I know this is a stretch, but suppose Hardt was actually a shrewd negotiator and gave CM 2 more years in the off-season ... while not actually increasing the buyout to get out of the contract if he wanted to.
In a reasonable negotiation process with a coach that hadn't danced in 9 years and team expected to be a monster about to lace em up, you might give those couple of years extension to convey stability to recruits ... and then ink the long-term extension after the monster team performs as expected?
Really, how does Hardt save any face whatsoever if we're headed into ANOTHER rebuild with the incumbent?
In a reasonable negotiation process with a coach that hadn't danced in 9 years and team expected to be a monster about to lace em up, you might give those couple of years extension to convey stability to recruits ... and then ink the long-term extension after the monster team performs as expected?
Really, how does Hardt save any face whatsoever if we're headed into ANOTHER rebuild with the incumbent?
Last edited: