible, characterizing his scholarship as non-athletic, opens the door for abuse.
If a player has become permanently ineligible, I'm not sure how being on non-athletic scholarship opens that same door.

But then again, I am sure about very little, and could be missing something.
 
Correct. I think what's unconfirmed is if UR is treating his final year as if he is and paying his way, thus consuming the remaining scholarship spot. This is what folks are speculating on given the perceived lack of effort/interest in adding another guy this summer.
Here is JOC's tweet on April 30 confirming that we have 2 open schollies, one of which is Yates. I think it is pretty clear that Yates spot is open.

 
Are we really arguing whether we should just leave the 13th ship open? That is insanity.

Players get hurt, quit, transfer mid season etc... We have had all of the above in the past few years (Solly quit, Schneider transferred, Sherod had a season ending injury). And we are going to just say "Naw, we're good with 12", we don't need that 13th scholarship". We actually only have 11 because Crabtree will have to sit out, but hey I guess 11 is good too.

Filling out your 13 scholarship allotment is literally the most basic job requirement of a head coach and apparently Mooney is now getting a pass on that by some.

Going to find a serviceable grad transfer (not a JMA or Kweisi, because neither was servicable) who can provide us some minutes at the forward position is not that difficult, except it is seemingly impossible for Mooney and his crew of "yes men".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eight Legger
The bar keeps getting lower and lower for Mooney. It's great that the majority of this board sees it and are calling it out. If 4700 is a plant, he is should be fired immediately because all he is doing is coming up with more excuses and keeping the negative dialogue going strongly. I want coaches and fans that are searching for positives at Richmond, not making excuses. Unfortunately with Hardt and Mooney, we seem locked in to this modus operandi for the near future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpiderDaMan
If a player has become permanently ineligible, I'm not sure how being on non-athletic scholarship opens that same door.
Then every college could, in theory, offer a "needs-based" or "academic" scholarship for the second year to every incoming grad transfer. Maybe that already happens. Yes, I'm fully aware that 2/3 of MBB grad transfers don't even enroll in the second year.

We were "expecting" Yates' spot to open in 2020. Therefore, a grad transfer makes the most sense.That still leaves the scholarship open for a 2020 freshman.
 
The bar keeps getting lower and lower for Mooney. It's great that the majority of this board sees it and are calling it out. If 4700 is a plant, he is should be fired immediately because all he is doing is coming up with more excuses and keeping the negative dialogue going strongly. I want coaches and fans that are searching for positives at Richmond, not making excuses. Unfortunately with Hardt and Mooney, we seem locked in to this modus operandi for the near future.
Things will change for the better after the 2021-2022 season ends.
 
The bar keeps getting lower and lower for Mooney. It's great that the majority of this board sees it and are calling it out. If 4700 is a plant, he is should be fired immediately because all he is doing is coming up with more excuses and keeping the negative dialogue going strongly. I want coaches and fans that are searching for positives at Richmond, not making excuses. Unfortunately with Hardt and Mooney, we seem locked in to this modus operandi for the near future.
If Mooney starting showing up to work in his underwear, someone would make an argument as to how wearing pants is just too hard these days.
 
Let me preface this by saying odds are still much higher we have Yates ship. I believe JOC but possible he has bad info. He may be relying on info that has since changed. I'd like to see UR confirm it, or JOC write "according to UR" etc.

My speculation/theory is basically this...

We all know UR expected Yates to get 2 years. Should not have expected it, but they did. As a result they may have promised Yates 2 years during recruiting process. Even if they didn't, I think there would be some pressure at UR to want to have a grad transfer actually complete the degree. And getting a smart guy from Yale on MBA especially. Did Kwesi or JMA actually get a grad degree? Doubtful based on stats but who knows. UR has also been public about wanting NCAA to make the rule change requiring 2 athletic years for grad transfers. In order to look good they may have decided we need to be proactive about it ourselves first. Once NCAA said no on Yates eligibility they were kinda btw a rock and hard place. Athletics may have been under some pressure to show that grad transfers at UR are serious. Needed that notch under our belt, and who better than a Yale MBA!

Then u look at other circumstantial evidence. The Hardt radio interview. That was weird how he worded it. Weird dude tho. The fact that it is not easy to move from athletic aid to academic. There are no full MBA rides either only partials. Lastly Mooney has been in the grad market 3 straight years. He's not great at it by any means but he's been involved at least. And yet this year crickets.

Again this is all speculation but also I believe plausible. Of course I hope I'm dead wrong, we have the ship and we're still going to use to get a halfway decent grad transfer. All the alternatives are UR basketball malpractice imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eight Legger
You only get 13 scholarships, leaving one open is a neglect of the most basic duties that a college coaching staff has - coming off back to back 20 loss seasons and no NCAAs in 8 years, to not turn over every stone to find a player is absurd.

While I'm annoyed at our inability to fill out the last ship, I think it is MUCH more important that we got two quality guys with the other slots. I'll refer you to my old thread https://richmond.forums.rivals.com/threads/recruiting-in-the-bad-old-days.10946/ showing the recruiting classes that were largely responsible for our recent woes.

Our top two this year are Burton and Crabtree, which compares favorably to:

2015: Julius Johnson and Jesse Pistokache (best of 3)
2014: Khwan Fore and Paul Friendshuh (best of 4)
2013: Shawndre Jones and Josh Jones (best of 3)

Our recruiting still looks a lot better to me these days. All of the weak classes have graduated, so I'm cautiously optimistic that we will see a very different Richmond going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiderman
that does make sense, GK.

if we do have a spot ... there are 858 transfers this year, but much less in the grad transfer portal (and I'm not going to count them).
here are the grad transfers over 6'6" who are available and who averaged over 5 ppg last year.

Kerry Blackshear Jr 6-10 260 Va Tech averaged 15 and 7.5
Eric Hamilton 6-9 250 UNCG 6.1 ppg 4.4 rpg
Romani Hansen 6-8 200 Savannah St 9.5 ppg 5.5 rpg
Tyrell Harper 6-7 180 Savannah St 9.2 ppg 6.4 rpg
Kelvin Jones 6-11 230 Idaho St 9.9 ppg 5.6 rpg

that's all.

Blackshear is probably going to the highest of all high majors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VT4700
Let me preface this by saying odds are still much higher we have Yates ship. I believe JOC but possible he has bad info. He may be relying on info that has since changed. I'd like to see UR confirm it, or JOC write "according to UR" etc.

My speculation/theory is basically this...

We all know UR expected Yates to get 2 years. Should not have expected it, but they did. As a result they may have promised Yates 2 years during recruiting process. Even if they didn't, I think there would be some pressure at UR to want to have a grad transfer actually complete the degree. And getting a smart guy from Yale on MBA especially. Did Kwesi or JMA actually get a grad degree? Doubtful based on stats but who knows. UR has also been public about wanting NCAA to make the rule change requiring 2 athletic years for grad transfers. In order to look good they may have decided we need to be proactive about it ourselves first. Once NCAA said no on Yates eligibility they were kinda btw a rock and hard place. Athletics may have been under some pressure to show that grad transfers at UR are serious. Needed that notch under our belt, and who better than a Yale MBA!

Then u look at other circumstantial evidence. The Hardt radio interview. That was weird how he worded it. Weird dude tho. The fact that it is not easy to move from athletic aid to academic. There are no full MBA rides either only partials. Lastly Mooney has been in the grad market 3 straight years. He's not great at it by any means but he's been involved at least. And yet this year crickets.

Again this is all speculation but also I believe plausible. Of course I hope I'm dead wrong, we have the ship and we're still going to use to get a halfway decent grad transfer. All the alternatives are UR basketball malpractice imo.
"There are no full MBA rides either only partials." Is that a UR thing? an MBA thing? or all grad students?
I ask because I knew someone who was on an Athletic Scholarship at Georgetown, got published in the New England Journal of Medicine, then received an Academic Scholarship to Cambridge. Or so they said, I didn't have access to any of their records...
 
"There are no full MBA rides either only partials." Is that a UR thing? an MBA thing? or all grad students?
I ask because I knew someone who was on an Athletic Scholarship at Georgetown, got published in the New England Journal of Medicine, then received an Academic Scholarship to Cambridge. Or so they said, I didn't have access to any of their records...

I was only talking UR. Although I expect full MBA rides aren't prevalent elsewhere either. Cambridge on other hand I expect gives out a lot with all their grants etc. I doubt a Yale grad from Point Pleasant, NJ qualifies for financial aid either.

https://robins.richmond.edu/mba/admission/financial.html
 
that does make sense, GK.

if we do have a spot ... there are 858 transfers this year, but much less in the grad transfer portal (and I'm not going to count them).
here are the grad transfers over 6'6" who are available and who averaged over 5 ppg last year.

Kerry Blackshear Jr 6-10 260 Va Tech averaged 15 and 7.5
Eric Hamilton 6-9 250 UNCG 6.1 ppg 4.4 rpg
Romani Hansen 6-8 200 Savannah St 9.5 ppg 5.5 rpg
Tyrell Harper 6-7 180 Savannah St 9.2 ppg 6.4 rpg
Kelvin Jones 6-11 230 Idaho St 9.9 ppg 5.6 rpg

that's all.

Blackshear is probably going to the highest of all high majors.

Hey re: Blackshear Steve Thomas has all those VA Tech connections right? That's why we promoted him. But in all seriousness sman, this is why important to be in there early, I hope our coaches knew this. More grad guys do get added somewhat regularly though. While someone with size is ideal, go get a 6'5 or 6'6 guy who is tough defensively if you have to. Mooney wanted Yates back, that was clear. He wanted another guy in rotation. He knows only 10 guys is risky. A grad transfer could take Yates spot but play a slightly different role. No excuses.
 
Hey re: Blackshear Steve Thomas has all those VA Tech connections right? That's why we promoted him. But in all seriousness sman, this is why important to be in there early, I hope our coaches knew this. More grad guys do get added somewhat regularly though. While someone with size is ideal, go get a 6'5 or 6'6 guy who is tough defensively if you have to. Mooney wanted Yates back, that was clear. He wanted another guy in rotation. He knows only 10 guys is risky. A grad transfer could take Yates spot but play a slightly different role. No excuses.

10 guys is risky? Very few teams in college basketball go 10 deep. I'll ask the same thing I asked when we were discussing getting a big. What is appealing to a grad transfer to go to a team 10 deep and be the "tough defensively" guy?
 
10 guys is risky? Very few teams in college basketball go 10 deep. I'll ask the same thing I asked when we were discussing getting a big. What is appealing to a grad transfer to go to a team 10 deep and be the "tough defensively" guy?
If you've got 10 on the roster, "you go 10 deep." The question is, how good are they? Mooney's recruiting failures will most always show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GKiller
10 guys is risky? Very few teams in college basketball go 10 deep. I'll ask the same thing I asked when we were discussing getting a big. What is appealing to a grad transfer to go to a team 10 deep and be the "tough defensively" guy?
I’ll take the bait. We have 12 guys on roster. One isn’t eligible to play this year (Crabtree) and one seems to be largely a practice only player (Verbinskis). So we’re really talking about 10 game available players.

Let’s just stipulate that five guys are generally considered A10 capable starters (Golden, Gilyard, Cayo, Sherod and Francis). There are questions whether Sherod will be ready but presume he is.

It’s a stretch to feel super confident where out of 10 guys, one is coming off major survey, two have barely played, one has played but never as a spider and three have notable gaps somewhere in their game.

I’m not down on this crew ftr, but again, the notion that somehow a 13th player would have to get in line behind all those guys suggests we either can’t find a good guy or worse, we are so locked in on who is going to play that we’re not even considering making it competitive.
 
10 guys is risky? Very few teams in college basketball go 10 deep. I'll ask the same thing I asked when we were discussing getting a big. What is appealing to a grad transfer to go to a team 10 deep and be the "tough defensively" guy?

I didn't say 10 deep. Said 10 guys, technically it's 11. We are not 10 deep. Maybe 7.5 with potential for more. Gilyard, Golden, Sherod, Francis, Cayo, Wojcik, Gustavson, and Grace for spot back up minutes to Golden. Crabtree sitting out, Verbinskis can't count, Sal couldn't get time on a bad team last year with plenty of opportunity, & Burton is an unknown.

The tough defensively guy (or hopefully even more than that) well that's on the million dollar man, 14 year vet coach to sell. He sold Crabtree coming to program with coach on burning hot seat, grad transfer should be easy. He wanted Yates back that's a fact, so he's clearly not opposed to having another player in the mix. I mean who wouldn't besides yourself? 12 & 13 win seasons back to back, 8 year NCAA drought, we should be doing all we can to improve the roster. Want people fighting for playing time. And it's essentially a zero risk proposition with a grad transfer. Unless of course we are the only program in the country offering 2 years to play 1 as a grad!
 
  • Like
Reactions: spider23
I’ll take the bait. We have 12 guys on roster. One isn’t eligible to play this year (Crabtree) and one seems to be largely a practice only player (Verbinskis). So we’re really talking about 10 game available players.

Let’s just stipulate that five guys are generally considered A10 capable starters (Golden, Gilyard, Cayo, Sherod and Francis). There are questions whether Sherod will be ready but presume he is.

It’s a stretch to feel super confident where out of 10 guys, one is coming off major survey, two have barely played, one has played but never as a spider and three have notable gaps somewhere in their game.

I’m not down on this crew ftr, but again, the notion that somehow a 13th player would have to get in line behind all those guys suggests we either can’t find a good guy or worse, we are so locked in on who is going to play that we’re not even considering making it competitive.

Do you not think mid major grad transfers would have "gaps in their games" somewhere? Obviously, most of the decent ones are going P6. Why do you think these so called available grad transfers would be such a sure thing for us? And, why single us out? If it is so easy, why wouldn't every team in our conference just add grad transfers every year to be part of the rotation? I'll ask again: Why is our situation so attractive this year that a grad transfer should want to come here? We have 5 set starters, and 4 other guys that played last year. So, he is supposed to come here because maybe Nick won't be ready?

Do you really expect a grad transfer to leave his current situation, have one year of basketball left, and go to a team that has 5 clear starters, and could be 10 deep with no clue on how much playing time he would get? And, of course, never mind the fact that we won 13 games last year, and all we heard on here when Khwan left was grad transfers want to play in the dance. Having it both ways again? I thought most of you had a negative feel for how we would do this year. So, I guess some of you are suddenly assuming we will go dancing this year and a grad transfer should want to be a part of that?
 
I didn't say 10 deep. Said 10 guys, technically it's 11. We are not 10 deep. Maybe 7.5 with potential for more. Gilyard, Golden, Sherod, Francis, Cayo, Wojcik, Gustavson, and Grace for spot back up minutes to Golden. Crabtree sitting out, Verbinskis can't count, Sal couldn't get time on a bad team last year with plenty of opportunity, & Burton is an unknown.

The tough defensively guy (or hopefully even more than that) well that's on the million dollar man, 14 year vet coach to sell. He sold Crabtree coming to program with coach on burning hot seat, grad transfer should be easy. He wanted Yates back that's a fact, so he's clearly not opposed to having another player in the mix. I mean who wouldn't besides yourself? 12 & 13 win seasons back to back, 8 year NCAA drought, we should be doing all we can to improve the roster. Want people fighting for playing time. And it's essentially a zero risk proposition with a grad transfer. Unless of course we are the only program in the country offering 2 years to play 1 as a grad!

You said 10 guys after saying rotation, so I figured you meant 10 deep. But, we should be at least 9 and Burton could be 10, so interesting you came up with 7.5. Anyway, Crabtree has 3 years left after sitting out, so that is a lot different than trying to sell a grad transfer on playing time this year. The Yates example simply means he wanted a guy that played for us last year to play this year. Why wouldn't he? Again, way different than a likely mediocre grad transfer who has never played for us. And, I will say it again. If for some reason a good grad transfer thinks our situation is good for him, great, get him in here. But, in the likely scenario that does not happen, saving the ship for next year would not be a bad thing. I just don't see a lot of playing time for a grad transfer here this year because the good ones are either going P6 or going to a mid major where they have a good chance to start. Some of you do. We can disagree.

If we did sign someone, I think it is safe to say nearly all of you would be on here in the fall chewing out Mooney for wasting scholarships and ruining any chance we had to sign 2020 guys.
 
Do you not think mid major grad transfers would have "gaps in their games" somewhere? Obviously, most of the decent ones are going P6. Why do you think these so called available grad transfers would be such a sure thing for us? And, why single us out? If it is so easy, why wouldn't every team in our conference just add grad transfers every year to be part of the rotation? I'll ask again: Why is our situation so attractive this year that a grad transfer should want to come here? We have 5 set starters, and 4 other guys that played last year. So, he is supposed to come here because maybe Nick won't be ready?

Do you really expect a grad transfer to leave his current situation, have one year of basketball left, and go to a team that has 5 clear starters, and could be 10 deep with no clue on how much playing time he would get? And, of course, never mind the fact that we won 13 games last year, and all we heard on here when Khwan left was grad transfers want to play in the dance. Having it both ways again? I thought most of you had a negative feel for how we would do this year. So, I guess some of you are suddenly assuming we will go dancing this year and a grad transfer should want to be a part of that?
Here are my responses to your Basketball 101 Finals Quiz:
1. Do you not think mid major grad transfers would have "gaps in their games" somewhere?
A: Some will, some won't. What's your point?
2. Obviously, most of the decent ones are going P6.
A: Obviously? Ok, will presume that most all of them will, I already stated that, so what's your point.
3. Why do you think these so called available grad transfers would be such a sure thing for us?
A: I never said they would be, what's your point?
4. And, why single us out?
A: Where did I single us out? I said that it's situational, this would be true for us and any program.
5. If it is so easy, why wouldn't every team in our conference just add grad transfers every year to be part of the rotation?
A: I never said it was easy. If shit was easy, we'd all be skinny millionaires.
6. I'll ask again: Why is our situation so attractive this year that a grad transfer should want to come here?
A: I'll answer again and get free credit on this question twice. I never said we are attractive, I said it was situational. I actually don't think we're that attractive.
7. We have 5 set starters, and 4 other guys that played last year. So, he is supposed to come here because maybe Nick won't be ready?
A: We have 3 set starters, but all returning players. It's a crowded field to be sure. But I suspect there are a variety of players who have something to add to this team, and frankly, I wouldn't be scared at the chance of trying to beat out players 4-10 for playing time on a team that just lost 20 games.
8. Do you really expect a grad transfer to leave his current situation, have one year of basketball left, and go to a team that has 5 clear starters, and could be 10 deep with no clue on how much playing time he would get?
A: Awesome, another repeated question I can get credit for again. I don't think we are the best option but hell, we have absolutely no strong interior defender, there's one case right there where a guy could come here and immediately earn time.
9. And, of course, never mind the fact that we won 13 games last year, and all we heard on here when Khwan left was grad transfers want to play in the dance. Having it both ways again?
A: I'm not having anything both ways, I said that one of the reasons a guy would come here is if he thought the team had NCAA chances. You said that we should be top4 and in the hunt. I actually think that's ridiculous, but aren't you the one who's having it both ways? If we project that well, wouldn't a guy who wants to dance want to come here and push us over the top?
10. I thought most of you had a negative feel for how we would do this year. So, I guess some of you are suddenly assuming we will go dancing this year and a grad transfer should want to be a part of that?
A: Yet another repeat question. See answer to Q9.

Best quiz ever.
 
Mooney's sales pitch:

Hey, we absolutely suck on defense but we're pretty good on offense. You can be the missing piece to get us over the hump to dance. Please come save my job. I'll split half of my next 10 year extension with you. Thank you.
 
regarding depth, I think the staff believes Tomas will contribute. he looked good in the preseason video ... looked bad in his short time on the floor. but that was coming off injury.
I think he'd have moved on like Schneider and Ford if he didn't show something. I don't believe he's here to just be a practice player. good size and very good shooter.
 
regarding depth, I think the staff believes Tomas will contribute. he looked good in the preseason video ... looked bad in his short time on the floor. but that was coming off injury.
I think he'd have moved on like Schneider and Ford if he didn't show something. I don't believe he's here to just be a practice player. good size and very good shooter.
He looked awful in his minutes last year and when I've seen him in scrimmages. Schneider looked like he had much more potential (and that is saying something). Maybe this is all injury related and he is healthy now. Let us hope that is the case.

Right now, he reminds me of Paul. The college game is just way to fast for him, both mentally and physically.
 
4700 , there were plenty grad transfers available 3 weeks ago. Go talk to your recruitable high school friends after you stop by the bar to talk to j new.

Ha I wonder if he talks to grad transfers too to get their pulse on things. VT4700 will be on Dateline's To Catch a Predator someday.
 
If we did sign someone, I think it is safe to say nearly all of you would be on here in the fall chewing out Mooney for wasting scholarships and ruining any chance we had to sign 2020 guys.

A grad transfer does not waste any chance at 2020 guys. This is an easy concept.

If we had a 50/50 chance to get a contributor to team would you take a grad transfer? Meaning 50% chance he rides bench and gives us nothing, 50% chance he adds something. I think you take those odds all day long. Now I'm an easy grader but I'll give Mooney 50% on prior grads. Bernard didn't get into school but going to count him.

Maybe VT4700 has spoken to Mooney and Hardt and knows the ship isn't available.

Btw if we were 10 deep, had 2 of the top guys in conference, #bestclassever etc. I'd be predicting top 25 let alone NCAA. Yet you won't even commit to NCAA bid. I think I'm the positive one.
 
G, why assume that we are not trying or did not try for a grad transfer? And why assume just any grad transfer would want to come here? It's not like we get to just take our pick and whoever we decide on we get to have. The grad transfer has to see an opportunity here and want to come here also. I don't see a lot of playing time this year if I'm a grad transfer. I guess some of you do. I don't think it's appealing for a grad transfer to spend his final year of school backing up Grant and being the defensive guy. I guess some of you do. I don't think it's a good idea to go to a school where it might be 50/50 that it works out for you when you have your pick of several other options for your final year. I guess some of you do. We can just continue to disagree.
 
Last edited:
Also, keep in mind you don't want to start bringing in grad transfers just to bring them in. As many of you have mentioned, we have had a couple that did not work out. Keep signing questionable ones just to sign them and you will get a reputation of having grad transfers that don't work out, and other schools can use that against you.
 
Keep signing questionable ones just to sign them and you will get a reputation of having grad transfers that don't work out, and other schools can use that against you.

Yeah I'm a little more worried they will say something like '2011' or 'hey look the coach's pants are on fire?'
 
Yeah I'm a little more worried they will say something like '2011' or 'hey look the coach's pants are on fire?'

And they should. Why wouldn't they? You should use every advantage you can. Considering so many of you said our coach was on the hot seat the past few years, it's pretty impressive who he was able to get here recently.
 
Here are all possible reasons why we can't get good grad transfers:

1. We aren't trying hard enough.

2. We are trying hard enough but we suck at recruiting

3. We aren't trying hard enough AND we suck at recruiting.

4. We are great at recruiting but no good players want to come to a team that went 25-40 the past two years.

5. We are great at recruiting but Admissions denies all the good grad transfers we would otherwise get.

6. We are about to be such a great team that all the good grad transfers are scared thy won't be able to play for us.

I guess 5 and 6 are legit possibilities, but it doesn't feel like either one is really keeping us from landing good talent.
 
Here are my responses to your Basketball 101 Finals Quiz:
1. Do you not think mid major grad transfers would have "gaps in their games" somewhere?
A: Some will, some won't. What's your point?
2. Obviously, most of the decent ones are going P6.
A: Obviously? Ok, will presume that most all of them will, I already stated that, so what's your point.
3. Why do you think these so called available grad transfers would be such a sure thing for us?
A: I never said they would be, what's your point?
4. And, why single us out?
A: Where did I single us out? I said that it's situational, this would be true for us and any program.
5. If it is so easy, why wouldn't every team in our conference just add grad transfers every year to be part of the rotation?
A: I never said it was easy. If shit was easy, we'd all be skinny millionaires.
6. I'll ask again: Why is our situation so attractive this year that a grad transfer should want to come here?
A: I'll answer again and get free credit on this question twice. I never said we are attractive, I said it was situational. I actually don't think we're that attractive.
7. We have 5 set starters, and 4 other guys that played last year. So, he is supposed to come here because maybe Nick won't be ready?
A: We have 3 set starters, but all returning players. It's a crowded field to be sure. But I suspect there are a variety of players who have something to add to this team, and frankly, I wouldn't be scared at the chance of trying to beat out players 4-10 for playing time on a team that just lost 20 games.
8. Do you really expect a grad transfer to leave his current situation, have one year of basketball left, and go to a team that has 5 clear starters, and could be 10 deep with no clue on how much playing time he would get?
A: Awesome, another repeated question I can get credit for again. I don't think we are the best option but hell, we have absolutely no strong interior defender, there's one case right there where a guy could come here and immediately earn time.
9. And, of course, never mind the fact that we won 13 games last year, and all we heard on here when Khwan left was grad transfers want to play in the dance. Having it both ways again?
A: I'm not having anything both ways, I said that one of the reasons a guy would come here is if he thought the team had NCAA chances. You said that we should be top4 and in the hunt. I actually think that's ridiculous, but aren't you the one who's having it both ways? If we project that well, wouldn't a guy who wants to dance want to come here and push us over the top?
10. I thought most of you had a negative feel for how we would do this year. So, I guess some of you are suddenly assuming we will go dancing this year and a grad transfer should want to be a part of that?
A: Yet another repeat question. See answer to Q9.

Best quiz ever.
Well done!
 
thinking more about it, I think our best shot at a good grad transfer would be at the SF spot.

a guy coming in there is competing against Nick coming off injury, Tyler who's a freshman, and Jake and Andre who aren't even SFs. he'd have a legitimate chance to start or be in a big role.

I don't think a grad has any chance to start at another position. if he's good enough to start at the other positions, then he's got plenty of big options.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT