SLU is just an opportunity. Stanford is an "incredible" opportunity. But wait, VCU was an opportunity, but Mason was a "great" opportunity.
I'm just waiting for him to be 101% (or 1001%) committed somewhere and then change his mind.SLU is just an opportunity. Stanford is an "incredible" opportunity. But wait, VCU was an opportunity, but Mason was a "great" opportunity.
We are not an opportunity at all.
So, what you are saying is you could never be a coach. Coaches at every school get no after no. It's called recruiting.I think it goes without saying, but we really need this to happen. I know if I was on the coaching staff and kept getting no after no, I would begin feeling a bit defeated. This would be a big get for the program but would finally give us something to feel positive about.
King?I really like this type of recruit. guard skills with handle and shooting, but size to possibly defend a big forward. land Noah and I'm on board with a 4 gurd line-up ... if we choose to call him and Tanner guards.
assuming we're done this year, we have 5 spots to fill next class and a huge frontcourt need. we have to replace Quinn, Bigelow and Harris. the only size on the roster would be Walz, Noyes and Tanner.
without definitively hearing he's our #1 priority recruit ... he sure feels like our #1 priority recruit.appears a lot want him, but none more than we do.
on paper just looking for the historically strongest program you might not.This has been on my mind for a while and this kid is a prime example of it. If you have offers from half the A10 including the entire historical upper tier of the conference what would convince one to choose poor little ol' Richmond?
Nothing new there!I'm more worried about the Cal and Stanford offers than the A10.
small town guy may want a small schoolThis has been on my mind for a while and this kid is a prime example of it. If you have offers from half the A10 including the entire historical upper tier of the conference what would convince one to choose poor little ol' Richmond?