ADVERTISEMENT

Why not FBS

I-M-UR

Graduate Assistant
Mar 10, 2006
5,683
2,230
113
I’m sure you’ve noticed I’m adamant about keeping Rocco, vs going to another CAA school. I think it is a complete failure of the administration for a lot of reasons. But that aside;

Why did Rocco pursue or get pursued by a mid level FBS school? It just seem odd. Maybe it happened and we don’t know about it. Maybe Rocco realizes mid level FBS is a very difficult path to move up at his age? Maybe he likes the stability of a upper level FCS situation. If that’s the case we really screwed up. The CAA has had a number of long term head coaches, Raymond, Talley, Laycock, McDonnel?
 
I assume you meant to ask why "didn't" he get pursued by a mid-level FBS school? If so, you will be glad to know that he is interviewing with Temple today.

 
I assume you meant to ask why "didn't" he get pursued by a mid-level FBS school? If so, you will be glad to know that he is interviewing with Temple today.

No just surprised more midlevel FBS teams didn't come aggressively after him. I've heard the Temple rumor for a days. I'm not happy about it but if it happens it happens; of course that was before I read the Not1 post. If that's true it's time to get the pitchfolks out.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT