ADVERTISEMENT

Roster 25-26

I'm still bothered by McGlothin and Robinson redshirting. If ever we needed true freshmen to be key pieces for us, it was last year. It's time we had a true freshman be ready and talented enough to be in the rotation. True freshman play all over the country. Maybe a versatile guy like Richardson could be that guy this year.
I bet Mooney was just begging them to suit up and telling them all about how much they would be able to contribute and how they fit perfectly into his system but they were just being stubborn and lazy and couldn't be bothered to leave the comfy confines of the bench, is that how it all played out in your head?
 
I'm still bothered by McGlothin and Robinson redshirting. If ever we needed true freshmen to be key pieces for us, it was last year. It's time we had a true freshman be ready and talented enough to be in the rotation. True freshman play all over the country. Maybe a versatile guy like Richardson could be that guy this year.
in retrospect it looks obvious. but we thought we'd be pretty good. and we had what we thought was strong depth at forward (Dusan, Roche, AP, Tanner and supposedly Beagle). there wasn't going to be a lot of available time if that group played well.

so the redshirts were offered and accepted. in today's day and age of the NIL ... I'd accept a redshirt too.

and as I think 23 has said ... don't be surprised if we offer the same deal to this year's freshmen. there are too many players for the minutes available. and freshmen who were thinking they'd get time are watching their opportunity disappear as we add guys in the portal.
 
I’m just not seeing 2 portal guys starting at guard with Moon having Tyne come off the bench. He started this year and has been here 2 years in Moonsys. I’ve alluded to Moon loyalty factor recently, and I’ll be very surprised if Tyne starts season as the 6th guy.
As much as I don’t like it, totally agree. I don’t think Tyne starts the year on the bench. Maybe ends up there. It’ll be interesting to see what happens.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zeeter
a few things have to happen for us to be a good team next season. nothing impossible or outrageous, but we weed a few of them.
to me, Tyne being really good is a big one that I can see happening. there are times where he's terrific. there's a lot there. but yeah, he needs to take a big step.
 
I bet Mooney was just begging them to suit up and telling them all about how much they would be able to contribute and how they fit perfectly into his system but they were just being stubborn and lazy and couldn't be bothered to leave the comfy confines of the bench, is that how it all played out in your head?
Last year should have been a development/transition year. Instead, Mooney mistakenly thought we would be good and rode the backs of a couple mediocre grad transfer portal guys and Roche to an 8 win season. If we are a program that says we like to develop players and wants to continue to build through the development of high school recruits, than what the eff we were doing last year. Last year will go down as one of the all time Mooney f*ck ups. Hardt and company just watching him do it the entire time, even when it was abundantly clear by the end of November that we were god awful. And then once our only decent player went down with a season ended injury, we still stayed the course. Absolute ineptitude.
 
a few things have to happen for us to be a good team next season. nothing impossible or outrageous, but we weed a few of them.
to me, Tyne being really good is a big one that I can see happening. there are times where he's terrific. there's a lot there. but yeah, he needs to take a big step.
And for 80% of the A 10 to get worse
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 8legs1dream
And for 80% of the A 10 to get worse
well that's not going to happen.

but I think Johnston and Daughtry will be very good. unlike GW3 and AP, they've already succeeded on solid teams at the D1 level.
I think AP and Tyne could easily take a step.
we're solid at the 5.
if a couple other pieces are strong, like the reshirts ... we can be really good.
or we can be really bad again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spiders4ever
a few things have to happen for us to be a good team next season. nothing impossible or outrageous, but we weed a few of them.
to me, Tyne being really good is a big one that I can see happening. there are times where he's terrific. there's a lot there. but yeah, he needs to take a big step.
Tyne needs to take a big step for sure. I wonder how much of his issues last year as PG were him needing to be better and how many were a product of having no legit offensive weapons on the floor with him to create offense.
 
Tyne needs to take a big step for sure. I wonder how much of his issues last year as PG were him needing to be better and how many were a product of having no legit offensive weapons on the floor with him to create offense.
I think Tyne's skillset is not "running an offense" in the mold of Gilyard or Jeff Myers or Ungerer. He's much more Blake Francis and Kendall Anthony in his offensive approach (but a worse shooter). When he looks to attack, he's looking for his own shot, not looking to open up the defense for someone else. He's very, very poor at pick and roll (can't get the pass away, can't shoot off the dribble, and on the drive often gets too deep and gets his shot blocked).

He seems much better when he is not the primary facilitator; I don't think it was coincidence that his improvement occurred as B. Artis was getting healthier and playing more. B. Artis was much more a facilitator.

And just to be clear -- I still like Tyne as a player and think he was one of the few guys on our team last year that had A-10 level athleticism and ability. I just don't think we can have him as the primary facilitator running the offense. That's not his strength, and we shouldn't be force-feeding him to do it just because he's short.

The guys running the offense will need to be Johnston and/or one of the freshman guards. It can't be Tyne if we're going to be good.
 
I think Tyne's skillset is not "running an offense" in the mold of Gilyard or Jeff Myers or Ungerer. He's much more Blake Francis and Kendall Anthony in his offensive approach (but a worse shooter). When he looks to attack, he's looking for his own shot, not looking to open up the defense for someone else. He's very, very poor at pick and roll (can't get the pass away, can't shoot off the dribble, and on the drive often gets too deep and gets his shot blocked).

He seems much better when he is not the primary facilitator; I don't think it was coincidence that his improvement occurred as B. Artis was getting healthier and playing more. B. Artis was much more a facilitator.

And just to be clear -- I still like Tyne as a player and think he was one of the few guys on our team last year that had A-10 level athleticism and ability. I just don't think we can have him as the primary facilitator running the offense. That's not his strength, and we shouldn't be force-feeding him to do it just because he's short.

The guys running the offense will need to be Johnston and/or one of the freshman guards. It can't be Tyne if we're going to be good.
Except Tyne can’t shoot
 
well that's not going to happen.

but I think Johnston and Daughtry will be very good. unlike GW3 and AP, they've already succeeded on solid teams at the D1 level.
I think AP and Tyne could easily take a step.
we're solid at the 5.
if a couple other pieces are strong, like the reshirts ... we can be really good.
or we can be really bad again.
.... so NOT solid at the 5
 
in retrospect it looks obvious. but we thought we'd be pretty good. and we had what we thought was strong depth at forward (Dusan, Roche, AP, Tanner and supposedly Beagle). there wasn't going to be a lot of available time if that group played well.

so the redshirts were offered and accepted. in today's day and age of the NIL ... I'd accept a redshirt too.

and as I think 23 has said ... don't be surprised if we offer the same deal to this year's freshmen. there are too many players for the minutes available. and freshmen who were thinking they'd get time are watching their opportunity disappear as we add guys in the portal.
Then why not wait on the redshirt decision? Let the freshmen practice everyday thinking they might have a chance to break into the rotation. See how things go the first 6 or 7 games of OOC.. If we look good and the depth is there at forward, fine, redshirt them. But, my goodness we were so bad during OOC play, it would have been nice to at least see if the freshman could get in there and give us a spark. If not, are they really talented enough to be factors this year?
 
Last year should have been a development/transition year. Instead, Mooney mistakenly thought we would be good and rode the backs of a couple mediocre grad transfer portal guys and Roche to an 8 win season. If we are a program that says we like to develop players and wants to continue to build through the development of high school recruits, than what the eff we were doing last year. Last year will go down as one of the all time Mooney f*ck ups. Hardt and company just watching him do it the entire time, even when it was abundantly clear by the end of November that we were god awful. And then once our only decent player went down with a season ended injury, we still stayed the course. Absolute ineptitude.
I agree and good point about the Hunt injury. That combined with us not playing well at all screams let's take a look at the freshmen. But, when they have already redshirted, they mentally are not prepared at all. Which is another reason redshirting is so stupid. How can guys mentally and even physically prepare themselves 100% knowing there is a 0% chance they will play? I wonder how much better McGlothin and Robinson might be right now if they were pushing our guys last year for playing time, trying to beat them out to be part of the rotation?
 
Am I the only one that doesn’t have a problem with the redshirt? Either the staff over valued the talent of the older guys who transferred in, saw in practice that McGlothin/Robinson weren’t college ready yet and thought it was in their best interest to redshirt and develop another year, or combination of both. Maybe there was a point during the season where the staff wanted to play McGlothin/Robinson but it became a point that it was no longer worth burning a redshirt for. As an aside, that’s another reason why I am in favor on focusing on just the conventional 13 recruits than filling out 15 now for the sake of giving the scholarship and hoping someone pans out. We only play 7-9 guys during the season. Everyone else is on the bench. Staff probably felt that they will be more ready to contribute next season and didn’t want to use a year of eligibility for a variety of reasons. Staff sees them in practice everyday, so I trust their judgement on this more and I’m sure McGlothin/Robinson also had a say in it. If they aren’t producing 5-10 minutes this year, then that’s probably not a promising outlook for their success here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiderman
Then why not wait on the redshirt decision? Let the freshmen practice everyday thinking they might have a chance to break into the rotation. See how things go the first 6 or 7 games of OOC.. If we look good and the depth is there at forward, fine, redshirt them. But, my goodness we were so bad during OOC play, it would have been nice to at least see if the freshman could get in there and give us a spark. If not, are they really talented enough to be factors this year?
my understanding is that they DO practice everyday ... and hard. they aren't slacking because they redshirt.
yes, we could have burned the shirts at any point. chose not to. whether is was discussed and turned down, we don't know.

but I agree. I personally don't offer redshirts any more. certainly not preseason. the chances of a kid who we want to keep still being here for that 5th year are slim. I wouldn't play a freshman for a garbage minute early in the season though. I'd keep the redshirt option alive. no sense screwing a kid for a couple minutes. but if he can help ... play him.
 
Not crazy about RS because want to recruit players that are ready. But still think it should be equal decision between player(family) and staff, with each voice being equal.
 
Not crazy about RS because want to recruit players that are ready. But still think it should be equal decision between player(family) and staff, with each voice being equal.
not sure why it's a discussion.
"thanks for the hundred grand. think I'm going to sit this season out".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 8legs1dream
in retrospect it looks obvious. but we thought we'd be pretty good. and we had what we thought was strong depth at forward (Dusan, Roche, AP, Tanner and supposedly Beagle). there wasn't going to be a lot of available time if that group played well.

so the redshirts were offered and accepted. in today's day and age of the NIL ... I'd accept a redshirt too.

and as I think 23 has said ... don't be surprised if we offer the same deal to this year's freshmen. there are too many players for the minutes available. and freshmen who were thinking they'd get time are watching their opportunity disappear as we add guys in the portal.
I wonder what made us thought we would be pretty good. We replaced King with Tyne. We replaced Dji with Tanner. We replaced Bigs with Dusan. We replaced Quinn with Walz as a starting center, but rotation wise, we replaced Quinn with Beagle. All of this screams we need production from our true freshmen. Too many freshmen are playing and talented enough to play right now. We don't need to be recruiting guys to redshirt them.

Also, we started unproven Tanner and had another unproven guy in AP there as well. How can our freshmen last year at least not be good enough and ready enough to compete with that? It's not like we had guys like Nick, Nate, and Tyler in front of them.
.... so NOT solid at the 5
I agree. Definitely not solid. Grant with Grace backing him up was solid. Walz with Beagle as back up is very average. Hopefully, both can improve and be much more consistent. Best case would be Walz gets it done night in and night out and plays 28+ minutes a game. Not sure we need more than 12 mpg from Beagle.
 
I think he can get to respectable on catch and shoot. He's really bad at shooting off the dribble. So if we have someone else facilitating and his shots are coming off the pass, I think that sets him and us up for more success.
But, he's 59-218 (27.1%) in his career. A good amount of those attempts were catch and shoot 3s.
 
In retrospect it definitely would have been better if McGlothlin and Robinson played last year. If you account for the injuries to Hunt, AP, GW3, etc... there would/should have been opportunities to develop and contribute on the court. With all due respect to D'Entremont who I think played well, giving 15-20 minutes a game to a graduate student walk-on instead of committed HS recruits when you're not competing for the conference top four doesn't make a lot of sense in regards to building a team towards the future. Even without the injuries I think some of the 27 minutes a game for AP and 17 minutes a game for Tanner could have been distributed to McG and JRob.

I know the coaches can get some perspective from practice. But nothing beats game experience in regards to evaluating talent.
 
Am I the only one that doesn’t have a problem with the redshirt? Either the staff over valued the talent of the older guys who transferred in, saw in practice that McGlothin/Robinson weren’t college ready yet and thought it was in their best interest to redshirt and develop another year, or combination of both. Maybe there was a point during the season where the staff wanted to play McGlothin/Robinson but it became a point that it was no longer worth burning a redshirt for. As an aside, that’s another reason why I am in favor on focusing on just the conventional 13 recruits than filling out 15 now for the sake of giving the scholarship and hoping someone pans out. We only play 7-9 guys during the season. Everyone else is on the bench. Staff probably felt that they will be more ready to contribute next season and didn’t want to use a year of eligibility for a variety of reasons. Staff sees them in practice everyday, so I trust their judgement on this more and I’m sure McGlothin/Robinson also had a say in it. If they aren’t producing 5-10 minutes this year, then that’s probably not a promising outlook for their success here.
The main problem these days is that there's a 50-50 chance or more that any given kid on the roster is going to transfer at some point. So if you redshirt a kid, you're just wasting one of the few potential years you have him. For us last year, the issue was that we sucked. So why not find out whether any of those freshmen could help us? Either that year or in the future.

The other specific issue I have with it as it relates to UR is that I don't trust the staff to evaluate talent. Mooney thought Noyes was going to be a big contributor two years ago. Instead, he ended up benched before conference play. Only one of our four transfers last year really was what they thought he'd be. I realize that this probably means it's more likely that the freshmen were no good either, especially given our recent HS recruiting disasters, but I would have rather found out anyway than still be wondering.
 
Am I the only one that doesn’t have a problem with the redshirt? Either the staff over valued the talent of the older guys who transferred in, saw in practice that McGlothin/Robinson weren’t college ready yet and thought it was in their best interest to redshirt and develop another year, or combination of both. Maybe there was a point during the season where the staff wanted to play McGlothin/Robinson but it became a point that it was no longer worth burning a redshirt for. As an aside, that’s another reason why I am in favor on focusing on just the conventional 13 recruits than filling out 15 now for the sake of giving the scholarship and hoping someone pans out. We only play 7-9 guys during the season. Everyone else is on the bench. Staff probably felt that they will be more ready to contribute next season and didn’t want to use a year of eligibility for a variety of reasons. Staff sees them in practice everyday, so I trust their judgement on this more and I’m sure McGlothin/Robinson also had a say in it. If they aren’t producing 5-10 minutes this year, then that’s probably not a promising outlook for their success here.
Another issue with the redshirts was they were our only 2 freshmen. We knew we were losing Quinn, Bigs, King, and Harris, and Dji was always gonna be a possibility. So, with only 2 freshmen coming in, we needed to recruit freshmen who were ready to play from day 1. Any player we are recruiting has likely played basketball year round for several years. Unless they are a big who maybe needs to get bigger, all of our freshmen should be college ready.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mojo-spider
my understanding is that they DO practice everyday ... and hard. they aren't slacking because they redshirt.
yes, we could have burned the shirts at any point. chose not to. whether is was discussed and turned down, we don't know.

but I agree. I personally don't offer redshirts any more. certainly not preseason. the chances of a kid who we want to keep still being here for that 5th year are slim. I wouldn't play a freshman for a garbage minute early in the season though. I'd keep the redshirt option alive. no sense screwing a kid for a couple minutes. but if he can help ... play him.
Do u think redshirts will mentally and physically bring it 100% everyday? How many times will redshirts be "running with the 1s" as our friend used to say? When are they part of any rotations in practice? When are they thinking to themselves "if I just do this or do this, I could get some minutes next game". I just think it would be incredibly hard to bring it every single day knowing there is no chance you will ever play. And, we are not talking about walk ons who bring it every day. We are talking about guys who were recruited because they have a lot of talent and guys who I would think expected to be playing and not redshirting their freshmen years.
 
In retrospect it definitely would have been better if McGlothlin and Robinson played last year. If you account for the injuries to Hunt, AP, GW3, etc... there would/should have been opportunities to develop and contribute on the court. With all due respect to D'Entremont who I think played well, giving 15-20 minutes a game to a graduate student walk-on instead of committed HS recruits when you're not competing for the conference top four doesn't make a lot of sense in regards to building a team towards the future. Even without the injuries I think some of the 27 minutes a game for AP and 17 minutes a game for Tanner could have been distributed to McG and JRob.

I know the coaches can get some perspective from practice. But nothing beats game experience in regards to evaluating talent.
This is why I am now doubting their potential some. I was excited about both at this time last year, but it should not have taken too many practices to see how slow and non athletic we were. But, our staff obviously felt Tanner and AP were so much better than our freshmen that we should redshirt them. Yikes!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeeter
Do u really think Robinson and McGlothin came here wanting to redshirt?
no, I was responding to urfan1's hypothetical where it "should be equal decision between player(family) and staff, with each voice being equal".
I would of course look to do what's best for a player, but to me it's the coach's call. if I want you to play, you play.
 
I don't think a player once he is redshirted can/is able to compete at the same level as someone who is on the active roster. There is just no way mentally you can maintain that same level of competitiveness on a daily basis knowing that you are not going to play in the games. For instance, why would you be 100% dialed into the scouting report for a game when you aren't playing.

And yes, you have to doubt their readiness, coach put them against Tanner in preseason and Tanner clearly beat them out and won the starting job. And we saw Tanner's obvious deficiencies this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VT4700
absolutely. these are competitive D1 athletes.


agreed ... they won't.


every day.
Exactly. They are competitive. And yet we redshirted them and didn’t let them compete for anything.

Why would we put redshirts in rotations every day? Isn't that less time that AP and Tanner would be in them? Like in football, QB2 doesn't get nearly the reps QB1 does.
 
I don't think a player once he is redshirted can/is able to compete at the same level as someone who is on the active roster. There is just no way mentally you can maintain that same level of competitiveness on a daily basis knowing that you are not going to play in the games. For instance, why would you be 100% dialed into the scouting report for a game when you aren't playing.

And yes, you have to doubt their readiness, coach put them against Tanner in preseason and Tanner clearly beat them out and won the starting job. And we saw Tanner's obvious deficiencies this year.
I've known a couple kids who redshirted. one was a medical redshirt. both busted their asses every day and got better.
every kid is different. I understand that. but the D1 kids I've known are a different breed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: urfan1
Exactly. They are competitive. And yet we redshirted them and didn’t let them compete for anything.
they chose the redshirt. yes, we offererd it. but they chose it. they get paid. they get better, whether for here or somewhere else. they get a jump start on college classes and can choose to graduate in 4 or 5 years. etc.


Why would we put redshirts in rotations every day? Isn't that less time that AP and Tanner would be in them? Like in football, QB2 doesn't get nearly the reps QB1 does.
because it's basketball. you practice for 2.5 hours. guys get breaks. you only play 25-30 mpg max in a real game. you want them to play hard for 2.5 hours?
 
I'm on the side that you can't be as dialed in if you are not expecting to get in games. It just sharpens your mental edge. sman, were you at the practices? Not trying to be argumentative, but it's a lot easier to say you are dialed in and busting your ass everyday, then actually doing it. I mean I am pretty damn good at letting my boss know how busy I am all the value I am bringing ever day :):):).
 
I've known a couple kids who redshirted. one was a medical redshirt. both busted their asses every day and got better.
every kid is different. I understand that. but the D1 kids I've known are a different breed.
Of course medical redshirts will bust their asses. Kind of have to when rehabbing and coming back from an injury. As for others, unless you were there with them, you wouldn't know. And, I wouldn't know for sure either, but I just find it hard to believe you would bring the same intensity every single day 100% of the time when redshirting.
 
I'm on the side that you can't be as dialed in if you are not expecting to get in games. It just sharpens your mental edge. sman, were you at the practices? Not trying to be argumentative, but it's a lot easier to say you are dialed in and busting your ass everyday, then actually doing it. I mean I am pretty damn good at letting my boss know how busy I am all the value I am bringing ever day :):):).
lol, no. obviously not at any practices. and I'm sure some kids might get down knowing they aren't going to play ... though I'd expect less "down" if the redshirt was their own decision.

I have heard some coaches say that a redshirt has been his hardest worker all year. I don't think either of us is 100% right. it'll depend on the kid. not 100% of kids can stay 100% focused and driven. but not 100% can't either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spider23
I was at practice and saw those guys playing backgammon on the sidelines every day. 😂

(That was a joke)
If I were at practice, I can't think of anything positive that could have happened here. Either Tanner and AP, guys who were young and unproven like our freshmen, clearly beat out our freshmen, or our freshmen were every bit as good as Tanner and AP and our staff inexplicably redshirted them. I just can't help but lose my excitement and hope for McGlothin and Robinson. We just won 10 games and Tanner and AP gave us pretty much nothing all year. Yet, they were clearly better than our true freshmen???
 
they chose the redshirt. yes, we offererd it. but they chose it. they get paid. they get better, whether for here or somewhere else. they get a jump start on college classes and can choose to graduate in 4 or 5 years. etc.



because it's basketball. you practice for 2.5 hours. guys get breaks. you only play 25-30 mpg max in a real game. you want them to play hard for 2.5 hours?
You keep saying they chose the redshirt. What were they supposed to do a couple weeks or whatever before the season starts? Quit? Either we made a stupid decision to redshirt them or they are less talented than AP and Tanner.
 
You keep saying they chose the redshirt. What were they supposed to do a couple weeks or whatever before the season starts? Quit? Either we made a stupid decision to redshirt them or they are less talented than AP and Tanner.
as I've said, they made the same choice I'd have made.
but to answer your question, they could have made the same decision Marcus Randolph made. "No thanks, Coach. I want to compete for time and play this year".
and then proceed to play 28 minutes while burning a year of eligibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiderstudent17
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT