ADVERTISEMENT

Apostolos Roumoglou - Transfer Commit

I'm pulling for him. Loved how he was adamant that he is playing for the present day and not worrying about the future. Hope he can play some D and do some rebounding from the wing. Also like the mentality he said they were taught at Uconn to essentially raise up to the challenge when things were at the worst. At least that was my interpretation. Hope it all translates on the court in games.

Next year

Quinn, Golden, TJ were all finesse/skill guys at the center position. Yes, they could do more skill wise than Walz but they also lacked his physically imposing presence. Should make for a nice contrast between him and Beagle.
not sure Beagle and Walz are much of a contrast. I think they're more like each other than either is like TJ, Golden, or Quinn.
those are 3 really good centers to live up to.

Next year

I agree with Philly. Beagle right now is easiest to see game translating. Tho I think he was better than solid. AEC rookie of the year is no joke. The issue is it doesn't look like he'll get the same MPG at Richmond with Walz there. he was getting 30+ at Albany. I feel good about that duo at the 5. Arguably our strongest position. Walz is an Ox and I like his developing game. If they are that, probably best if we could get them some time together on court. tbd if feasible. not sure if either can play the 4. We've had a non shooter in Cayo before tho. Cayo was a better ball handler. I'd like if 1 of them can show the forward skills because I feel like split time at 5 we might not be getting all they bring. Possible 1 owns that spot and takes more time too.
Agree with this. We have the potential to have our best tandem at center in a long time. As you note, Beagle was the AEC rookie of the year, best freshman in an entire conference, means he can play. And yes, Walz is a full grown man. Quinn, Golden, TJ were all finesse/skill guys at the center position. Yes, they could do more skill wise than Walz but they also lacked his physically imposing presence. Should make for a nice contrast between him and Beagle. And will be interesting if Mooney plays them on the court together. Mooney has generally avoided it, despite the urging from this board, and the few times he has tried it, the results have been meh at best.

Next year

Our transfer situation and who will and won't play and how much they can contribute is really very interesting Two distinct groups of transfers. Three guys (Beagle, White, Nescovic) who were solid (but not spectacular) at lower levels and two guys who basically have no track record but come from blue blood programs. I really have no idea what to expect from any of them.

Can the three upward guys even be the same guys they were at last stops (much less pull a King and actually improve?) Can either of the downward two be an impact player at this level after doing zero at the last? No idea on any of it to be honest! And I'd say almost anyone on here who has an opinion - it isn't going to be the most well informed opinion because its really all guess work! Lots of hoping!

Beagle to me is probably the easiest to see his game translate. Assume he will rebound, shoot a good percentage and score a bit. Not sure at all about his defense or passing. But he's the easiest to me to see him being at least decent. But not even with that is it clear to me how much he contributes because I don't know that I see him being better than Walz. This is the one where I'd venture an educated guess that these two come pretty close to splitting time.

Nescovic probably has the best track record, but even that is hard to say. Predominately a shooter and that can sometimes not translate up against bigger and more athletic competition. I'd feel better about him if I knew he could just be a complementary scorer and play off a primary scorer. But I am still squinting trying to see a primary scorer for us! But if I am guessing (and to be clear we are all guessing) he's the one I'd slot for 30+ minutes.

White is the hardest of the experienced three to see how it will go. His best year was back in 20-21. He's had 5 seasons of college ball and they seem sorta all the same. No big step up, but seemingly solid. Just don't know how that translates when now he is in a new system for 1st time in 6 years and playing against better competition. He's the toughest for to see being a big contributor. The guard room is crowded. Hunt is clearly going to get good minutes. I also love Tyne. Think he has a chance to join the UR small PG legacy. He can (really!!) defend, he's tough, can handle etc. If he can step up his shooting and add a little bit of finishing, he can be really good and I think he can and will take a big step this year. If he does, White's opportunity will be limited.

And the downward two i have literally no idea. But I think we need to really hit on one! Walz and beagle should be OK in the middle. Neskovic will (hopefully) hold down a forward slot and there are options in the backcourt such that we should be ok - albeit lacking a King kinda guy). But we need a wing and we need a dynamic player of some sort. Tyne has a chance to be dynamic but might still be a year away from that and not sure anyone else of those mentioned is going to ever be dynamic. One of these guys two transfer down guys needs to be good for us IMHO. No idea which, but ideally its Roumoglu because of his size.

Mostly about the uncertainty surrounding the new transfers and I think we will live and die with how they do, but a big step from Tanner would go along way too. I am not mentioning Roache here because I just don't see him as part of a successful season. He is so limited (even when healthy) that I think its a bad sign if he is getting many minutes!

Also not sure what kind of identity we can create with this group. We were good last year because we were surprisingly really good on defense. We won with our defense. Quinn was a really good post defender, king was solid and Hunt, DJI and Harris were all excellent and Bigs was solid too. Not sure we can muster of that level of defense from amongst this group. This group I think is going to need to "old school" UR and be really efficient and smart on offense and probably need to have everyone be a threat and hope we can find a defense we can get by with. I am not so sure it will be the same version of man-to-man we saw last year - might need to a little more pack line style man and try to outsmart and outlast guys on our defensive end.

Biggest thing to me is what has already been mentioned a lot on the boards - - we don't appear to have a real dynamic player (an alpha in some other posts) and its going to be really hard to win a bunch without one emerging! Pretty sure its not any of the transfer up three. But, could be (and hoping it is) one of the transfer down guys and think it might be Tyne by seasons end if he doesn't end up being beaten down too much by having to be it too early!
I think you are way under estimating the quality of the transfers "(Beagle, White, Nescovic) who were solid (but not spectacular)" and quality of the team. All 3 of the guys you mentioned as "not spectacular" are potential starters, although they will have difficult competition at each position. I am very high on this team.

2024–25 schedule

Highly doubt we are playing some 3 dimensional chess game with the NET here. Much more likely we just screwed the pooch on the schedule, didn't get into a quality MTE in time, had to settle for some garbage tournament at the last minute, a couple of our better games backed out and we didn't have any contigency plans for when that happened.

Poor planning and poor execution by those in charge of making the schedule. Let's just call a spade a spade.

What piece was UR 's own Joe LUNARDI in our next dimensional chess game...Pawn?

imo that's all another reason to go after the real hard schedules. If you are only trying for minimal hard games (and we've never done two road buy games vs. majors in a season so unfortunately I don't think we're trying for those) when u fail too much u end up with bad schedules. If u consistently trying for hard, national schedule when u fail too much u end up with a least solid schedules imo. And again those years when it's too hard...so what...it's still good for the program visibility etc etc. We won't and don't get at large consideration with weak ooc schedules. The evidence is we get in or would have gotten in with hard schedules with lots of majors (wherever u get them). Majors can play chess, they have the league schedule to fall back on, at UR let's play checkers keep it simple u can't game the NET at A10 level the A10 isn't good enough. Cue the just win more strategy. I'm all for it. waiting 20 years and counting.

**I have this in cut & paste mode now and I just change up a few words here & there

really the intentional "schedule softly" u understand a bit for those coaches that are under pressure to win. doesn't apply to Mooney. he has the best job secrity in the country at one of the top basketball programs in the nation.

Next year

We saw last year that transfers can come in and immediately perform at an all A10 level. Will be interesting to see if Mooney can keep that up, his system had a reputation on this board for taking years to learn in the past.
I think that reputation was because of the defense we used to employ. It was unique and took time to learn. I think we scrapped that defense a few years back after getting torched on it and we now employ more traditional defensive sets.
  • Like
Reactions: fan2011

Next year

I think Dusan's offensive game will translate. Ivy is a good league. he's a scorer with enough size.
no idea what he brings defensively though. that's a question all the newcomers have to answer.
we were unusually strong defensively last year. it's why we won. but many of our best defender have moved on.

Next year

Dusan is a wild card - as Philly alluded we have quite a few wild cards for upcoming year. On one hand he had big games against both Duke and SLU. On other hand a little more pedestrian vs top IVY's Princeton and Yale averaging 13.
  • Like
Reactions: urfan1

2024 Richmond Spiders Football - Opponents Countdown - Wofford

Vegas is way off the mark on this one:

We are not as good as we think and Wofford is far better than we think.This is going to be a tight one.

O/44.4

-16

  • Like
Reactions: URTOM68

2024–25 schedule

Highly doubt we are playing some 3 dimensional chess game with the NET here. Much more likely we just screwed the pooch on the schedule, didn't get into a quality MTE in time, had to settle for some garbage tournament at the last minute, a couple of our better games backed out and we didn't have any contigency plans for when that happened.

Poor planning and poor execution by those in charge of making the schedule. Let's just call a spade a spade.
well thank goodness we were able to hold Auburn to their agreement, imagine this schedule replacing them with Middle Backwoods A&M Community College

2024–25 schedule

Highly doubt we are playing some 3 dimensional chess game with the NET here. Much more likely we just screwed the pooch on the schedule, didn't get into a quality MTE in time, had to settle for some garbage tournament at the last minute, a couple of our better games backed out and we didn't have any contigency plans for when that happened.

Poor planning and poor execution by those in charge of making the schedule. Let's just call a spade a spade.
probably right. but it does seem like a lot of teams are avoiding playing teams in the 100s and even 200s. the math seems to tell teams to 1) play the top 100 types and 2) fill in the rest with sure wins from the 300 types.

we just skipped the 1st part.

2024–25 schedule

agreed, but I don't think it was this soft intentionally. need to do better.
but maybe analytics based on NET says this is the way to go. I don't know.
Highly doubt we are playing some 3 dimensional chess game with the NET here. Much more likely we just screwed the pooch on the schedule, didn't get into a quality MTE in time, had to settle for some garbage tournament at the last minute, a couple of our better games backed out and we didn't have any contigency plans for when that happened.

Poor planning and poor execution by those in charge of making the schedule. Let's just call a spade a spade.

2024–25 schedule

we're not going to lose 5 or 6 with this OOC schedule.
if we do then we were right to schedule softly, because we're not as good as we thought.
Well, that all feeds back to the mentality. We need to go with the mentality and schedule with the mentality that we are going to be good every year. Mooney and PQ have shown that they can compete and get players in the portal. No reason not to have expectations. Absolutely no reason to think about "schedule softly".
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT