No other team has three in the top 15, as I said. We have plenty of talent.
Eight giving Mooney too much credit? Now I've seen everything.yeah, I'm in no way being critical of our players. I just think the talk that "there's no way we shouldn't make the tournament" is a little much.
I agree, Eight, that Mooney has put together a pretty strong roster. you might be giving him too much credit though, in my opinion.
If only we were competing for the Atlantic 10 two-on-two fistfight championship.That may be the case. However, in a two-on-two fistfight, I'm going with Grant and Gilyard.
We should arrange this. Soon.If only we were competing for the Atlantic 10 two-on-two fistfight championship.
SLU, URI, VCU, Dayton, Davidson and SBU think they have the talent to make the tournament too. maybe more, and that's just in our conference.
we're in a likely 3 bid conference. 4 tops. I can't definitively say we're top 3 or 4 talent-wise. I really like our talent. but I'm not fluent enough in the comparable talent of the A10 to say we should be better than those teams. I do know we're not picked top 3 by anyone.
Correct. We do. As do other teams. You are using a list based on one guy's opinion. He also has Rhode Island's 3rd guy at 16, and VCU's at 20, and has two Davidson guys in his top five. And Dayton is picked by many to be in the top four this year. Bottom line is plenty of teams have a lot of talent. Should be a good battle for top 4.
You mean the list the UR basketball program has promoted the heck out of? Seems UR staff thinks very highly of their opinion.
VCU was picked 7th last year.
I’ll be critical of our players: I would like to see Grant shave his beard...yeah, I'm in no way being critical of our players. I just think the talk that "there's no way we shouldn't make the tournament" is a little much.
I agree, Eight, that Mooney has put together a pretty strong roster. you might be giving him too much credit though, in my opinion.
I'd like to see Matt add a beard in solidarity for Grant's beard.I’ll be critical of our players: I would like to see Grant shave his beard...
They don't play two on two in the NCAA...That may be the case. However, in a two-on-two fistfight, I'm going with Grant and Gilyard.
My short term expectations are for the team to start out pretty strong, winning 7 of their first 9 games and hopefully if this happens most of the people on this board will be giving positive encouragement to the players. Over the next 6 weeks we will have a good idea of where this team is headed.
Yes, our first 9 games are 6 home, 1 (a short bus ride) away and 2 neutral. 4 Quad 4, 4 probable Quad 3, and 1 Quad 1 game.I don't think you are being very positive. 7 out of 9 isn't anything that strong. We'll be favored in all but 2. Probably the 2 you have us losing. If we start out strong that means 8-1 or 9-0. 7-2 is the minimum.
We should and WILL be in the NCAAs. Someone wrote saying that is unfair to the players. LOL. My guess is they are probably tired of people making excuses for them and would rather have people believe they'll kick ass.
NCAA or bust
Each of us have our own expectations for this team. In looking at 3rd party forecasts for the conference, recent predictions for the Spiders are significantly better than ones that came out many months ago. Our terrible record the past 2 years is probably causing many people to hedge their expectations, which means there is a higher probability of upward than downward surprise on how the team finishes.
I hope you're right. we do have talent, more than recent Spider teams. I can't help but think though that you're looking at our talent in a vacuum without regard to the rest of the league.The reality is that we have plenty of talent to win the league and make the NCAAs.
I hope you're right. we do have talent, more than recent Spider teams. I can't help but think though that you're looking at our talent in a vacuum without regard to the rest of the league.
I think what UR80s was saying was let's have a cease-fire and give this team -- Players AND Mooney -- a chance to succeed on this year's merits, and begin from a place of support for this year's team. I'm in.
you're still talking about A10Talk's player rankings??? A10Talk judged it in comparison to everyone in league. With regard, not without and isn't that what Eight Legger was referencing.
you're still talking about A10Talk's player rankings?
I haven't seen us ranked AS A TEAM above 5th, and we've been ranked as low as 9th. that's looking at the talent of the whole team and the whole league. I hope those rankings are wrong, but I assume those guys know more about the rest of the league than I do. they think 4-8 other teams are more talented than us.
Having 2 top 10 players per A10Talk is great, but we had Golden and Gilyard last year too and lost 20.
I like our roster a lot and hope we dance, but nobody in the entire basketball prognosticating world other than a couple guys on this board thinks we're so loaded that we're some kind of lock for the NCAA tournament. there are a bunch of good teams in the A10. if we dance then we surprised some people.
you're still talking about A10Talk's player rankings?
I haven't seen us ranked AS A TEAM above 5th, and we've been ranked as low as 9th. that's looking at the talent of the whole team and the whole league. I hope those rankings are wrong, but I assume those guys know more about the rest of the league than I do. they think 4-8 other teams are more talented than us.
Having 2 top 10 players per A10Talk is great, but we had Golden and Gilyard last year too and lost 20.
I like our roster a lot and hope we dance, but nobody in the entire basketball prognosticating world other than a couple guys on this board thinks we're so loaded that we're some kind of lock for the NCAA tournament. there are a bunch of good teams in the A10. if we dance then we surprised some people.
8 years, it had better be NCAA or bust.It's because they think the coach is crap. You aren't just picked on talent. Nor finish on talent. It's a good factor of course but I'm sure you agree there are others. We also have 5 players in top 28, not just 3 in top 15. We aren't being picked higher primarily because of Mooney. Who btw says the NCAA is a reasonable expectation.
NCAA or bust
so you guys (97, GK and 8) are saying the people doing the rankings believe UR has top 3 A10 talent but because of Mooney we'll finish 5th - 9th. and you guys all think we have top 3 talent. correct?
The reality is that we have plenty of talent to win the league and make the NCAAs. And if we don't finish 1, 2 or 3 in the league this year, then there's very little reason for anyone to expect much better next year. This is the year – get it done.
I'm saying the A-10 prognosticators think we have Top 3 A 10 talent but then pick us from 5-9th and that is because of Mooney coaching ability. The talent evaluation of players is largely on their offensive abilities and everyone knows that we collectively are not very good defensively and I think that is the reason for the disparity. Coaches job to get individual players and the team as a whole to play better defense. Plus Mooney is not a good in game adjustment coach either, people that watch the A-10 regularly know all of this about Mooney.so you guys (97, GK and 8) are saying the people doing the rankings believe UR has top 3 A10 talent but because of Mooney we'll finish 5th - 9th. and you guys all think we have top 3 talent. correct?
Except for the fact that we would have everyone back, and the teams likely in front of us would lose some very key pieces. Doesn't mean I don't think dancing is very possible this year. Just means that next year should be even better.
I don't think many non-Spider fans have as strong a negative opinion of Mooney as you. Not strong enough to take top 3 talent and finish 9th anyway.I'm saying the A-10 prognosticators think we have Top 3 A 10 talent but then pick us from 5-9th and that is because of Mooney coaching ability.
Agreed. Unless their defensive skills improve, some of our players might be a little overrated as all-around players by A10Talk. defense is half the game. I'm glad we seem to be focusing on it.The talent evaluation of players is largely on their offensive abilities and everyone knows that we collectively are not very good defensively and I think that is the reason for the disparity.
If we don't finish in the top echelon this year, we won't return everyone next year. That's my point.Except for the fact that we would have everyone back, and the teams likely in front of us would lose some very key pieces. Doesn't mean I don't think dancing is very possible this year. Just means that next year should be even better.
I think they do. Or they have forgot about him. Higher opinion is probably coming in third in this race.I don't think many non-Spider fans have as strong a negative opinion of Mooney as you.
And a blood thirsty desire to win. They dont accept losing like their one time rivals.That was a mistake on the prognosticators part. It was easy to miss that one based on the step back they took in Rhoades's first year. One thing they have that we dont have is a good athletic department. It's easy to overlook that.
Wow - did not realize that message board posters had so much power. If that is the case I command the team to go undefeated and win the national championship. Surely all agree with that directive.................
Hmmm, I wonder why we have some many highly ranked players in our league, yet our ranked low as a team as to where we might finish. Maybe unsure how our coach is going to coach up all of his talent and teach them to defend and rebound properly.
And S-man, as a truther aren't you supposed to be the positive one on our program?