GDT: Mississippi State vs. The Spiders

[Gallipoli]

Can You Review a Foul in Basketball? (2023 Update) | Sports Fan Focus

Throughout a basketball game a referee is bound to make a few foul calls that are wrong. Sometimes these calls have a huge impact on the outcome of the game, which can be very frustrating to a team and its fans. Now that basketball has instant replay available you may be wondering if they can...

sportsfanfocus.com

As mentioned previously in the article, you cannot review whether or not a common foul occurred in men’s college basketball. This means if your team got whistled for a bogus call, unfortunately the mistake will stand. Common fouls are not reviewable.

 

[SouthJerseySpiderFan]

Tough loss but great game from Grace. If he can play like that consistently, let him play 20 minutes.* Smart player like most Spiders. Opposite being MIss St ..... completely confused team that won game on one shot. I wouldn't want Howland's job for anything.

*That being of course no better transfer arrives.

 

[ur2K]

Can you review a missed free throw and re-do it?

Or review how bright the future actually is?

 

[I-M-UR]

I know it was probably not going to change the outcome at the end, but I was not a fan of the use of Gilyard as a decoy on that last inbound. He is our best player on the court. Give him a chance to win it.

I think he was trying to get a charging foul

 

[Gallipoli]

Can you review a missed free throw and re-do it?
Or review how bright the future actually is?

As mentioned previously in the article, you cannot review whether or not a common foul occurred in men’s college basketball. This means if your team got whistled for a bogus call, unfortunately the mistake will stand. Common fouls are not reviewable.

 

[Eight Legger]

We lost the game, but that was a total bullshit call to use video to overturn a foul. I have never seen that at any level of basketball, ever.

 

[Spider B]

We routinely lose the first couple of mins out of half time. It's a trend and cost us tonight. 5-0 MS State to take it from a tied to +5 MS State.

 

[Gallipoli]

We lost the game, but that was a total bullshit call to use video to overturn a foul. I have never seen that at any level of basketball, ever.

It was an illegal call.

 

[ur2K]

As mentioned previously in the article, you cannot review whether or not a common foul occurred in men’s college basketball. This means if your team got whistled for a bogus call, unfortunately the mistake will stand. Common fouls are not reviewable.

what about if you had a chance to ice the game with a free throw at the end and blew it? Can you review that?

 

[urfan1]

Can You Review a Foul in Basketball? (2023 Update) | Sports Fan Focus

Throughout a basketball game a referee is bound to make a few foul calls that are wrong. Sometimes these calls have a huge impact on the outcome of the game, which can be very frustrating to a team and its fans. Now that basketball has instant replay available you may be wondering if they can...

sportsfanfocus.com

As mentioned previously in the article, you cannot review whether or not a common foul occurred in men’s college basketball. This means if your team got whistled for a bogus call, unfortunately the mistake will stand. Common fouls are not reviewable.

Article pretty clear -- bogus review and changed call. Chris seemed to accept the explanation of the Ref, want to hear what he said.

 

[whampas]

God help Richmond basketball. On national display for all to see.

 

[MolivaManiac]

We should file a protest so that the remainder of the NIT is contested under protest.

 

[Gospiders06]

Or we accept the results like Mooney does!!! Don't worry guys see you all at the bank!!!

We should file a protest so that the remainder of the NIT is contested under protest.

 

[SpiderK]

We can all understand P5 schools having better athletes than we do, but missing 9 free throws is just pathetic. Since we abandoned the rebound 16 years ago, we have needed to excel at turnover ratios and free throw percentages to make up for it. We haven’t. Fire Mooney

 

[SpiderAlways]

Make two free throws at the end there and everybody is talking about how gutsy our kids played. Instead

 

[SpiderGuy]

14/23 from the free throw line. Stats like that will lose games. And what do you know.

Thought the same thing. Told my wife that we were going to lose down the stretch 'cause of poor free throw shooting. The guys controlled most of second half and deserved to win.

 

[SpiderK]

We should file a protest so that the remainder of the NIT is contested under protest.

Let’s all gather ‘round the Lee Monument and raise hell. 😂

 

[Eight Legger]

MSU honestly had no businesses even being in that game. They are a shitty FT shooting team and somehow went apeshit from the line until the 7-footer clanged the last two. They really only had two decent players. I can't fathom that we lost.

 

[Gospiders06]

Winning wasn't the plan tonight.

Make two free throws at the end there and everybody is talking about how gutsy our kids played. Instead

 

[SpiderRick]

We should file a protest so that the remainder of the NIT is contested under protest.

Put an asterisk on the banner...

 

[Spiders4ever]

We lost the game, but that was a total bullshit call to use video to overturn a foul. I have never seen that at any level of basketball, ever.

Now you have.

 

[urfan1]

Article pretty clear -- bogus review and changed call. Chris seemed to accept the explanation of the Ref, want to hear what he said.

Chris said Ref told him he had the discretion to increase severity of the call, or remove it, Ref was confident so he must be right.

 

[Spider B]

MSU honestly had no businesses even being in that game. They are a shitty FT shooting team and somehow went apeshit from the line until the 7-footer clanged the last two. They really only had two decent players. I can't fathom that we lost.

Welcome to Mooney ball!!

 

[Eight Legger]

So the ref lied? Got it.

 

[Ram Bal]

I think he was trying to get a charging foul

This is exactly correct. It’s an awesome play but unfortunately the MS player stepped out of the way. Gil yard played it perfectly. The NIT showed Richmond has some terrific weapons for next season. I think Gilyard stays another year. Hang tough Spider fans!

 

[I-M-UR]

This is exactly correct. It’s an awesome play but unfortunately the MS player stepped out of the way. Gil yard played it perfectly. The NIT showed Richmond has some terrific weapons for next season. I think Gilyard stays another year. Hang tough Spider fans!

Hell no.....unless we make a coaching change 8th place finishes are the norm

 

[spider fan]

Only review according to rules is whether or not a foul is flagrant 1 or flagrant 2, it can not be taken away. The ref had the power to call it the way he wanted and it is over. Richmond could protest but will not. Most likely would accomplish nothing.

 

[Gospiders06]

WE GOT MOONEY COMING BACK FOR RAMNATION1 I CAN"T WAIT FOR THE REMATCH!!! OH WAIT, Mooney doesn't know how to beat VCU. Maybe we will get some better luck next year!

This is exactly correct. It’s an awesome play but unfortunately the MS player stepped out of the way. Gil yard played it perfectly. The NIT showed Richmond has some terrific weapons for next season. I think Gilyard stays another year. Hang tough Spider fans!

 

[ChoppinBroccoli]

As mentioned previously in the article, you cannot review whether or not a common foul occurred in men’s college basketball. This means if your team got whistled for a bogus call, unfortunately the mistake will stand. Common fouls are not reviewable.

I blame St. Louis Baseball.

 

[Eight Legger]

Only review according to rules is whether or not a foul is flagrant 1 or flagrant 2, it can not be taken away. The ref had the power to call it the way he wanted and it is over. Richmond could protest but will not. Most likely would accomplish nothing.

Hopefully the ref is fired and never works an NCAA game again. You can't make up the rules as you go along. His career should end.

 

[ChoppinBroccoli]

Wow, the wheel of excuses has a strong gravitational pull.

 

[MrTbone]

Wow, the wheel of excuses has a strong gravitational pull.

Yes, although you have to admit that we continue to find unique and innovative ways to lose.

 

[SouthJerseySpiderFan]

Only review according to rules is whether or not a foul is flagrant 1 or flagrant 2, it can not be taken away. The ref had the power to call it the way he wanted and it is over. Richmond could protest but will not. Most likely would accomplish nothing.

From the NCAA official rule book .....

d. Fouls. 1. After a call has been made, determine if a flagrant personal foul or a flagrant 2 contact technical foul or a contact dead ball technical foul occurred. When it is determined that a flagrant personal or flagrant 2 contact technical foul did not occur, but a contact dead ball technical foul or common foul did occur, those fouls shall be penalized accordingly. However, no other infractions may be penalized. When the review discloses, by indisputable evidence, that there was no foul, the foul call shall be reversed with no foul charged.

Appears refs had it right. They were looking at Ado's foul as possibly flagrant. Last sentence tells the story and the refs correct decision. I just hope Mooney wasn't the one who asked for the review? LOL! No review, no call change.

 

[SpiderK]

Wow, the wheel of excuses has a strong gravitational pull.

Did Confucius say that? 😊

 

[SouthJerseySpiderFan]

As mentioned previously in the article, you cannot review whether or not a common foul occurred in men’s college basketball. This means if your team got whistled for a bogus call, unfortunately the mistake will stand. Common fouls are not reviewable.

Your light upstairs appears to be flickering but just change the bulb and your future will be BRIGHT! Without question go the way of articles over the official rule book.

 

[plydogg]

We lost the game, but that was a total bullshit call to use video to overturn a foul. I have never seen that at any level of basketball, ever.

Not sure if anybody has pointed this out, but if that foul hadn’t been overturned then Gustavson would have been shooting 2 and not 1 and 1 at the end. That foul change directly affected the end result of the game

 

[nathanw19]

Not sure if anybody has pointed this out, but if that foul hadn’t been overturned then Gustavson would have been shooting 2 and not 1 and 1 at the end. That foul change directly affected the end result of the game

Looks like it was all correct though.

Because of the review for whether the foul was flagrant, they could overturn the call if they determined it definitely wasn’t a foul.

I agree with them that it definitely wasn’t a foul. The Miss St player was standing still and Goose ran full speed into him. That’s not a foul.

Sucks for us that it was overturned, but in the end, nothing nefarious happened. There shouldn’t have been a whistle in the first place for a foul.

 

[urfan1]

My understanding is if called a flagrant foul you can review as stated, if called a common foul you cannot review. I understood it was called as a common foul. All that said I felt it was not a foul and the result was corrected on review. Question is do they have the authority to correct.

 

[8legs1dream]

well, we have finally been put out of our misery and it is officially the offseason. The guys that are getting collectively paid millions better earn the damn money and eat, sleep, and breathe the transfer portal and get some serious help on the roster because we are going to need it.

 

[nathanw19]

My understanding is if called a flagrant foul you can review as stated, if called a common foul you cannot review. I understood it was called as a common foul. All that said I felt it was not a foul and the result was corrected on review. Question is do they have the authority to correct.

See post 113 from SouthJerseySpiderFan.

He quotes the rule book. Seems pretty clear that during a flagrant review, if there is indisputable evidence there was no foul, it can be reversed.

That fits what happened last night: flagrant review and then indisputable evidence there actually was no foul.

The bummer for us, as SouthJersey points out, is that if there was no flagrant review, they couldn’t have overturned the call...