NCAA Coaching Carousel

[97spiderfan]

Random thought since folks keep talking about meeting with Hallock, which I know is facetious.

Would Hardt/Hallock take a meeting with season tickets holders, ex-season ticket holders, alumni about MBB? What if we banded together and presented him and Hallock with a factual look (from our vantage point) of the program. We discuss all of the facts on ad nasuem, what if they were put in a letter, requesting a meeting. Would they just ignore the letter, give us some type of form letter response, or might they hear us out?

Just asking.

 

[urfan1]

If there was a large enough group to have impact, and they respectfully requested an opportunity to explain why they have not given money, bought tickets, etc for extended period of time. They mat well get an audience, especially if agree will make gift for opportunity to be heard.

 

[spider23]

PQ says no. Take your piddling ticket contributions and get out of our face. You guys want to meet, how about give Moon half a mil each for NIL, then see what my boy could do.

 

[mojo-spider]

I think he was through 2027 when he got last year's extension which was reportedly 2 more years, so 2029?

Sigh! And I thought I could out last him. SMH…

Go Spiders!

 

[whampas]

Sigh! And I thought I could out last him. SMH…

Go Spiders!

Ha, HOPE, it does give you a reason to hang on, exercise, eat right and say your prayers at night. Thanks Mojo.

 

[97spiderfan]

If there was a large enough group to have impact, and they respectfully requested an opportunity to explain why they have not given money, bought tickets, etc for extended period of time. They mat well get an audience, especially if agree will make gift for opportunity to be heard.

Thanks Fan1, I'm a season ticket holder so I doubt they will miss that from me. Other's may have more clout/financial resources to make an impact. No offense, but I'm not giving them $$$ for a meeting.

 

[SpiderGuy]

Let's assume for a second that Hardt is not an entirely clueless maroon and that when he gave this extension, he also included a very favorable buyout clause and/or conditions that would cause the extension to fully vest only if performance standards are met, like say, winning more than eight D1 games a season.

Considering there was literally no reason to give an extension last year, I'd say this is a completely reasonable expectation. In that case, another bad season next year could be it.

I have no confidence in Hardt. Bad decision on last extension. Buyout clause or not, I’d be shocked if CM doesn’t last AT LEAST 4 more years. Not a good feel here. Odds of making another NCAA appearance in those 4 years. Maybe as in striking distance of the norm of 6 and 1/3.

 

[SpiderRick]

If there was a large enough group to have impact, and they respectfully requested an opportunity to explain why they have not given money, bought tickets, etc for extended period of time. They mat well get an audience, especially if agree will make gift for opportunity to be heard.

So you're saying that we have to pay to get an audience? What, are we seeing the King?

 

[MrTbone]

So you're saying that we have to pay to get an audience? What, are we seeing the King?

Do you know a lot of CEOs who have an open door policy to come in and complain about their product? That’s in essence what you’re suggesting…

 

[urfan1]

Go back and read the post i responded to.

 

[8legs1dream]

So you're saying that we have to pay to get an audience? What, are we seeing the King?

he's more than a simple king

 

[SpiderRick]

Do you know a lot of CEOs who have an open door policy to come in and complain about their product? That’s in essence what you’re suggesting…

Well I wasn't suggesting anything. I was just responding to "make gift for an opportunity to be heard".

A billboard is probably cheaper than that anyway...

 

[MrTbone]

Well I wasn't suggesting anything. I was just responding to "make gift for an opportunity to be heard".

A billboard is probably cheaper than that anyway...

Yeah, but also less effective. Perhaps even “anti-effective.”

 

[kneepadmckinney]

Well this is interesting... check out the name of the most likely replacement...

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-b...a-fires-coach-tobin-anderson-just-two-seasons

 

[urmite]

Well this is interesting... check out the name of the most likely replacement...

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-b...a-fires-coach-tobin-anderson-just-two-seasons

I thought we already saw that?
And I thought your link was going to be a real shocker…Mooney!

 

[kneepadmckinney]

I thought we already saw that?
And I thought your link was going to be a real shocker…Mooney!

Sorry -- I must have missed it posted elsewhere

 

[Gallipoli]

Four. His extension after the 2022 tourney was through 2027, and then they extended him again after last season. Term was not announced, but JOC said according to sources it was two more years, so 2029.

So he has 4 more seasons? Has UR ever dismissed a coach who is still under contract?

 

[Eight Legger]

Only one who got drunk and pulled over.

 

[Gallipoli]

Only one who got drunk and pulled over.

Latrelle Scott? I thought he resigned voluntarily. And there was no other?

 

[MrTbone]

Latrelle Scott? I thought he resigned voluntarily. And there was no other?

We are not in the habit of firing coaches under contract. There are limited examples and almost none in the revenue generating sports.

 

[8legs1dream]

We dont fire coaches under contract and we dont stop extending Mooney. This is the way.

#DecadesOfMooney

 

[SpiderGuy]

We dont fire coaches under contract and we dont stop extending Mooney. This is the way.

#DecadesOfMooney

Kind of funny in that at an institution of higher learning our “decision makers” don’t ever learn.

 

[Eight Legger]

Latrelle Scott? I thought he resigned voluntarily. And there was no other?

Sure, he "voluntarily" resigned. That's it. Also, he definitely didn't ever have a sidepiece attending other UR sporting events with him.