ADVERTISEMENT

2023–24 NET Ratings

Seems like a big fall for a road loss to a team in roughly the same ranking range. Maybe a lot had to do with the horrible loss someone was reporting northern Iowa was having...
 
The numbers don't like UR, they don't now and won't in a couple weeks. Don't let it stress you - the damage was done months ago. We lost some to some teams OOC that it turns out are outright dogs, which is why we're sweating every single game in conference. Beat WSU and UNI and a loss at VCU as an 18-3 team would sting, but the buffer would be there. But it isn't so the sting is exponential with regard to the rest of the season. There is simply no safety net (no pun intended.) UR needs a lot of wins - a whole lot - and hopefully to be the regular season A10 champs for an at large to be in play. Those two things are what would counter the NET, probably nothing else IMO.
 
Agree 100% Brownstone. Just need to keep winning. Yes, the earlier season opportunities missed dug us a big hole. That is why a bunch of us on this board were so bummed, with the better defense, and King, and better offensive flow it really seemed that those were winnable games that we either played down to the competition (Wichita, UNI) or did not raise to the competition. Just need to win out - maybe one loss - and beat VCU in return game. It is out there for the taking. But yes, it seems like the Net and KP numbers will only move a little based on the body of work.
 
But yes, it seems like the Net and KP numbers will only move a little based on the body of work.
The net total for the Spiders will not move up precipitously, but expect them to move down with a loss. Richmond went from 68 last week after the Dayton win to 74 now.
 
You know how you game a mathematical system? You win all those games you're supposed to - as a team and as a conference.

But you cannot do it if
1) You don't take care of business OOC yourself.
2) Multiple league teams regularly put up losing records OOC. Big East only has Depaul as an anchor and even they usually hover around .500 OOC before their plunge. Everyone else goes 11-2 or better. I did a breakdown of the BE nonsensical SOS numbers probably 4 years ago when we were bubbling and up against some BE teams for at large spot. Some of them come into league play with OOC SOS numbers around 300 that magically jumped to top 75 or top 50 by end of league play bc they get to play only teams with winning records (and Depawful.) Too lazy to look that post up, but it was staggering jumps, made possible by a smaller league with teams that all won OOC and won big (except Depawful.)
 
Clearly some leagues are scheduling bad OOC but making sure they dominate every game. If all teams in the league do that, they are good in league play no matter what happens.
 
Last edited:
We have a really good team this year. I really hope they are awarded with a bid. It's tough to be in a good league and still need to go 16-2 or 15-3 at worse. We can do it. It's just really hard even with a fantastic team. Go Spiders! Make it happen!
 
  • Like
Reactions: gcarter52
I herd the coaching staff speak on on this very issue, relative to if they change how they manage the game near the end of regulation to maximize NET. Their comment was that is was difficult to evaluate how margin would impact NET and this had to be weighted against the value of developing players on the team. I believe they put a premium on player development and team culture over a slightly better NET and I agree with their philosophy.
If our NET is 120 right now, yeah, who really gives a shit, play the younger guys in blow outs. But it isn't, we are among a handful of teams right now that are competing for a smaller handful of at large bids, so that philosophy needs to take a back seat at present.

And you know what we would be great for team culture, playing in the NCAA's, probably way more than Aiden Noyes getting 2 minutes of action at the end of blowout where his basic instructions are to dribble the ball around and run out the clock.

We need to squeeze every last ounce out of the NET every opportunity we get right now.
 
We've been out of the auto bid slot with Lunardi since Dayton moved a half game ahead of us in the standings earlier this week, but we're on his radar for at-large in his update today. 14th team out! :)

And as he says, we'll move back into the auto bid slot if Dayton loses tonight.

 
We've been out of the auto bid slot with Lunardi since Dayton moved a half game ahead of us in the standings earlier this week, but we're on his radar for at-large in his update today. 14th team out! :)

And as he says, we'll move back into the auto bid slot if Dayton loses tonight.

Damn you Princeton!

And we have a much better program than Gonzaga!

{Thats how you do sarcasm}
 
We've been out of the auto bid slot with Lunardi since Dayton moved a half game ahead of us in the standings earlier this week, but we're on his radar for at-large in his update today. 14th team out! :)

And as he says, we'll move back into the auto bid slot if Dayton loses tonight.

Wait, it will help us if we have to root for VCU? I just don't know that I can do that.
 
Watching the Gameday telecast now and what I find interesting is that Dayton is listed as a 4 seed stll. Their status doesnt change at all after losing to two teams not considered very good in NET and the teams who beat them dont go up in status.
I know its good that Dayton keep a high profile and seed, but it validstes the idea that once the rankings are set after the OOC they pretty much stay there. I think Dayton could lose a couple more conference games and still barely budge in the rankings.
 
I

Shit. You mean the NET might not be contrived entirely against us. vcu gained 4, while we gained 6 for beating Dayton.

Just keep winning, baby!!
Not contrived against UR but rather this shows again that the rankings are already set .
 
Watching the Gameday telecast now and what I find interesting is that Dayton is listed as a 4 seed stll. Their status doesnt change at all after losing to two teams not considered very good in NET and the teams who beat them dont go up in status.
I know its good that Dayton keep a high profile and seed, but it validstes the idea that once the rankings are set after the OOC they pretty much stay there. I think Dayton could lose a couple more conference games and still barely budge in the rankings.
Yes, out of conference matters a lot. And Richmond and vcu are not bad teams, so it's not going to kill them to lose to them on the road.
 
The upside to last night is that now our loss there shouldn't count much against us, since the alleged "best" team in three league did, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PalmTreeSpidUR
It’s taken four wins including this big one and they still haven’t quite recovered from the 24-spot drop they suffered a few weeks ago getting blown out by a bad Air Force team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section9.RowD
I’d like to ask vt4700 if he thinks Dayton was still “not close to a must win”. I died on that must win hill he didn’t like it. Just don’t see any way 14-4 a10 w a loss to Dayton as 4700 surmised possibly puts us on bubble. With how Net operates it would kill us, too hard for us to make gains. Seems it will take crazy a10 record like not losing just to be in low net 50s.

It’s better for board & board activity when he’s posting imo. tho I realize not all agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section9.RowD
Not on topic but watching Wake/Duke game and I cant believe how DUMB these coaches are for numerously calling TO’s to stop runs and momentum. How could they possibly think that is a good idea? I guess they didnt read the Mooney “always wait for the media timeout” section in the coaching handbook.
 
Kind of crazy how angry people are with the NET here when it has given us a very favorable resume in terms of quad based wins, which is much more important for the committee than a teams NET ranking.
This X 1000

We're still debating the NET on here while not understanding how it is actually used. Nothing has changed.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT