Do we have connections to Riley? I don't recall seeing that...Hopefully our UR connections will play a major role for us...
You missed that Josh Duinker grew up 50 miles from him? That should be enough...Do we have connections to Riley? I don't recall seeing that...
Yes – we're recruiting him.Do we have connections to Riley? I don't recall seeing that...
Josh, a nice person, but does anyone know if he left with a good feeling about his time at UR?You missed that Josh Duinker grew up 50 miles from him? That should be enough...
Only met Josh once, but he expressed a love for UR.Josh, a nice person, but does anyone know if he left with a good feeling about his time at UR?
He never seemed to grow as a player- he was just tall. He may not be a strong supporter
to a recruit.
Good- I'd hate to think he didn't.Only met Josh once, but he expressed a love for UR.
Noted. I had interpreted that as pre-requisite connection. I guess I was hoping we weren't relying on the "we used to have another Australian player" as our other connection...Yes – we're recruiting him.
Not a good sign. Maybe Northern Iowa has a closer.I did not like the fact, he rescheduled 05 and has not set a new call in time yet.
Josh, a nice person, but does anyone know if he left with a good feeling about his time at UR?
He never seemed to grow as a player- he was just tall. He may not be a strong supporter
to a recruit.
Yeah, I think I’m looking at the collective miss more so than any individual one. I acknowledge there are conditions where we lose guys for reasons other than how our programs compares. I just think we are missing on too many of these on the whole.Agree on the closing problem with quality recruits, but losing to Boise State is just a miss, not an embarrassing travesty. Boise State has strong sports programs, an impressive national profile, and a basketball team recently on the rise.
Much like the NCAA tournamentAnd the Aussie Big man still remains an unfulfilled dream.
S-man, you have a lot of excuses for our closure problems. I’m not saying they aren’t individually valid, but when one looks at the totality of our ability to land our top few targets each year, we really are not getting the job done. I’m not saying fire mooney, there are enough people on here to do that, but we have got to improve in this regard. If we can’t sell a guy that he’ll get backup minutes at the 4 and 5 his freshman year and probably starter minutes as early as sophomore year, then the staff has got to step up their game. That is a likely scenario with our current roster makeup.sometimes tough for schools our size to recruit depth. there's no clear opening for a recruit to get time next year. that opening from a graduating senior helps.
"everyone is out there recruiting 35 guys for 3 spots"we recruited (if rivals is anywhere close to accurate) 35 guys in the class of 2016 for 3 spots. we landed Buckingham, Sherod and Golden. are you complaining that we missed on 32 guys? in what we're universally calling one of our best recruiting classes ever?
there are some great names that this board loved in those 32. Hazen, Wesson, Ford, etc. we didn't land them. we got Buckingham, Sherod and Golden. that's the nature of the business. everyone is out there recruiting 35 guys for 3 spots. you go in knowing you'll end up with a 10% success rate. you hope it's the right guys. but even when you're prioritizing them, you don't know for sure who the right guys are.
I'm not going to freak out that we don't land a guy like Abercrombie. no clue if he'll be special. pretty sure Bryce Golden would have been, but we did all we could there. I'm excited about the guys we did land the last few years though. you may not be. and that's ok.