Ya, I would agree that the difference between 17-18 year olds and 22-23 year olds now is big enough that the physicality, strength, and experience of the older players can make up a talent difference against most young players. Especially in a team that is well coached and play well together. Same idea with St. Joe’s who have NBA first rounder in Fleming and other NBA prospects in Reynolds and Brown and yet still finished 6th in the A10. Also with us when we had Golden, Gilly, Sherod, Cayo who were older and more experienced than Kentucky and beat them at Rupp arena.was thinking about this. I've probably never seen a Rutgers game in my life, but was just looking at a mock NBA draft that had Rutgers guys going #2 and #3. and they had other players that have since transferred to U of Washington, Georgetown and Dayton.
how did a team with 2 of the top players in the country and apparently some solid guys around them go 8-12 in the B10 and 15-17 overall?
only guess is that no matter how much talent you have, you have to be old. maybe you can't win when your best 3 players are freshmen, no matter how good they are.