Opening Night Lineup - Just for fun
- By VT4700
- UR Basketball Board
- 162 Replies
Dusan needs Hunt type minutes. Give him 35 a game. Roche needs more than 12, and Tyne and Tanner need less.
Dusan too.Giving my completely honest assessment from what I have seen the past 4 games, I think we only have 2 A10 caliber level players on this roster right now. Hunt, who is an A10 level starter, and Beagle who is an A10 level role player. It's a small sample size of 4 games, but that is how I see things are right now. So might as well try something different in terms of player rotations, different line-ups during the game, and see if that helps bring out player abilities more.
Excellent point. Been forever since he has been mentioned for a big job, probably since 2012 or so.Yeah, and not 1 higher level program has even inquired about Mooney for the good part of the last decade. Wonder why???
Yes, agree with both here. I was thinking the same - he is Noyes all over again. Not looking for his offense at all, except when he has to and it ends bad. If he is the shooter we heard about preseason, he needs to be shot ready. Classic guy that is just looking for the next pass as soon as the ball hits his hands.Yep, Tanner is giving me some Noyes vibes too. You can't play 37 minutes in a game and score 2 points.
Then, start Roche, or play GW3, Robinson, or McGlothin.yeah, but replacing him with a guy who played 27 minutes and scored 0 doesn't seem like much of an upgrade.
I realize we don't currently have a lot of choices.
yeah, but replacing him with a guy who played 27 minutes and scored 0 doesn't seem like much of an upgrade.You can't play 37 minutes in a game and score 2 points.
And not even get to the line. His last 2 games: 60 minutes, 1-10 FG ( 1-4 from 3). 0-0 FT and only 1 total assist. Pretty much 0 positive impact offensively in those 60 minutes.Yep, Tanner is giving me some Noyes vibes too. You can't play 37 minutes in a game and score 2 points.
Yep, Tanner is giving me some Noyes vibes too. You can't play 37 minutes in a game and score 2 points.I also think Tanner's defense has been fine ( he had 5 steals last game and has not been getting beat much), but his offense has been non existent. He has to impact the game more if he is gonna get the minutes he is getting. Against D1 teams, he is 2-13 ( 1-5 from 3). He played 37 minutes last game, scored 2 points and didn't even get to the line. And that is against Bucknell and not even one of the better A-10 teams. I would love for him to find something and turn things around, but it looks like we have another Noyes here.
I also think Tanner's defense has been fine ( he had 5 steals last game and has not been getting beat much), but his offense has been non existent. He has to impact the game more if he is gonna get the minutes he is getting. Against D1 teams, he is 2-13 ( 1-5 from 3). He played 37 minutes last game, scored 2 points and didn't even get to the line. And that is against Bucknell and not even one of the better A-10 teams. I would love for him to find something and turn things around, but it looks like we have another Noyes here.I'm hopeful AP can be great but I can't move him into the starting lineup when he's shooting 18% from 3, 20% from 2, and 50% from the line! plus the dumb technical. let him have a great game off the bench first please. it'll happen.
I'm not as down on Tanner as some of you. he should be more aggressive shooting from outside. he needs to listen to the analytics and stop with the midrange pullups. but I disagree with the talk that his defense is so bad. he's defending. plus he and Roche are the only 2 guys hitting a respectable percentage from 3.
Always assumed you were in your mid to upper 30s based on your picture ..Epic regular season NBA game tonight. 15-0 Cavaliers going into to take on defending champ Celtics. Was thinking of going but too old to make the round trip into Boston. At least save some $. Can't wait to watch this one tonight.
NCAA wants to sell tickets. A game that can be hyped.Ironic that he has set up a CAA vs Patriot League play in to meet UR.
Have to wonder if continue to stink, if the decision to redshirt isn't changed.3-0 Evening brings me to 6-4. Though would have been glad to take the L on the Aztecs game if they could have won, but with top scorer out and hobbled starter did not see them having the offense to hang with Gonzaga. It's funny, they have similar freshman class in a big guard/wing and a very athletic, yet developing skill big forward (also a little undersized). They have been getting good time, and are in a four game gauntlet that will get those freshman some great experience. Wish our freshman would be un shirted and get some run. Not sure how in this environment you red shirt.
Yeah, and not 1 higher level program has even inquired about Mooney for the good part of the last decade. Wonder why???I will say, I have always felt that one indicator of a great program/coach at the mid-major level is how often its coaches move up to the higher level. Its certainly not the only factor, but it is a sign of success in my opinion. For instance, VCU has had Shaka, Will Wade, and Mike Rhoades all come and go to higher level programs in the past 10-15 years. Typically the coaches that have stayed at one program have had tremendous national level success like Coach K, Roy Williams, Boheim, Mark Few. Mooney is certainly not in that category. But there is a category below that where guys like McKillop and Mark Schmidt from the A10 are in, where I think UR administration feels Mooney falls into. When we think of other coaches at UR like Roussell for women basketball, Chemotti for men's lacrosse, or even Allison Kwolek who left WLax to be coach at Clemson, their names will likely be at least mentioned as an option to fill coaching positions vacancies at bigger name programs every year.
WW, L, W
14-8
VMI vs Pitt o/u 156.5, taking the under