Absolutely!!Another solid game by Goose, though easy to overlook with Tyler's stellar night. Goose had 34 minutes, 9 points, 4-4 FTS, 3 steals and usual good D. Yeah 1-5 from deep but some good open looks.
Absolutely!!Another solid game by Goose, though easy to overlook with Tyler's stellar night. Goose had 34 minutes, 9 points, 4-4 FTS, 3 steals and usual good D. Yeah 1-5 from deep but some good open looks.
Who were they scouting? Because I learned here that it can't possibly be Tyler.Also, clippers scout and whoever he was texting agreed Tyler’s goaltend was a good block and not a goaltend.
Great game for Tyler to go off! IMHO, he was dominant in all aspects tonight.
Schuyler Burton..Tyler's brotherWho were they scouting? Because I learned here that it can't possibly be Tyler.
Tyler, Lofton, and number 21 from the Bonnie’s.Who were they scouting? Because I learned here that it can't possibly be Tyler.
“…also #1 Welch on Bona is a punk. He got in a few players faces tonight and our bench let him have it after that Tyler 3. Suck on that L tough guy…”We didn’t shoot well against a good team and won. “But Burton had 36”. Fine, and it looks like he could do that more. He figured out how to finish around the basket tonight. Great win.
also #1 Welch on Bona is a punk. He got in a few players faces tonight and our bench let him have it after that Tyler 3. Suck on that L tough guy
Actually it wasn't. We need more than 2 people scoring in double figures. If the other team shuts down Tyler, we lose.I think that was our most complete game of the season. More of these please!
Yes. I think this was our first complete 40 minute performance all year, sucks that it took 23 games to play one of those. This team clearly has loads of talent, if they can pull it all together like they did Friday, we might go on a nice run here. I am reserving judgment on that based on any previous expectations not being met by this team, but lets hope we got a run in us here.I think that was our most complete game of the season. More of these please!
Agree.Yes. I think this was our first complete 40 minute performance all year, sucks that it took 23 games to play one of those. This team clearly has loads of talent, if they can pull it all together like they did Friday, we might go on a nice run here. I am reserving judgment on that based on any previous expectations not being met by this team, but lets hope we got a run in us here.
Two things, I know, Tyler is out of his funk and that is a really good sign. Goose in the starting line-up is an upgrade. Gilly offense remains frustratingly inconsistent though.
Excellent point on the 50-50 game and this being the first time we won one of those. Pretty much every other W on our schedule is a team that we are simply better than. So, this makes us 2-7 (Bonnie and Toledo) against teams with good talent and profile, with a bad loss to St. Joes thrown in there as well.Agree.
Great game & win. In my opinion also the first 50 50 game we won this season, and it took until February. Maybe one exception is Toledo, but that's debatable. All the rest we loss startin with OOC Utah St & on & on. Throw conference games of Davidson & VCU into that mix. That is why our only path is A10 tourney champions.
This season lined up perfectly with skills and schedule, but we didn't take advantage.
That's coaching!So, this makes us 2-7 (Bonnie and Toledo) against teams with good talent and profile, with a bad loss to St. Joes thrown in there as well.
what exactly made that our first complete 40 minute performance ... besides Tyler playing like he did?Yes. I think this was our first complete 40 minute performance all year ....
Actually it wasn't. We need more than 2 people scoring in double figures. If the other team shuts down Tyler, we lose.
I honestly think if we benched Tyler (or he took less shots in favor of cayo or GG) in the vcu or Davison’s games we probably would’ve won either or both of them. Thus I think it’s hard to make your last point about us sucking with him shooting 1-12.what exactly made that our first complete 40 minute performance ... besides Tyler playing like he did?
if Tyler had a more normal game, we're in a dogfight and we probably lose.
Tyler's play really skews our perception of our entire team. he's scores 36 and our team is great. he shoots 1-12 and our whole team sucks.
Very true. I did think our momentum-intensity was solid the entire 40 minutes. We didn't come out flat and didn't go through a huge lull at any point during the game was my observation. Bonnie has a couple little runs but felt we were in control the entire game.what exactly made that our first complete 40 minute performance ... besides Tyler playing like he did?
if Tyler had a more normal game, we're in a dogfight and we probably lose.
Tyler's play really skews our perception of our entire team. he's scores 36 and our team is great. he shoots 1-12 and our whole team sucks.
Correct. Tyler should have been benched during the VCU game in my opinion. Pretty clear is just wasn't clicking for him. I thought there were times during the Bonnie game where Gilly should have also seen some time on the pine, because his play was similarly poor. As we know with Mooney, though, he is extremely reluctant to pull Gilly, Grant, Tyler if one of them is struggling, despite the fact that we have a solid bench that might be able to spark us. Sometimes, a little time off the court, when your struggling can also help that player reset as well. Playing through it isn't always the answer, although it is for Mooney.I honestly think if we benched Tyler (or he took less shots in favor of cayo or GG) in the vcu or Davison’s games we probably would’ve won either or both of them. Thus I think it’s hard to make your last point about us sucking with him shooting 1-12.
Also think is sends a bad message to the bench players, who can and do get very limited time if they come in and don't play well, but if one of the Big 3, has a longer bad stretch, they don't get the same treatment.Correct. Tyler should have been benched during the VCU game in my opinion. Pretty clear is just wasn't clicking for him. I thought there were times during the Bonnie game where Gilly should have also seen some time on the pine, because his play was similarly poor. As we know with Mooney, though, he is extremely reluctant to pull Gilly, Grant, Tyler if one of them is struggling, despite the fact that we have a solid bench that might be able to spark us. Sometimes, a little time off the court, when your struggling can also help that player reset as well. Playing through it isn't always the answer, although it is for Mooney.
Correct. Tyler should have been benched during the VCU game in my opinion. Pretty clear is just wasn't clicking for him. I thought there were times during the Bonnie game where Gilly should have also seen some time on the pine, because his play was similarly poor. As we know with Mooney, though, he is extremely reluctant to pull Gilly, Grant, Tyler if one of them is struggling, despite the fact that we have a solid bench that might be able to spark us. Sometimes, a little time off the court, when your struggling can also help that player reset as well. Playing through it isn't always the answer, although it is for Mooney.
no, we had to bench Nick for missing a couple shots in a row also. we're down to Kulju.We had no Connor or Dji for VCU, and I learned here that Marcus is a "waste of space" for having committed a turnover. So what is your hindsight 20/20 substitution plan? Sherod to cover Vince Williams?
When I say bench someone, I don't mean take them out and never put them back in. I mean, you take a guy out who is struggling and insert one of our bench players for a period of time for a spark. I think that is better sometimes than just keep playing a guy who is completely in his head (which Tyler was against VCU). As for who covered, Williams, I believe he scored 22 points on us, so I would say whomever was guarding him, didn't do an overly spectacular job.We had no Connor or Dji for VCU, and I learned here that Marcus is a "waste of space" for having committed a turnover. So what is your hindsight 20/20 substitution plan? Sherod to cover Vince Williams?
We had no Connor or Dji for VCU, and I learned here that Marcus is a "waste of space" for having committed a turnover. So what is your hindsight 20/20 substitution plan? Sherod to cover Vince Williams?
Nick is benched because he can't guard anyone and if he isn't making shots for us, he just can't be in the game. Which some of us said before the season started only to be drowned out by a chorus of folks (including the coaching staff) that his shooting would offset his defense. Because Sherod covering Vince Williams was the plan at the start of the season, but yeah, that seem pretty laughable now.no, we had to bench Nick for missing a couple shots in a row also. we're down to Kulju.
This has been the way Mooney has operated for 17 years & will be the next 17. Regardless of how good or bad play on the court is, Mooney has always had core players he's reluctant to pull. On the other hand, subs have historically been yanked if they make mistakes in limited play.Also think is sends a bad message to the bench players, who can and do get very limited time if they come in and don't play well, but if one of the Big 3, has a longer bad stretch, they don't get the same treatment.
Impose a one-week self-ban from this board and slink away in shame...Did I say "in defense of Mooney"? Wow - take it in while it lasts.
100%. If Burton wasn't as good as he was, Spiders lose this game against Bonnies.what exactly made that our first complete 40 minute performance ... besides Tyler playing like he did?
if Tyler had a more normal game, we're in a dogfight and we probably lose.
Tyler's play really skews our perception of our entire team. he's scores 36 and our team is great. he shoots 1-12 and our whole team sucks.
And if Tyler didn’t play so poorly against VCU and Davidson, we would’ve won those games. This is my last post on this as I’m a huge Tyler fan as well. I hope he continues to play at this level as we are obviously a lot more dangerous when he’s a primary scorer.100%. If Burton wasn't as good as he was, Spiders lose this game against Bonnies.
Good news, there was no collapse down the stretch
Yes and no. Mooney always his favorites who can do wrong. On this team that is Gilyard. He can stink it up out there at times and their is never a consequence. I do think that is unique among coaches because I think most coaches understand you cannot have different rules for different players.This has been the way Mooney has operated for 17 years & will be the next 17. Regardless of how good or bad play on the court is, Mooney has always had core players he's reluctant to pull. On the other hand, subs have historically been yanked if they make mistakes in limited play.
In defense of Mooney, I'm not sure if other coaches don't react similarly.
Did I say "in defense of Mooney"? Wow - take it in while it lasts.
Wilson, Goose, Crabtree can all handle the PG duties to give Gilly rest, particularly when Gilly is struggling. They all already act as PG when Gilly is in the game at times anyway.Actually both good points, Gilly can get a rest to get his footing sometimes, But he cannot really as as sman points out, there is not really a competent 2nd option. That is recruiting and roster management. Not advocating for burning Nelson's shirt, but probably should have had someone in place before Gilly's 5th year. I think Wilson can be strong defender for us, but a Brickus type with more offensive game would have been nice.
I think he's got a good shot but doesn't appear looking to shoot. Earlier in the season he did. I think next year he probably gets decent points per game.Crabtree has become the invisible man. I think he can give us good minutes, but it doesn't appear the coaching staff agrees.