Hey, we could use some character issues in our program, especially if they are 6'11"!
No she!t.Hey, we could use some character issues in our program, especially if they are 6'11"!
Certainly didn't stop the Rams.Three schools didn't stop us from going after Bamisile.
Anyway, have to think these super late portal entry guys already have big NIL deals lined up somewhere. Mulcahy from Rutgers was another big one today.
Noyes will get abused playing the 4 by many teams. He just is too slight of stature to defend against bigger stronger players who play that position.so 2 spots left.
thought we were done at guard but I like the Tyne commitment.
now I'm confident (?) we're done at guard. a least we should be.
I'd like a big who can compete for time with Walz behind Quinn.
I think with all the guard pickups that Mooney still sees Roche as a forward.
I think pending another forward addition, Roche is competing with Bailey, Noyes and Tanner at SF. and I assume Roche goes into the summer leading in that battle.
right now Noyes can play SF but he's also the primary (only) backup to Bigelow at big forward.
Maybe a few guys here and there, but there are not very many big time "4s" in the A-10 and it's not like a bunch of teams post up their so called 4s down low anyway. And, I could see a bigger, stronger "4" having a hard time staying with Noyes, especially from 3, as well.Noyes will get abused playing the 4 by many teams. He just is too slight of stature to defend against bigger stronger players who play that position.
he didn't look that thin to me. he was only 10 lbs lighter than Bigelow last season. he can carry more weight.Noyes will get abused playing the 4 by many teams. He just is too slight of stature to defend against bigger stronger players who play that position.
When calling Roche a forward, I think it just means not a ball handler.so 2 spots left.
thought we were done at guard but I like the Tyne commitment.
now I'm confident (?) we're done at guard. a least we should be.
I'd like a big who can compete for time with Walz behind Quinn.
I think with all the guard pickups that Mooney still sees Roche as a forward.
I think pending another forward addition, Roche is competing with Bailey, Noyes and Tanner at SF. and I assume Roche goes into the summer leading in that battle.
right now Noyes can play SF but he's also the primary (only) backup to Bigelow at big forward.
agreed ... and Mooney seemingly will always want 2 ball handlers on the floor.When calling Roche a forward, I think it just means not a ball handler.
Playing the 3, always seemed like a better fit for Roche. He doesn't have the lateral quickness or ball handling ability to play guard. Yes, like I said about Noyes, he will be an athletic disadvantage against some 3 we play, but still think given the make-up of our roster, he will be a "forward" this year for us.When calling Roche a forward, I think it just means not a ball handler.
ALL IS WELL, of course!Maybe a few guys here and there, but there are not very many big time "4s" in the A-10 and it's not like a bunch of teams post up their so called 4s down low anyway. And, I could see a bigger, stronger "4" having a hard time staying with Noyes, especially from 3, as well.
Last season we had 7 of 13 scholarships at 6’6” or taller. So far this year we have 4. I really think we need 1 more, preferably 2.so 2 spots left.
thought we were done at guard but I like the Tyne commitment.
now I'm confident (?) we're done at guard. a least we should be.
I'd like a big who can compete for time with Walz behind Quinn.
I think with all the guard pickups that Mooney still sees Roche as a forward.
I think pending another forward addition, Roche is competing with Bailey, Noyes and Tanner at SF. and I assume Roche goes into the summer leading in that battle.
right now Noyes can play SF but he's also the primary (only) backup to Bigelow at big forward.
We have 5. Quinn, Walz, Bigs, Noyes, and Tanner. With 2 spots left, and some young guards already on board with multiple years left, I agree it would be good to use one on some size, but I could see Roche or Tanner getting some good time with 2 guards out there, so with Quinn and Walz at the "big" spot, that leaves Bigs and Noyes at the last spot. So, while it looks like the roster could maybe use more size, I do think there are still some solid looking lineup possibilities without it.Last season we had 7 of 13 scholarships at 6’6” or taller. So far this year we have 4. I really think we need 1 more, preferably 2.
I think I have still been counting Tanner at 6’5”. (But then again, how was Cayo from recruitment to first game?) I am not saying we need a direct replacement for Grace, just I would be looking for someone that could back up Bigs if I was on the staff.We have 5. Quinn, Walz, Bigs, Noyes, and Tanner. With 2 spots left, and some young guards already on board with multiple years left, I agree it would be good to use one on some size, but I could see Roche or Tanner getting some good time with 2 guards out there, so with Quinn and Walz at the "big" spot, that leaves Bigs and Noyes at the last spot. So, while it looks like the roster could maybe use more size, I do think there are still some solid looking lineup possibilities without it.
I hear you, and my guess is we probably are.I think I have still been counting Tanner at 6’5”. (But then again, how was Cayo from recruitment to first game?) I am not saying we need a direct replacement for Grace, just I would be looking for someone that could back up Bigs if it was on the staff.
We will be out rebounded by 15+ a game this year. Without Tyler, opponents will be dumping the ball in the zone and going after for shot after shot.Last season we had 7 of 13 scholarships at 6’6” or taller. So far this year we have 4. I really think we need 1 more, preferably 2.
That's a lot, even for us. But yes, the strategy against us always has been to crash the glass on both ends because we don't even try to go after it offensively and never have been great at it defensively. Losing our probably best rebounder ever in the Mooney era, I would expect us to once again be really low on the rebounding rankings next year.We will be out rebounded by 15+ a game this year. Without Tyler, opponents will be dumping the ball in the zone and going after for shot after shot.
"Hopefully Bigelow has a strong back. I know his dad sees him as a point guard"Yes, rebounding is a big concern. Hopefully Bigelow has a strong back. I know his dad sees him as a point guard - and he does have some good PG skills, but think Dji and Noyes are going to need to provide some rebounding from the wing.
While everyone has their opinion on the direction of our program in regards to Coach M., negative comments lombasting coach and/or the program has really hurt us dramatically. I am not pointing fingers, we will get past this! One Richmond!!
So what are you saying?it's the fans fault of course! Certainly not the guy that has been running the show for two decades and is coated in 200 layers of teflon
Just curious - can you provide tangible examples of your premise? Facts?While everyone has their opinion on the direction of our program in regards to Coach M., negative comments lombasting coach and/or the program has really hurt us dramatically. I am not pointing fingers, we will get past this! One Richmond!!
I was thinking the same thing. Makes you wonder what he is looking for, doesn't it? And, will he be happy and committed where he ends up? His Dad put something out about a week ago about being disappointed in people he trusted. I don't know what to think about him. Talent wise, I want him, but it just seems strange to visit a few schools a few months ago, and then no decision and not much else since.BTW, the Demarr Langford watch is at 81 days and counting. I wake up every day checking to see the updates.
that pretty interesting considering Tubby stepped down 2 years ago, they gave the HC job to his son, GG Smith, and then they fired GG this March after one season.Dee Barnes to High Point. Did not realize it, but apparently he's Tubby's nephew.
guess the family isn't holding any grudges.Yeah, that was an awfully quick departure for GG. I guess he was just a stopgap since Tubby stepped down midseason, but I wonder why they gave him another full season without also giving him a bit more time. Unless there were extenuating circumstances, but I never saw anything suggesting that.
We have finished…4 FR and 3 transfersit's ok to multi-task and all, but seeing all these 2024 offers and now 2025 offers ...
can we please finish the 2023-24 roster?
I mean, no hurry. it's only the middle of June.
Who is the third transfer? I know of King and Hunt but don't recall a third.We have finished…4 FR and 3 transfers
Yeah, same memory lapse here…Who is the third transfer? I know of King and Hunt but don't recall a third.