ADVERTISEMENT

Coaching incompetence

Based on this clip from JOC after the game, Mooney's claim is that on two separate occasions, the officials did not let him sub in Dusan after the officials called a time out, something that he claims he had never heard of before and didn't know was a rule. So that means one of the following:

• This is the rule, and no one on our coaching staff, including our 20-year $1.3M-annual-salaried head coach, knew about it.
• This is not the rule, and no one on our coaching staff was able to produce the actual rule or ask the officials to look it up.
• This is not the rule, and Mooney did not raise absolute ungodly hell during and after the officials' failure to let Dusan back into the game, or during the press conference after the game.
• This is or is not the rule, but after the first time it happened, no one on our coaching staff learned a thing, and all of them were equally surprised when it then happened again 10 minutes later.
• Regardless of whether it is or isn't a rule, Mooney assumed that even though we had no timeouts left in overtime, he would somehow be able to sub Dusan back into the game.

All of these are bad. None of these are good. We lost the game because of coaching incompetence.
 
I’ve asked this b4 but what is so hard to understand is why don’t we have increased expectations for a 20 year coach. Isn’t that 1 of the points. Like why don’t we have an advantage on game situations & rules. Or why at 20 years r we looking at 2 of 3 losing seasons. Or still not having a less than embarrassing win rate vs vcu. Etc etc.
 
I think Mooney and Coach Cal should hire you to be their agent.

Dont expect results from my client!! And yes make sure the extra million is in the mail or else we are going to get out schemesd even worse!! It's not the coaches fault!! It's those darn primadonna players that PQ hired fault!!

Gotta at least appreciate the comedy our hoops program provides
 
This might be the relevant rule (3-6.1.h.2)

h. Substitutions shall not be permitted when the game clock has been
stopped after a successful field goal in the last 59.9 seconds of the second
half or of any extra period and before the clock has been properly started
except for the following:


1. Those substitutions permitted by rule, including, but not limited
to, injury, blood, violation, foul, disqualification, timeout, monitor
review for a score, or for a lost, displaced or irritated contact lens or
displaced eyeglasses; or


2. There shall be no substitutions during the dead-ball period when the
clock is stopped for a successful field goal to correct a timing mistake
or for an inadvertent whistle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8legs1dream
How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
No one is excusing the horrid play of the players. But what you are insinuating is that the coach isn’t responsible for the total product.

The coach is responsible for getting the right players, getting them to execute his strategy, and getting the most out of them. He is at a bare minimum on point to make sure his best players are on the floor when he needs them.

We are 328th in the ncaa in 3pt shooting pctg. That’s not a “ they had a bad game” problem, that’s a 17 game and counting problem. CM owns that.
 
And Mooney's constant "answer" is "We need to shoot better." Well no shit, Sherlock. But get a clue: We suck at shooting. We aren't going to shoot better. So maybe stop shooting 30 threes a game, because we're only going to make about six of them, and since you coach your teams to run away from offensive rebounds, we're just handing the other team free possession after free possession.

Literally try ANYTHING else. Run-and-gun. Forty minutes of hell. Four corners offense. Three centers and two forwards. LITERALLY ANYTHING ELSE.

This is mind-numbing insanity.
 
It's funny, when he subbed him out in the first place... I didn't understand it. The focus on this 'rule' is mere deflection... and I'm furious about it.

What happens if they miss? What happens if they make and URI doesn't call a time out? We have no time outs left. Is it f'in hockey? Can he jump over the boards?

The fact that the clock was magically stopped just deflects from the main point... which is how do you expect to get him back in the game regardless?
 
How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
A new coach would recruit and sign better players, or coach the players we have better, or hold the players we have accountable when they fail to perform, or try a new scheme when the one we've been trying stops working, or light a fire under the players so they don't regularly sleepwalk through an entire OOC schedule, or have better plans for the final five minutes or a game, or teach his players to be aggressive, or teach his players not to run away from offensive rebounds.
 
How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
I agree with you Annap! A new coach would make them shoot better because that’s what is part of Coaching: teaching/coaching/helping/assisting your players to be better. The ability to shoot competently is a part of the expectation of the job.
 
We are 328th in the ncaa in 3pt shooting pctg.
I get that things don't always work out like you hope or expect. But this stat also is a classic example of Mooney disconnect, or failure to put guys in position. Mooney has been telling us what a great shooting team this is. Yet we are actually one of the worst. Instead of putting the ball in Walz hand 30 feet out with back to basket. Maybe just maybe put in some tweaks and sets to get these all time shooter some better looks. And this is the kind of stuff that needs to be implemented in the summer. You see these deep dives into what Hurley is doing at uconn and ac Murray is finding new stuff to counter the defense. We keep running the offensd.
 
How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
You are absolutely right Nappy, this is the best that we could possibly expect at Poor Little Ol’ Richmond. That random NCAA tournament that we luck into sometime in the next 12 years is gonna be glorious!
 
Based on this clip from JOC after the game, Mooney's claim is that on two separate occasions, the officials did not let him sub in Dusan after the officials called a time out, something that he claims he had never heard of before and didn't know was a rule. So that means one of the following:

• This is the rule, and no one on our coaching staff, including our 20-year $1.3M-annual-salaried head coach, knew about it.
• This is not the rule, and no one on our coaching staff was able to produce the actual rule or ask the officials to look it up.
• This is not the rule, and Mooney did not raise absolute ungodly hell during and after the officials' failure to let Dusan back into the game, or during the press conference after the game.
• This is or is not the rule, but after the first time it happened, no one on our coaching staff learned a thing, and all of them were equally surprised when it then happened again 10 minutes later.
• Regardless of whether it is or isn't a rule, Mooney assumed that even though we had no timeouts left in overtime, he would somehow be able to sub Dusan back into the game.

All of these are bad. None of these are good. We lost the game because of coaching incompetence.
I love how the reporter just says “Uhhh” after that horrendous explanation basically saying, “really??? Thats all you got.”
 
How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Who recruited these great 3 point shooters and who is coaching them? Getting good looks consistently has something to do with that also Anna, or do you think tossing a desperation 3 between two defenders with 1 second on the clock is a high % shot.
Go back to bringing CM his morning tea and leave us be.
 
A new coach would recruit and sign better players, or coach the players we have better, or hold the players we have accountable when they fail to perform, or try a new scheme when the one we've been trying stops working, or light a fire under the players so they don't regularly sleepwalk through an entire OOC schedule, or have better plans for the final five minutes or a game, or teach his players to be aggressive, or teach his players not to run away from offensive rebounds.
Its pointless explaining the game to this Mooney sympathizer. His/her above comment should seal that expectation for all of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8legs1dream
Last night was a shining example of the lack of accountability in the program that is discussed here a lot. Coach could have said, I f’ed up, I’ve got to make sure Dusan is in the game and gets a touch at the end, but instead he’s blaming the refs for not making letting him make a sub when you aren’t allowed to sub? Twice?

The end of regulation possession looked like the last regulation possession of the OT A10 tournament game in 2017 against VCU - sub SDJ for Tynne and Nescovic for TJ. The “play” is for a sub 6 foot guard to iso and drive to the basket and don’t ever let your best offensive player in the game touch the ball?! Great strategy
 
It ends when we have a new coach. Oh, never mind.
How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
When you first addressed by initial post I thought you were posting tongue and cheek. But then I kind of changed to you actually believe what you posted. I could have responded to you with pages on this topic, as Mooney's shortcoming go way beyond his players missing 3 point shots. However, all the responses to you by our fellow posters included my ideas as well as others. These posters are sharp, astute, and observant.

I stand by what I said. "It ends when we have a new coach."

I guess my bigger question is this - Given what we've seen in 20 years of CM (track record, philosophy, strategies), do you think he is the guy to take us to the next level in the next 20 years? I'll go first. What you've seen in 20 will be what you'd see in the next 20. Not good enough. I don't even think he's the guy to take us forward into the next five years. It's way beyond time & overdue to move on with a new coaching staff completely external to UR. We need a fresh approach & new start.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT