Your point regarding optimism is valid. We all need hope for the future.Like 23 said, this is the time of year to be optimistic. With that being said here are some thoughts going into next season.
1) Quinn - he developed as the year went on and if he can be a 10/5/4 guy I would consider that a transfer success.
2) Bigelow - He shot 50% from 2 last season and 26.5% from 3. The downside is he shot 113 threes vs 98 shots inside the arc. Love what he brings defensively and brings tenacity on the glass. Better shot selection and he could be a 10/7 type of guy next season.
3) Nelson - The PG in waiting ended up having a season equivalent to getting a sweater for Christmas. Even with that he was our 4th leading scorer. If the expectation on this season was “the next great Richmond PG” then I would be disappointed. If the expectation on the season was freshman PG years removed from playing competitively then I think he fared about how you’d expect him to. I’m expecting improvements in Year 2.
4) Dji - He can defend anybody on the floor and isn’t afraid to rebound on both sides of the floor. I think he replaces Goose as our best defender and I wouldn’t be surprised if he tops Goose’s points, rebounds, and assist totals in 2023 while playing fewer minutes.
5) Roche - I think we all were disappointed by the season he had, but most of that frustration was in not getting him more designed open shots. It seemed throughout most of A10 play that his shot selection was to take a contested/out of rhythm 3 just because he’s the 3 point guy. His 3 point percentage only dropped 1.2% from The Citadel, so he clearly still has it. I hope part of this offseason is working more with him on getting to those spots and getting him the ball.
6) Noyes - We really didn’t see much of him, but what we saw we liked. He looked more athletic than expected and like the potential threat from the outside that we badly need next season. At the end of the day he only took 15 shots this season, so we really don’t know what that looks like over a full season of 10-15 minutes per game. Where does he play and can he defend?
7) Walz - He was forced into some action early on but did look noticeably better in his minutes at the end of the season. Still though, nowhere near enough tape to have any idea what to expect next season. Only the work he puts in can decide that.
After this I don’t know what we’ll have. Hopefully a couple transfers to add to incoming class. Right now I’m optimistic we can get another piece or two to help out. Ideally somebody who can start, but we need players who can at least make a positive impact.
HOWEVER, unrealistic hope is one of the reasons that Mooney is still employed by Richmond. He gets a fresh start every year, regardless of what the overall performance data shows. Those of us who have been around throughout the Mooney era have been burned by false hope MANY times over the last 19-years. Every year hope springs eternal (and he gets another chance), but, most years the results (overall performance) have been underwhelming. The same issues rear their head year-after-year. That cannot be a coincidence.
If one chooses to swallow the poison pill again this year, that is the individual's prerogative. But, I think that many know how the medicine is going to taste, therefore they are hesitant to have it shoved down their throat again. Thus, apathy, mistrust, and unhappiness with the program's direction abounds. Though all have a right to choice, voluntarily taking a heavy dose of this year's pre-season poison isn't going to change the performance.
Last edited: