ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Woj bomb!

If I could afford to buy us the best five college basketball players in the nation, I would do it. I’m sort of surprised some hugely wealthy donors at a random school hasn’t done this yet. $2M a year per guy for five guys. A drop in the bucket for plenty of the elites in this country. What if some rich guy who went to Winthrop or somewhere like that made that offer? There aren’t five great players who would take it?
 
If I could afford to buy us the best five college basketball players in the nation, I would do it. I’m sort of surprised some hugely wealthy donors at a random school hasn’t done this yet. $2M a year per guy for five guys. A drop in the bucket for plenty of the elites in this country. What if some rich guy who went to Winthrop or somewhere like that made that offer? There aren’t five great players who would take it?
step 1: in May, bet $100,000 on Winthrop at say 1,000:1 to win the national championship.
step 2: THEN pay $2M to the top 5 guys.
 
If I could afford to buy us the best five college basketball players in the nation, I would do it. I’m sort of surprised some hugely wealthy donors at a random school hasn’t done this yet. $2M a year per guy for five guys. A drop in the bucket for plenty of the elites in this country. What if some rich guy who went to Winthrop or somewhere like that made that offer? There aren’t five great players who would take it?
If they are great players, they will get a lot of money to play at a power school, maybe even more than 2 million.
 
Maybe. I guess my point is just that whatever the top amount is that someone is making right now, there have to be plenty of people who could afford to top that and offer it to four other guys, too. There are enough random rich people in life that there must be a bunch from small schools who could do something like that. I'm just surprised no one has tried yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spiders4ever
While there is no question that money and greed have a
good foot hold on college athletics, I wonder if there is a
group of schools that wants to start another association, where the
old rules prevail. It would be a mammoth task, but FOX started a
network, Tesla started an automotive business, Amazon started as
a bookstore, etc. With the right organization and planning, it could be done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spiders4ever
While there is no question that money and greed have a
good foot hold on college athletics, I wonder if there is a
group of schools that wants to start another association, where the
old rules prevail. It would be a mammoth task, but FOX started a
network, Tesla started an automotive business, Amazon started as
a bookstore, etc. With the right organization and planning, it could be done.
I hear you on this, I think there is that model now, and it is called the IVY league. Every year I plan to go out to a couple Yale games, maybe this will the year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiderman
It’s already started. Saw a headline about BYU wanting to throw $4.5m at the #1 prospect, no idea of its accuracy.

Bennett is correct. Players should get revenue slices. The way it all happens now and the ability to renegotiate deals, the sketchy middlemen and collectives and guys quittting a team mid season is not working tho and will blow itself up eventually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: urfan1
While there is no question that money and greed have a
good foot hold on college athletics, I wonder if there is a
group of schools that wants to start another association, where the
old rules prevail. It would be a mammoth task, but FOX started a
network, Tesla started an automotive business, Amazon started as
a bookstore, etc. With the right organization and planning, it could be done.
if that's what you're looking for it's called DIII. great seats are available cheap.
 
I hear you on this, I think there is that model now, and it is called the IVY league. Every year I plan to go out to a couple Yale games, maybe this will the year.
I feel like the Ivy is missing out on a big opportunity with this NIL money stuff. nobody has more potential NIL. if that league wanted to, they could be a power in basketball landing all the really smart great hoopers.
 
Thank goodness we have PQ and friends helping us stay competitive. But every school has PQs. If they're all willing to share it with the athletes, good for them.
This came up in a discussion the other day with a fellow Spider fan. Yes - we have PQ and probably a handful of other large donors (not many I would suspect) that are paying the large portion of the bill when it comes to NIL and paying athletes. But how long can you keep those donors - because this is a continued investment year after year, because each year - they fill up the bank account, and then it is given out to the players, and then they must fill it again. How long can you keep those donors with your current level of success?

This is not unique to UR, but take a school like Bonnies and just hiring Woj, with part of it being - he can drive up some NIL money with his connections. But then won't those donors demand results? And fast. I mean - if you keep coming back to me for 100K each year to donate to the collective, and we don't make the NCAA's in 4-5 years - will I continue to give my money?

Does this land in even greater power given to the large donors? To get rid of coaches, etc if they think success is not happening?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT