This one deserves its own thread. I mean for the love of God, that was ineptitude to the Nth degree. Make it end.
It ends when we have a new coach. Oh, never mind.This one deserves its own thread. I mean for the love of God, that was ineptitude to the Nth degree. Make it end.
How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goalsIt ends when we have a new coach. Oh, never mind.
h. Substitutions shall not be permitted when the game clock has been
stopped after a successful field goal in the last 59.9 seconds of the second
half or of any extra period and before the clock has been properly started
except for the following:
1. Those substitutions permitted by rule, including, but not limited
to, injury, blood, violation, foul, disqualification, timeout, monitor
review for a score, or for a lost, displaced or irritated contact lens or
displaced eyeglasses; or
2. There shall be no substitutions during the dead-ball period when the
clock is stopped for a successful field goal to correct a timing mistake
or for an inadvertent whistle.
How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
No one is excusing the horrid play of the players. But what you are insinuating is that the coach isn’t responsible for the total product.How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
A new coach would recruit and sign better players, or coach the players we have better, or hold the players we have accountable when they fail to perform, or try a new scheme when the one we've been trying stops working, or light a fire under the players so they don't regularly sleepwalk through an entire OOC schedule, or have better plans for the final five minutes or a game, or teach his players to be aggressive, or teach his players not to run away from offensive rebounds.How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
I agree with you Annap! A new coach would make them shoot better because that’s what is part of Coaching: teaching/coaching/helping/assisting your players to be better. The ability to shoot competently is a part of the expectation of the job.How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
I get that things don't always work out like you hope or expect. But this stat also is a classic example of Mooney disconnect, or failure to put guys in position. Mooney has been telling us what a great shooting team this is. Yet we are actually one of the worst. Instead of putting the ball in Walz hand 30 feet out with back to basket. Maybe just maybe put in some tweaks and sets to get these all time shooter some better looks. And this is the kind of stuff that needs to be implemented in the summer. You see these deep dives into what Hurley is doing at uconn and ac Murray is finding new stuff to counter the defense. We keep running the offensd.We are 328th in the ncaa in 3pt shooting pctg.
You are absolutely right Nappy, this is the best that we could possibly expect at Poor Little Ol’ Richmond. That random NCAA tournament that we luck into sometime in the next 12 years is gonna be glorious!How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
I love how the reporter just says “Uhhh” after that horrendous explanation basically saying, “really??? Thats all you got.”Based on this clip from JOC after the game, Mooney's claim is that on two separate occasions, the officials did not let him sub in Dusan after the officials called a time out, something that he claims he had never heard of before and didn't know was a rule. So that means one of the following:
• This is the rule, and no one on our coaching staff, including our 20-year $1.3M-annual-salaried head coach, knew about it.
• This is not the rule, and no one on our coaching staff was able to produce the actual rule or ask the officials to look it up.
• This is not the rule, and Mooney did not raise absolute ungodly hell during and after the officials' failure to let Dusan back into the game, or during the press conference after the game.
• This is or is not the rule, but after the first time it happened, no one on our coaching staff learned a thing, and all of them were equally surprised when it then happened again 10 minutes later.
• Regardless of whether it is or isn't a rule, Mooney assumed that even though we had no timeouts left in overtime, he would somehow be able to sub Dusan back into the game.
All of these are bad. None of these are good. We lost the game because of coaching incompetence.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Who recruited these great 3 point shooters and who is coaching them? Getting good looks consistently has something to do with that also Anna, or do you think tossing a desperation 3 between two defenders with 1 second on the clock is a high % shot.How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
Its pointless explaining the game to this Mooney sympathizer. His/her above comment should seal that expectation for all of us.A new coach would recruit and sign better players, or coach the players we have better, or hold the players we have accountable when they fail to perform, or try a new scheme when the one we've been trying stops working, or light a fire under the players so they don't regularly sleepwalk through an entire OOC schedule, or have better plans for the final five minutes or a game, or teach his players to be aggressive, or teach his players not to run away from offensive rebounds.
It ends when we have a new coach. Oh, never mind.
When you first addressed by initial post I thought you were posting tongue and cheek. But then I kind of changed to you actually believe what you posted. I could have responded to you with pages on this topic, as Mooney's shortcoming go way beyond his players missing 3 point shots. However, all the responses to you by our fellow posters included my ideas as well as others. These posters are sharp, astute, and observant.How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
Both probably think great effort keeping it close without DH.How do you all think Queally and Hardt react to the last possessions of this game and the obvious incompetence of Mooney?
I mean, leaving the best player on the team having a career game on the bench because of your incredibly stupid over coaching strategy and poor knowledge of simple rules. I guess they just think “oh well, another loss. At least these moron dans keep buying tickets.”
Oh wait, we know what Queally thinks, he is obviously going by Annapspider on this board.
How many of those were bad looks at the basket when the shot clock is at 2 or 1? Way too many times we’re working the shot clock down to nothing and launching bad shots. It’s more deep than just looking at the numbers and blaming the players. It’s a system problem.How many 3’s did we miss? Would a new coach make those 3s ? We got 6 out of 27 , we shot 36% field goals
Yep , a new coach would make them shoot better.
Just got off the plane from 11 days in Ecuador and the Galapagos. Based on the apparent state of things here, perhaps I should go back off the grid.
Completely agree and especially bold 8L! Forget the analytics coaches use today, IMO too much but basic old school stats says stop it.We aren't going to shoot better. So maybe stop shooting 30 threes a game, because we're only going to make about six of them, and since you coach your teams to run away from offensive rebounds, we're just handing the other team free possession after free possession.
Literally try ANYTHING else. Run-and-gun. Forty minutes of hell. Four corners offense. Three centers and two forwards. LITERALLY ANYTHING ELSE.
This is mind-numbing insanity.
Let's all just enjoy some foots today! The Commanders fans down there and the Eagle fan I am and also believe @97spiderfan and @PhillySpider are.
Welcome aboard. It's less painful this way.20 years of experience coach says this is his best shooting team of all time.
17 games proves that his knowledge of his own team is greatly flawed.
I think yesterday pushed me over the edge as far as the program goes. I think I'm done being an active fan - watching games live, planning my schedule to attend nearby games in advance, posting on this board about the minutiae of the program. If I have nothing else at all (and I mean nothing) going on that day/evening, I'll consider watching a game or part of one, but that's it.
It all now boils down to the same point and I've said my piece enough times, but it's obvious that the school, AD, boosters do not care about being a big time winning program. They are okay with a culture of comfort.
So to continue to actively support the program is just a waste of my time. Nothing will change in the program, so I have to change my habits. From what I understand, they'll just find a new fan to replace me though. Be on the lookout for Brookline Brownstone, that guy's a newbie and will likely love Moon.
I was thinking 80’s fan. Guys has disappearedHow do you all think Queally and Hardt react to the last possessions of this game and the obvious incompetence of Mooney?
I mean, leaving the best player on the team having a career game on the bench because of your incredibly stupid over coaching strategy and poor knowledge of simple rules. I guess they just think “oh well, another loss. At least these moron dans keep buying tickets.”
Oh wait, we know what Queally thinks, he is obviously going by Annapspider on this board.