Danny Rocco was a very fine coach. The depth of our program should be commended, and he gets credit for that. I can and will rattle off 5 of my favorite Spider games of all time that happened in the past two years, and thank him for those.
But this idolatry as the best coach in UR history, and Huesman/Clawson/London not even being able sniff his jock is ludicrous and ignores the
facts.
Rocco's teams were 5-3 in the playoffs.
- 2 of those 5 wins were first round home games against MEAC teams. Remember, according to you, VT, MEAC "isn't real FCS football, and they're coached by idiots." Those first round "play-in" games didn't even exist during the prior regimes, so let's discard them so we're comparing apples to apples. I'm going to assume that if Clawson's and London's Spider teams got to play a home MEAC play-in game, they would have won too.
- His teams went 2-1 in the round of 16, including a blowout loss at a Coastal Carolina team that had no business blowing us out. Both London and Clawson went 2-0 in the round of 16. Huesman was DC for 3 of those 4 wins.
- His teams were 1-1 in the quarterfinals. London and Clawson were also 1-1 in the quarterfinals. I may need to check my history, but I don't think either of their teams lost 38-0.
- He was 0-1 in the semifinals, losing to the dynasty defending national champion, just like Clawson. At least Clawson's team was in the game in the second half. Obviously, London was 1-0 in semifinals, and 1-0 in the finals.
- So, in summary, from the round of 16 on - Rocco 3-3, Clawson 3-2, London 5-1. Huesman as DC 7-2.