I agree with much of this post but saying its just one of the tools used by the committee is true only for teams on the bubble, probably above the 35 spot, but its all the committee needs to justify teams below that number. Teams Net 25-35 are pretty much guaranteed a spot, even though many of their resumes are quesrtionable to deserve such a ranking ie. St. Mary’s every year.
2023–24 NET Ratings
- Thread starter SFspidur
- Start date
That's just giving us the auto bid based on current regular season standings.
Dayton at a 3-seed is aggressive.
Dayton at a 3-seed is aggressive.
Understood but fun to see - I have held off booking my flight to Spokane.
Last edited:
let's just win the A10 tourney and stay in Brooklyn for a week shooting on the same rims.
Yep it seems that beating up on cupcakes is what matters most in this moronic system lol
Interested to see if a 14 point win at Fordham moves the needle more than a 5 point win against a top 20 team at home
If we won by 15 it would be 60 lol. I was hollering at Mooney when he pulled the starters up 18 with 1:45 left. Doesnt he know the crazy NET algorithm lol
Last edited:
The 6 spot live increase in kenpom (thru about half tonight games) is mildly encouraging for the Net
In this bracket, we knocked Villanova out of the dance.
Men's Bracketology: Kentucky and the Champions Classic prove why November games matter
Duke and Alabama are proof that early-season matchups can affect March seeding. They drop off the top line -- to the delight of UConn and Auburn.
www.espn.com
The Fordham TV guys pretty much guaranteed us a spot in the dance. Hopefully one of them is on the committee.
I am watching a replay and these guys need to be hired to do PR. They love the Spiders. The 1935 look back was great too.
Its nice to see but I still think its only because they are giving us the Auto bid. Wonder where they would have UR if not for leading the A10.In this bracket, we knocked Villanova out of the dance.
Men's Bracketology: Kentucky and the Champions Classic prove why November games matter
Duke and Alabama are proof that early-season matchups can affect March seeding. They drop off the top line -- to the delight of UConn and Auburn.www.espn.com
Memphis lost to # 248 at home. Lets see how much they drop. This shoud be a resume wrecking loss for mid major at 55.
Rice … at home.
Rice will go ip 5 spots
Memphis will go down from 35 to 38. Lol
Rice … at home.
Rice will go ip 5 spots
Memphis will go down from 35 to 38. Lol
Last edited:
Hopefully we won’t have to worry about it bc we will continue to win!
if you have ESPN+, you can watch the replay there ... I don't see anything posted on youtube at this point.
The NET is frustrating. What would it be if we left starters in & won by 20+.
We r seeing better #s in other metrics.
Hasla 62 similar to Torvik. But…
KPI 39
SOR 49
Old RPI 48
We r seeing better #s in other metrics.
Hasla 62 similar to Torvik. But…
KPI 39
SOR 49
Old RPI 48
I’m more upset that Wichita loses at Tulsa and drops 11. They are already our worse loss. They were 7-1 after beating us, 2-11 since…
American Conference at Bracketologists
bracketologists.com
Last edited:
Agree that one loss is what is dragging down the NET bigtime. Team must have found a party in Wichita the night before the game. Its the only way to explain it.I’m more upset that Wichita loses at Tulsa and drops 11. They are already our worse loss. They were 7-1 after beating us, 2-11 since…
American Conference at Bracketologists
at this pace, just 14 more consecutive wins and we'll be NET #50.
8legs1dream
Graduate Assistant
Its true. Does anyone know what UR’s NET was before this 11 game win streak started?
And this one has a graph near the top
Richmond Spiders Nitty Gritty at Bracketologists
bracketologists.com
looks like our last 8 wins barely helped us recover from an awful January 23rd ... when we didn't even play.And this one has a graph near the top
Richmond Spiders Nitty Gritty at Bracketologists
Aren't the FU announcers students? The school has a very good track record of turning out professional sports announcers and pbp guys, I thought that it was always students cutting their teeth who did the games. Maybe that's WFUV, their radio call? I thought they were more than fair to UR, loved King and were highly complimentary of Richmond's precision and approach. As they mentioned during that interminable delay, their broadcast location was on the teams' side of the court but I don't think it was courtside, so they couldn't hear the discussion. So yeah, being in the dark for 7 minutes was not great, but so were the coaches, players, fans in attendance - those refs really did a bad job on that review - so it was not just everyone watching, it was everyone, period.
Similarly, I'm unsure if they had a monitor for replays (my guess not) based on the setup of Rose Hill. Which is good for young announcers not to get addicted to just rehashing the same plays twice and constantly going to the monitor to describe action, while forcing them to call what they see and react in real time.
Similarly, I'm unsure if they had a monitor for replays (my guess not) based on the setup of Rose Hill. Which is good for young announcers not to get addicted to just rehashing the same plays twice and constantly going to the monitor to describe action, while forcing them to call what they see and react in real time.
Nah, the TV announcers were pros...they were talking about how the analyst got called up to fill in on at least one Nets game last week. He's been a broadcaster for 20 years. Play-by-play guy has also been doing it for a decade. Both Fordham grads though. Sideline reporter was a former Fordham player who graduated a couple years ago and is working her way into the business.
