ADVERTISEMENT

Weaver into the portal

Maybe I'm just getting old, but it's weird to me to see a 4 year walk-on and graduate "entering the transfer portal".
It's not just you. As soon as I saw the Kentucky kid and his girlfriend had "luxury cars" stolen from them, and then seeing Kentucky players advertising TurboTax in a commercial, I realized that college sports as we knew it is dead. There's still bits and pieces of the days of old but they're usually in the lower levels of the sport.
 
  • Like
Reactions: plydogg and urfan1
Maybe I'm just getting old, but it's weird to me to see a 4 year walk-on and graduate "entering the transfer portal".
I think at this point the portal is just the "vehicle" in essence if he wants to attempt to play anywhere else his final grad year. Hope Liam ends up getting some minutes for some lower end D1 school ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: urfan1
Historians are going to look back at this time and be absolutely amazed that this multi-billion dollar college sports industry had relatively free labor for as long as it did.
I hold both of these stances:

Im all for students being able to make money just like anyone else is able to. Just because they are athletes shouldn't mean they can't capitalize on their talents.

AND

Nobody was forcing these pre-NIL students to play for free. They knew what they were signing up for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 97spiderfan
Nobody was forcing these pre-NIL students to play for free. They knew what they were signing up for.
the ncaa had rules in place to forbid any payments to players. heck, if the team bus got back late and the cafeteria was closed, a booster couldn't buy a pizza for the team without the school being charged with providing improper benefits.

I may have the legal term wrong, but it's basically collusion ... making a rule for all the schools that nobody can pay players, so all the schools benefit.

players are now getting paid what they're "worth".
you can certainly feel they aren't worth the money they get, but the market decides that. nobody forced Duke to pay Cooper Flagg $5M or whatever he's getting. but to them he's worth it.
 
Last edited:
I may have missed this, but is there an active market for players like Liam? Walkons who barely played feel like a low demand profile but perhaps I’m missing something.
 
Consider this heading... Weaver into Portal.... One must wonder what portal Kass Weaver has entered.

 
  • Like
Reactions: urfan1
Most of that athletics "revenue" comes from the university's general pocket into athletics' pocket.
not sure where in that you see that most of the revenue comes from the school.
point is college athletes generate revenue. certainly men's basketball revenue greatly exceeds the mens basketball players' scholarships.
 
Gate receipts may equal 750,000 per year. That is 5000 (fans) x 25 (price per ticket) x 6 (home games = 750,000.
Concessions may generate 200,000 in revenue.
The rest has to come from donations. Does our football team generate $9M in donations?
 
not sure where in that you see that most of the revenue comes from the school.
point is college athletes generate revenue. certainly men's basketball revenue greatly exceeds the mens basketball players' scholarships.
It's not explicitly broken down, but I can guarantee you that "institutional support" (ie. shifting money from one pocket to the other) is the lion's share of athletics "revenue" at UR.

At the most obvious, there's no way swimming, women's soccer, field hockey, women's lax, and track and field are each generating real revenue of $1m–$1.5m each.

Football ain't generating anywhere near $8m in revenue. The only one with a snowball's chance of coming close to expenses is men's hoops.

$47m in total athletics revenue is complete fiction if you don't count pocket-shifting.
 
Gate receipts may equal 750,000 per year. That is 5000 (fans) x 25 (price per ticket) x 6 (home games = 750,000.
Concessions may generate 200,000 in revenue.
The rest has to come from donations. Does our football team generate $9M in donations?
"These revenues include appearance guarantees, concessions, contributions from alumni and others, institutional support, program advertising and sales, radio and television, royalties, signage and other sponsorships, sports camps, ticket andluxury box sales, and any other revenues attributable to intercollegiate athletic activities."
 
It's not explicitly broken down, but I can guarantee you that "institutional support" (ie. shifting money from one pocket to the other) is the lion's share of athletics "revenue" at UR.

At the most obvious, there's no way swimming, women's soccer, field hockey, women's lax, and track and field are each generating real revenue of $1m–$1.5m each.

Football ain't generating anywhere near $8m in revenue. The only one with a snowball's chance of coming close to expenses is men's hoops.

$47m in total athletics revenue is complete fiction if you don't count pocket-shifting.
agreed ... women's field hockey isn't likely generating $1.4M.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT