Man, the NET sure loves the Lambs. Despite a season sweep (that wasn't close), a better record, a better road and neutral court record, and a stronger schedule, the Rhody Rams still find themselves 4 slots below them.
They don't have a bad loss to Richmond.How is Wake Forest nearly 50 spots higher than BC?
They don't have a bad loss to Richmond.
Zing!
Maybe the Brown loss hurts?Man, the NET sure loves the Lambs. Despite a season sweep (that wasn't close), a better record, a better road and neutral court record, and a stronger schedule, the Rhody Rams still find themselves 4 slots below them.
Man, the NET sure loves the Lambs. Despite a season sweep (that wasn't close), a better record, a better road and neutral court record, and a stronger schedule, the Rhody Rams still find themselves 4 slots below them.
BC is back in Quad 4.
7 of our OOC opponents are in Quad 4. More than half.
3 more are in Quad 3.
The new spin is that this was advance planning for 2020-21.& Radford has pretty good chance to fall to quad 4 too. That would be 8/13.
Some ppl on here tried to claim Wake would not be a downgrade from Vandy & that we don’t have issues w our OOC.
& Radford has pretty good chance to fall to quad 4 too. That would be 8/13.
Some ppl on here tried to claim Wake would not be a downgrade from Vandy & that we don’t have issues w our OOC.
The new spin is that this was advance planning for 2020-21.
The new spin is that this was advance planning for 2020-21.
Wisconsin beat Michigan ST, Purdue beat Wisconsin, VCU beat...nevermind...Wiscy knocked off Michigan State. I'm sure that will end up helping VCU instead of us somehow.
It might not take much for a P5 AWAY game to be Quad 2 (135).Wasn’t there a theory posed that the bottomfeeding P5 programs would all end up close to quad2 by virtue of their conference schedules? I guess that hypothesis is mostly blown.
The posers of that theory have quietly moved on. Goalposts moved.Wasn’t there a theory posed that the bottomfeeding P5 programs would all end up close to quad2 by virtue of their conference schedules? I guess that hypothesis is mostly blown.
I think it gets us another few years with CM.Let’s say we end regular season 24-7 including a win over VCU 2/15. Then go 1-1 in New York. Would 25-8 get us anything in March?
Let’s assume Dayton wins the tournament
Wasn’t there a theory posed that the bottomfeeding P5 programs would all end up close to quad2 by virtue of their conference schedules? I guess that hypothesis is mostly blown.
Let’s say we end regular season 24-7 including a win over VCU 2/15. Then go 1-1 in New York. Would 25-8 get us anything in March?
Let’s assume Dayton wins the tournament
So, even a 4-14 SEC finish for Vandy likely puts them top 100 and worst case we are probably looking at a 100-125 game.
Yep. These are 2 great OOC games to play. Both could easily end up top 100 are both are winnable. Both could be tier 2 games if the home opponent is 31-75 and the away 76-135.
No one is saying these are our toughest OOC games, but they could all realistically be top 100 games. They are good opponents for us to play. Winnable games who could end up tier 2 (tier 1 if 1-75 on the road), but are clearly not tier 4.
Why would you say it is optimistic to call them tier 2?
Exactly. Possible tier 2, but no worse than 3.
You don't think 2 of Auburn, Wisconsin or New Mexico, combined with Vandy, Wake, and BC, and adding ODU and Charleston would match up with the toughest schedules in the A-10?
But, at least it is a possible 2, a name P5 team, and a tier 3 team at the worst.
I don't remember anyone saying anything like that, either.But, I like the looks of it so far. 7 real good opponents from a name and hopefully a quadrant standpoint
Let’s say we end regular season 24-7 including a win over VCU 2/15. Then go 1-1 in New York. Would 25-8 get us anything in March?
Let’s assume Dayton wins the tournament
Clearly those posts didn’t age well. It certainly could still have been a decent scheduling gamble but right now the only contribution they provide is a perceptual value of being wins over P5 teams.I credit you for research, but not for reading comprehension. Where in any of that did I say they WOULD end up top 75 quad 2? If Wake is sitting there at 113 today, and looking at last year's rankings of power teams, I think it was fair to say going into the season any power team could smell the top 100. Don't blame me if the NET likes a team like Wake a lot better than BC. All BC did today was win at UNC. Guess they will drop for that as well. Sorry, but I stand by saying those were good opponents, and good wins, and the committee will like a win over BC and any power team a lot better than a win over a 300 something team, regardless of where the NET puts them. And, looking at some of my posts you copied, looks like I didn't even know if they were home or road games, meaning if on the road they only needed to be top 135. Keep trolling me all you want. I won't see your replies anymore. And, sorry for you we won tonight. I know that must irritate you.
Clearly those posts didn’t age well. It certainly could still have been a decent scheduling gamble but right now the only contribution they provide is a perceptual value of being wins over P5 teams.
They don’t look better than a win over UNC Greensboro or a mid pack P5, I think that’s the point folks made preseason.If that is all they would provide, that would still be a lot better than a no name high 200 or 300s team. And, a BC win is looking better and better to the committee, regardless of where they end up NET wise. Who knows? Vandy might still get a nice attention grabbing win or two, which would help as well. If you end up on the bubble, and the bubble team's quad numbers are similar, these wins could still help us.
And, keep in mind if these are home and homes, we go their places next year, which would only make it easier to get them to quad 2 status. And, if you look at my posts a little closer, it looks like I did not know where we were playing them yet, so I definitely stand by saying they could have been quad 2 games then. But, anyone who still wants to drill me for saying that should at least give me a touch of credit for saying Alabama could be quad 1 when plenty of posts said no chance that would happen.
Blind squirrel.If that is all they would provide, that would still be a lot better than a no name high 200 or 300s team. And, a BC win is looking better and better to the committee, regardless of where they end up NET wise. Who knows? Vandy might still get a nice attention grabbing win or two, which would help as well. If you end up on the bubble, and the bubble team's quad numbers are similar, these wins could still help us.
And, keep in mind if these are home and homes, we go their places next year, which would only make it easier to get them to quad 2 status. And, if you look at my posts a little closer, it looks like I did not know where we were playing them yet, so I definitely stand by saying they could have been quad 2 games then. But, anyone who still wants to drill me for saying that should at least give me a touch of credit for saying Alabama could be quad 1 when plenty of posts said no chance that would happen.
I don't remember anyone saying anything like that, either.
We moved up two spots to #56 after yesterday's win and pretty good results by our OOC opponents.