ADVERTISEMENT

Spider Collective

How about that, there's even a website. Led by a Chris Schoemann who has headed up a bunch of them around the country.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Spiders4ever
How about that, there's even a website. Led by a Chris Schoemann who has headed up a bunch of them around the country.

Is the Spider Collective for the basketball team only? or all Spiders athletes? There was an opportunity to support a specific athlete option...

over on the football forum there was something called the NIL Club that was discussed back in mid summer...it appears to still be active

I guess we have competing NIL's? I'm still confused!o_O
 
Serious question. Do you think there will ever be a salary cap on the amount of money an athlete can get yearly from NIL contributions?
 
PQ announced it on the alumni FB group earlier today. For just $25k you can travel with the team and have lunch with Mooney and your favorite player.

Link for those in the group
 
season 8 GIF
 
Well football season is over, let’s buy a basketball team!!!!
 
Serious question. Do you think there will ever be a salary cap on the amount of money an athlete can get yearly from NIL contributions?
no, because that would defeat the whole purpose.
watch the Manziel doc on Netflix and tell me what his cap should have been.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: spiders13
By my count, that's all of the scholarship guys except Bigelow and Tyne who have publicly announced.

 
Manziel would have spent it all on booze, gambling, women; not exactly the poster child for why you should give 18 years old unfettered access to large sums of money.
he helped a school increase revenue by hundreds of millions of dollars.
doesn't matter what he would do with it. if someone is willing to pay, there shouldn't be a cap. he was an adult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: plydogg
he helped a school increase revenue by hundreds of millions of dollars.
doesn't matter what he would do with it. if someone is willing to pay, there shouldn't be a cap. he was an adult.
Just because someone is 18 and a legal adult, doesn't mean they are equipped to handle all of that, in fact most aren't. College used to be for developing maturity/life skills so that later in life you could. Giving unfettered money to young people just because someone else is also making money doesn't make it right or best for these kids and certainly is hurting the brand and the game in many other ways. I just see it as a lose-lose for all parties in involved. But I understand we live in a capitalistic society, where everything is monetized, and this the way of the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wr70beh
he helped a school increase revenue by hundreds of millions of dollars.
doesn't matter what he would do with it. if someone is willing to pay, there shouldn't be a cap. he was an adult.
TAMU sold out every game before he got there, and continued to sell out after he left. Did their athletic department revenue increase by $200 or $300 millIon? I think you are vastly overestimating his economic impact.

TAMU earned about $145 million in athletic revenue in its most recent fiscal year. It was not earning $200+ million in the JM era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wr70beh
TAMU sold out every game before he got there, and continued to sell out after he left. Did their athletic department revenue increase by $200 or $300 millIon? I think you are vastly overestimating his economic impact.

TAMU earned about $145 million in athletic revenue in its most recent fiscal year. It was not earning $200+ million in the JM era.
did you watch the show? donations alone increased $350 million. and they sold a ridiculous number of #2 jersey's (can't remember how many). plus all the publicity and bowl money, etc. he had a tremendous financial impact.
 
but do you? lol.
you're argument for not allowing him to be paid what the market determines is his worth ... is that it's for his own good???
I do, which is why I said that, I understand.

My argument is that college athletics have forever been amateur and if you want to go play professionally and get paid to do so, than nothing is preventing that. But if you want to go to college, play sports and get a college degree than that is what a college scholarship does for you. But now we blended the two, where a very small percentage of college student can both go to college and get paid for playing, while a vast majority of college athletes will get nothing or a pittance despite putting forth similar efforts for their endavours. For every Johnny Manziel, there are probably a thousand D-1 athletes, playing olympic sports getting nothing.
 
For every Johnny Manziel, there are probably a thousand D-1 athletes, playing olympic sports getting nothing.
in my opinion, they should all get what the market determines they should get. which for most who are not impact players or who are playing in non-revenue producing sports is zero. those who make an impact are are worth a lot more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gospidersgo
College sports in general (and college basketball in particular) have always been my favorite sports to root for. So selfishly, I've hated seeing the turn away amateur sports.

But if this is the way it's going to be - if players are going to be allowed to make money, I agree with you spiderman that it should not be capped. I don't want some NCAA upper brass deciding how much money 100's of thousands of students are equipped to handle.
 
College sports in general (and college basketball in particular) have always been my favorite sports to root for. So selfishly, I've hated seeing the turn away amateur sports.

But if this is the way it's going to be - if players are going to be allowed to make money, I agree with you spiderman that it should not be capped. I don't want some NCAA upper brass deciding how much money 100's of thousands of students are equipped to handle.
Agreed fair market value is the way the world works, rightly or wrongly and no reason for UR with in general an alumni group that has done well to follow the trend.
 
I think personally were asking the wrong questions in this entire matter. Why is the NFL, a multi billion dollar entity, have a developmental league entirely subsidized by educational institutions? There needs to be a minor league for all those sports, if they want to go pro, they should not be stopped from it. The NBA kind of fixed it with the g league.

Furthermore, if the NFL did have a minor league system, would that generate as much interest as college football games? Take a look at the G League for an answer. So many of the players benefit from the branding of the school, from free scholarships to charter flights and paid tutors, things only regular college students (who pay for the activity fees in may of these instances) could dream of. The majority of these schools at the D1 level lose money on college athletics already, but now in order to keep up, many of those same schools are going to have to spend more just to not lose more. Its a never ending rat race I do not find particularly enjoyable.

Student athletes and schools both benefited from this system, in which it allowed for many kids who would never dream of collecting a paycheck play sports at a very high level.

I don't have a problem with a player making money off their NIL, the best part of college sports IMO was having players get recruited in HS and getting to know them as they are rising up the high school ranks, then having that player for 4-5 years to develop them. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. The transfer portal absolutely killed roster continuity though and I find my interest in college athletics waning because of it.
 
I don't have a problem with a player making money off their NIL, the best part of college sports IMO was having players get recruited in HS and getting to know them as they are rising up the high school ranks, then having that player for 4-5 years to develop them. Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. The transfer portal absolutely killed roster continuity though and I find my interest in college athletics waning because of it.
I’m all for athletes being compensated for their name, image, and likeness when those things are used as marketing tools. However, this whole “collective” creation is terrible and just further erodes the collegiate concept of a “student athlete”. We are back to the mercenary model, which is how football started in the Ivy Leagues. I am not interested in seeing how much money can be given to an athlete to play on “my favorite college team” for a given year in a couple select sports. It is worse than the pros, where there are actual multi-year contracts. What I want to see is the team building exercise and student athletes who have an investment in their school and their sport. Will I be able to see such a team in D1 hoops? Unfortunately, it will be harder and harder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GKiller
so much NIL doom and gloom here.
we lost one guy to a high payimg NIL ... AFTER HE GRADUATED!
Has nothing to do with Tyler for me. The whole pay to play, transfer at will, conference realignment for football has really taken the amateur nature out of college sports. Everyone is just chasing dollars and no one gives a damn how it impacts college kids, nor the average fan of college sports, as long as select few at the top are raking in tons of dough in the name of "progress".
 
Has nothing to do with Tyler for me. The whole pay to play, transfer at will, conference realignment for football has really taken the amateur nature out of college sports. Everyone is just chasing dollars and no one gives a damn how it impacts college kids, nor the average fan of college sports, as long as select few at the top are raking in tons of dough in the name of "progress".
Exactly what I was saying but in a different way. Also, I am not taking about immediate impact (of which there has been little for UR other than Tyler) but of what the future will bring. None of this is making the “product” better and the whole solution was not executed well.
 
I have not looked at many other NIL websites but is this how must of them are run? Just seems very high level and bland and just donate money and we will make sure it get to kids - is that it? No levels or tiers for donating? No outline on what exactly the collective will ask of student-athletes? What sports? etc. Just seems very basic at this point in time or rushed - and not sure if that is normal for other collectives or are they more robust?
 
Here's some from in the conference

 
It does seem to only be for men's hoops at the moment, but yeah, it's not at all clear. Maybe it will expand in the future, but so far the only people saying they've gotten anything from it are men's hoops players.

Our website is just from a template this guy's firm uses to run ones for a bunch of schools. So yes, very bland and generic. See ones for UMass, Providence, Southern Illinois, Arizona State, San Jose State, St. Mary's, Evansville, etc...they're all the same template.







 
It does seem to only be for men's hoops at the moment, but yeah, it's not at all clear. Maybe it will expand in the future, but so far the only people saying they've gotten anything from it are men's hoops players.

Our website is just from a template this guy's firm uses to run ones for a bunch of schools. So yes, very bland and generic. See ones for UMass, Providence, Southern Illinois, Arizona State, San Jose State, St. Mary's, Evansville, etc...they're all the same template.







Someone came up from with a great business model. I would expect that as these NILs get better organized they will tire of paying the fees associated with and take this in house, particularly larger schools. But hey for now, yeah just use the already established template and pay these guys a percentage to run your NIL.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT