We have zero depth with this team. Our bench gets outscored by St.Josephs bench. Come on this is embarrassing
A pretty good prediction, final was 79-56.Honestly. We win this game 78 - 56. We will be pissed and respond accordingly. The prove 'em wrong mentality will step up. Player driven, not coach driven, of course.
I’ll take 5 Burton’s and any other coach and give you pointsGive me 5 Burtons and even Mooney would make it to the dance.
I think he is interviewing for the Fordham job.it's difficult to check the message boards and coach D1 basketball at the same time 🤫
Hogwash. There are no UR grads with 80+ year old moms coaching D1.it's difficult to check the message boards and coach D1 basketball at the same time 🤫
They only scored 31 in the 1st half. I think we would take that every game against any team. If a team scored 31 a half and ended with 62 and we lost? That would be on the offense big time, not the defense.We’re shooting 73% from 3 at the half and only up by 9 against the worst team in the conference. That’s how bad our defense is
I have never coached D1 basketball.it's difficult to check the message boards and coach D1 basketball at the same time 🤫
I'll take 5 Blakes and the points? Great games from both tonight.I’ll take 5 Burton’s and any other coach and give you points
Then why were we only up by 9 when shooting 73% from 3? Not trying to argue, just an honest question about what you think led to that relatively small lead considering the astronomical 3pt%They only scored 31 in the 1st half. I think we would take that every game against any team. If a team scored 31 a half and ended with 62 and we lost? That would be on the offense big time, not the defense.
Obviously you wouldn't, but I would take a 40-31 halftime lead every game, against any team anywhere. But, if you really want to know why we were "only" up 9, you think going an uncharacteristic 7 out of 20 from 2 maybe had anything to do with it? Don't you think we will win a lot, if not maybe even all, of our games if we hold teams to 31 point halves (62 per game)?Then why were we only up by 9 when shooting 73% from 3? Not trying to argue, just an honest question about what you think led to that relatively small lead considering the astronomical 3pt%
If Burton stays all 4 (or 5!) years and continues to improve, he will leave Richmond as the most complete player we've ever seen.
Greg Stevenson(6-6,220) who played at UR ‘99-‘00 and ‘00-‘01 after transferring from Penn State was the equivalent of Tyler’s completeness as a player.
Greg Stevenson College Stats | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Greg Stevenson - Stats, Game Logs, Splits, and much morewww.sports-reference.com
They were missing their top two scorers last night. Our best defense is to keep their scorers on the bench? I guess we should hire Shane Stant to coach defense.Obviously you wouldn't, but I would take a 40-31 halftime lead every game, against any team anywhere. But, if you really want to know why we were "only" up 9, you think going an uncharacteristic 7 out of 20 from 2 maybe had anything to do with it? Don't you think we will win a lot, if not maybe even all, of our games if we hold teams to 31 point halves (62 per game)?
I have never coached D1 basketball.
Whenever Gaitley makes it into a game I am happy - like his attitude! Who says we are not deep - 13 players for Richmond listed in the box score.
Are you really complaining that a walk-on doesn't see more floor time?Putting in subs the last 2 minutes. Really doesn't help players. Gaitley never even sees the floor unless a blowout happens. Even when that happens he plays the most for maybe 2 minutes. It frustrates me so much with Mooney. A guy has been here for 4 years and barely gets a chance to play.
Mooney said on postgame that Andre isn't having any issues. He just forgot to put him in until late in the first half.
How pissed would you be if you are the Top reserve on our team and Mooney forgot about you for nearly an entire half? Jesus, he has been doing this job for what 18 years now.Mooney said on postgame that Andre isn't having any issues. He just forgot to put him in until late in the first half.
Greg Stevenson(6-6,220) who played at UR ‘99-‘00 and ‘00-‘01 after transferring from Penn State was the equivalent of Tyler’s completeness as a player.
Greg Stevenson College Stats | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Greg Stevenson - Stats, Game Logs, Splits, and much morewww.sports-reference.com
Grace and Sal got 13 and 11 minutes and are playing well. Andre does not look 100% yet. Wilson does not look ready, but he still got 6 minutes. I think the bench played plenty last night and did fine overall. No matter who is on our bench, why would you want the guys you mentioned above playing any less minutes?We won by 23 and Gilyard still got 37 minutes, and Francis and Burton 34 and 33 - that should tell you right there - we have no confidence in the bench.
Little concerned Gustav only got 6 minutes - makes me feel he is not 100% yet. I am fine with him playing limited if he is still injured, but concern is this will be a lingering injury. He is our 6th man and best bench player - so without him, it really is no one.
I think it's pretty obvious Goose is not 100% yet. I can tell he looks a little different out there. And, regarding earlier comments, Mooney didn't say he forgot to put him in. He said he put him in a little late. Meaning, if even true, maybe he was thinking three or four minute mark instead of two minute mark in the first half to test the groin out. No big deal there.he put Isaiah in before Goose., which was odd.
That's not what he said. He didn't say no issues. He said no to the question of did he tweak anything against LaSalle. He also said his minutes should be back to normal next game. Which is huge. That tells me he was testing the groin a little bit more last night, maybe not going all out, and felt fine, so overall he might be ready to go 100%.Mooney said on postgame that Andre isn't having any issues. He just forgot to put him in until late in the first half.
I was little worried it was a lingering injury but JOC also reported that Goose was under no restrictions. That was per UR. So they've certainly presented it that Goose is healthy and Mooney comments last night backed that up too. Mooney has mismanaged Goose role all year going back to before he missed games.
My guess is play a little bit in the first half in a game we should win, and if all seems fine, test it out with a few more minutes in the second half. It's possible the extra few minutes against LaSalle was because the game was tighter? Not counting Grace subbing for Grant, when Andre's the first other guy off the bench, we will know he's 100%. Let's hope that is Friday.back to Goose, he tested it out for 10 minutes against LaSalle on Saturday and didn't have any issues. it just seem surprising to limit him to 6 minutes last night. maybe CM felt no need to risk it in a fairly comfortable win, but then why risk it for even 6 minutes?