I guess this is my question though, is that how we are doing things? Just filling spots with guys who are unlikely to ever really be competitive for us? Wouldn't we be better off leaving a spot open for next year and instead of recruiting over a guy (which btw, we don't really do) and instead go after someone for 2017 who we give a crap about?
No, we'll just sign some random dude, put out a press release about how excited we are to have him, then send him packing next year after we have 12 months to start recruiting his replacement.