Your parentheses would imply women's sports with larger rosters and men's sport with smaller roster that could cause them to have more of a tilt towards female athletes?
Scrimmage
- Thread starter R&B fan
- Start date
Your parentheses would imply women's sports with larger rosters and men's sport with smaller roster that could cause them to have more of a tilt towards female athletes?
These other programs may have more numbers but is their talent level good enough to ever make a play on the field
There are only so many talented players out there that can gain admittance to UR that can truely ever hope to see a down on the field and be able to afford to pay their way
There are only so many talented players out there that can gain admittance to UR that can truely ever hope to see a down on the field and be able to afford to pay their way
I can conceptually understand the limitation of number of spots on men's teams compared to women's teams with regards to scholarships(even though I dont agree with it). But does Title IX really limit the number of walk-on players the men's programs can have? Just because maybe the women's programs dont get as many walk-ons one year compared to the next, the men's programs have to turn kids away? Last year we had 91 and in 2016 we had 95 on the roster.
Short answer, yes. Last time I studied the issue there were 3 bright line tests to show compliance with Title IX. Two very very gray and difficult to support, the third was a numbers, basically how many athletes, etc. This test has lead to the loss of many men's sports, not just at UR but at other institutions as well.
I could be mistaken, but I don't think the NCAA had any real say so in Title IX.
Not saying I don't think the NCAA should be blown up and started anew.
Institutions are responsible for complying with federal laws. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the U.S. Department of Education enforces Title IX. OCR has the authority to develop policy on the regulations it enforces. In regard to athletics programs, OCR developed an Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Interpretation that was issued December 11, 1979. The 1979 Policy Interpretation remains current policy. On April 2, 1990, OCR issued an athletics policy document called "Title IX Athletics Investigator's Manual" that has assisted athletics departments with enforcement and compliance issues with Title IX. Anyone may file an OCR complaint, and the identity of the party who files the complaint will be kept confidential.
What is the three-part test?
Answer: The regulation implementing Title IX requires institutions to provide equal athletic opportunities for members of both sexes and to effectively accommodate students’ athletic interests and abilities.1 The Department’s 1979 “Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Interpretation” (1979 Policy Interpretation),2 published on December 11, 1979, sets out a three-part test that OCR uses as part of determining whether an institution is meeting its Title IX obligations. An institution is in compliance with the three-part test if it meets any one of the following parts of the test:
(1) The number of male and female athletes is substantially proportionate to their respective enrollments; or
(2) The institution has a history and continuing practice of expanding participation opportunities responsive to the developing interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex; or
(3) The institution is fully and effectively accommodating the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex.
Answer: The regulation implementing Title IX requires institutions to provide equal athletic opportunities for members of both sexes and to effectively accommodate students’ athletic interests and abilities.1 The Department’s 1979 “Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Interpretation” (1979 Policy Interpretation),2 published on December 11, 1979, sets out a three-part test that OCR uses as part of determining whether an institution is meeting its Title IX obligations. An institution is in compliance with the three-part test if it meets any one of the following parts of the test:
(1) The number of male and female athletes is substantially proportionate to their respective enrollments; or
(2) The institution has a history and continuing practice of expanding participation opportunities responsive to the developing interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex; or
(3) The institution is fully and effectively accommodating the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex.
Do we know if UR is turning away walk-ons to the football program right now or going after fewer recruited walk-ons because of Title IX? If so did some of the women's teams lose players in the last couple years or did our student population change so that the football program had to eliminate a few spots?
Or did we just get fewer walk-ons the past couple years because of a lack of interest, most likely due to reasons previous discussed (tuition, high level of academics, etc.), or poor recruiting?
Or did we just get fewer walk-ons the past couple years because of a lack of interest, most likely due to reasons previous discussed (tuition, high level of academics, etc.), or poor recruiting?
Keep in mind that we only have somewhere between 1400-1500 male undergraduate students at UR, which is the smallest in the conference.. Even Elon or Villanova, two other private institutions in our conference have a bigger male student body.
I was able to check out a little bit of practice yesterday. It's going to be interesting to see what the depth chart for this week looks like when it comes out. We definitely have been bitten by the injury bug to some degree.
I have seen some good emphasis on Special Teams this month and really think we might end up having an excellent secondary for a couple years. Some terrific young players back there. Only a few more days until they strap on the pads and get going. I can't wait.
I hope there is no "secret stuff" going on, like our admin looking at a football de-emphasis to the Patriot or ODAC!
I don't know.....I think the anti general spidey admin is more focused on purging the school of all Virginians. /s
