Pull a Michael Scott and put some caprese salad in Mooney’s desk drawerLet's just frame Mooney as a drug dealer. Surely that would get him fired.
Pull a Michael Scott and put some caprese salad in Mooney’s desk drawerLet's just frame Mooney as a drug dealer. Surely that would get him fired.
So, nothing negative toward Buck for letting his teammates down?
We don't know the time line, what appeals had to be completed, who else had to be notified before going public, and on and on. The 'whispers' are really kind of believable, for example; say I'm an employee who knows he messed up and know I'm about to be fired, so for my own self esteem I tell people 'I hate this job', or 'I hate my boss' so I'm leaving....Some things just don't add up right to me.
There have been whispers and more about Buck for several months now, either that he wanted to leave or that he was having some issues.
If Buck got his third-strike-and-you're-out results a few weeks ago and then was trying to ask for a release, why would Mooney come out and say adamantly after Fore left that there would be no more attrition?
Did whatever prompted Buck's dismissal just happen this week? That seems difficult for me to believe, based on all the whispers, some tweets and some other info I've been told.
In short, it seems likely that Mooney knew there would be more attrition at the time he said there wouldn't be – whether Buck was planning to leave on his own or be kicked out. Of course I could be wrong, but the evidence points the other direction.
To a lesser extent, if it was known in the athletic department earlier than Monday or Tuesday that Buck was going to be dismissed – as I suspect it was – why in the hell did no one tell the sports information people so they wouldn't post his sophomore highlight video they way they did? It just looks awful and feels like a completely tone deaf situation all around – at best.
Nancy LiebermanPoints to a huge breakdown in what the players expect when recruited and what the reality is after recruitment. Who is going to fix that?
I'm disappointed in Buck but something about this whole situation is not adding up either. Unless that is clarified, Buck is a player who was our heart and soul and gave 110% all of the time.
What about Khwan, Paul, and Solly? They all left early as well for their own reasons, none of which seem to reflect on the coach or the overall state of the program in your eyes. If it was just Buck than you can look at this in isolation but it is about 1/3 of the team that has now bailed this year.
Nancy Lieberman
And do have faith in CM making that turn around or r u suggesting a change in coaching as the quick turnaround.We don't know the time line, what appeals had to be completed, who else had to be notified before going public, and on and on. The 'whispers' are really kind of believable, for example; say I'm an employee who knows he messed up and know I'm about to be fired, so for my own self esteem I tell people 'I hate this job', or 'I hate my boss' so I'm leaving....
For me none of this matters in the long run... a quick, dramatic program turn around is what is required.
Name one top program where a dumpster fire like ours has happened, and as an outsider, you didnt immediately point the finger at the coach? Excuses excuses ... its Mooney's damn team for 13 years and this is where he has brought it. So its no ones fault? Just unlucky circumstances? Come on.Kwan is the most perplexing to me. That stings the most. His leaving lands squarely at Mooney’s feet. You shouldn’t have a rising 5th year senior leader leave your squad.
Solly is strange but if he doesn’t buy in or he demands the team to be built around him, or whatever his reasoning for quitting mid season, then ok. I’d like to know more about what happened, seeing he was around the program for over a year, you would’ve thought he would know what to expect from the program/how he was going to be used. However, I don’t put his mal-content squarely on Mooney’s shoulders. Yes, he should work to keep players happy, but at the same time, someone who is willing to quit on his team mid season, at least to me, is a bit of a diva and not someone who was ever going to buy in.
PF didn’t leave the program, he was shown the door. And he had little to no impact last season, and when he was on the floor, was a liability. I know others have pined for more playing time for him, I still haven’t seen anything that warrants it (and it seems the coaches agree, who see him far more regularly).
Buck sealed his own fate, and was dismissed. I wish something was done to help him, and for all we know, measures were taken to help him, or he refused help, or yes, it is possible Mooney and the coaches completely ignored the issue. I just find it hard to believe nothing was done after he was suspended (presumably for a related offense) mid season.
Long story short, I see 1 of 4 on Mooney. There is plenty to throw at Mooney in terms of his failures, but that doesn’t mean everything and anything that happens is completely his fault. And yes, I would like to see the 3 spots filled soon and with quality players.
Not really. Khwan left on good terms and has only said positive things about coaches and teammates, and Buck, and only Buck, caused his own problems.
The chemistry of last year's team was really good. I thought the coaches and team did a really good job of shaking off the tough out of conference start, and staying together and playing much better during the A-10 season. The previous season, with TJ and ShawnDre as leaders, we seemed together as well. I see no evidence of any cultural problem.
Well, Nancy will have access to some good sources. As you know, she is the coach of "Power" of the Big3 League. They recently drafted Glen "Big Baby" Davis - he apparently has a new occupation since leaving the NBA:Thanks for bringing a big smile - it will either be her or perhaps one of us on the message board who have all the answers. I'd be up for giving it a shot or better yet how about Dick Tarrant who a Google search shows as a picture of Chuck Boone. (You may want to try that before they wise up and change the picture)
Read it and weep (like literally cry at what the program has become)
"the Spiders have lost nine scholarship players with eligibility remaining since the conclusion of the 2014-15 season.
Those nine break down this way: one dismissed (Buckingham), two graduate transfers (guard Khwan Fore, forward Alonzo Nelson-Ododa), one who quit (forward Solly Stansbury), one graduating who will skip his final season of eligibility (forward Paul Friendshuh), and four who transferred from UR (guard Jesse Pistokache, guard Kadeem Smithen, forward KoVien Dominaus, forward Chandler Diekvoss)."
Name one top program where a dumpster fire like ours has happened, and as an outsider, you didnt immediately point the finger at the coach? Excuses excuses ... its Mooney's damn team for 13 years and this is where he has brought it. So its no ones fault? Just unlucky circumstances? Come on.
Name one top program where a dumpster fire like ours has happened, and as an outsider, you didnt immediately point the finger at the coach? Excuses excuses ... its Mooney's damn team for 13 years and this is where he has brought it. So its no ones fault? Just unlucky circumstances? Come on.
Lefty was rail roaded -and used as a scapegoat.If Lefty got canned because his players were using drugs, then why can't Mooney be sacked for the same reason? Coaches bear some responsibility for what their players do off the court.
Vapes are terrible for you because they contain propeline glycol*.
Dayton isn't bashing the coach because he has only been there for one year. Mooney has been here for 13 years and not too much good has happened.When you say dumpster fire, do you mean players leaving? If so, I have a few points:
Transferring is not a Richmond problem/trend, it is a NCAA men’s basketball problem. This article states that 40% of players leave their first school by the end of their sophomore year: http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/tracking-transfer-division-i-men-s-basketball
To be honest, that’s far higher than I expected to find.
Define top program? Because the dukes/Kentucky’s of the world obviously lose players for very different reasons. But looking at equivalent/better programs in our own conference, Dayton has had 5 players transfer this year. I’m not tuned into Dayton, but I don’t think they’re solely blaming the coach.
And yes, the state of the program lies at Mooney’s feet, for sure. But my blame for Mooney doesn’t stem from individuals leaving for whatever reason, especially not players who didn’t fit/weren’t good enough/were dismissed for disciplinary reasons. I think blame falls on him for not having a plan/answer for when it does happen, because as I mentioned above, fluidity of a roster is now common place in college basketball.
Yes and no. Other schools have players transferring because they already have too many good players ahead of them. Here we have players transfer because they aren't good enough to play Division I basketball. I agree that the local media (mostly O'Connor) has done a poor job explaining the real issue. It's not that we've had a lot of players leave, it's that we signed so many bad players in the first place.Unfortunately in today's basketball landscape 9 transfers in 4 seasons is less than average. Of course we only had 6 transfers, 1 dismissal, 1 graduation, and 1 quit, but 9 early departures in and of itself is not an indication of anything out of the norm. In fact it is less than normal. This is only perceived as a problem when it is coupled with an inability to maintain a competitive roster which leads to a lack of success on the court. However the attrition rate in and of itself is not what has lead to the inability to maintain a competitive roster. Plenty of schools are able to maintain competitive rosters with similar or higher attrition rates.
Dayton isn't bashing the coach because he has only been there for one year. Mooney has been here for 13 years and not too much good has happened.
Yes and no. Other schools have players transferring because they already have too many good players ahead of them. Here we have players transfer because they aren't good enough to play Division I basketball. I agree that the local media (mostly O'Connor) has done a poor job explaining the real issue. It's not that we've had a lot of players leave, it's that we signed so many bad players in the first place.
In most cases, we were glad to see them leave – O'Connor has made it sound as if we would have been better if they stayed, which of course is wrong. But had we recruited properly, we wouldn't have had as many guys leave because they would have been good enough to play and contribute.
Same as addiction ? Have to hit "rock bottom" before any change is made ?
How classy! Why would anyone want to frame an innocent person? To even consider that is disgusting.
Yes and no. Other schools have players transferring because they already have too many good players ahead of them. Here we have players transfer because they aren't good enough to play Division I basketball. I agree that the local media (mostly O'Connor) has done a poor job explaining the real issue. It's not that we've had a lot of players leave, it's that we signed so many bad players in the first place.
In most cases, we were glad to see them leave – O'Connor has made it sound as if we would have been better if they stayed, which of course is wrong. But had we recruited properly, we wouldn't have had as many guys leave because they would have been good enough to play and contribute.
Who would you blame for the state of the basketball program? Mooney is the guy in charge. If 12 and 20 is the norm, we should aspire to be abnormal.So, with other schools, all of their transfers were good players, but transferred because the players in front of them are too good, but with us, and, only us, I guess, it is only because the players transferring were not good? You need to do more research. Our transfers are very similar to a high majority of other transfers: a combination of the actual players not being good enough and also having better players in front of them.
It sounds like you expect all of our recruits to be quality players who in your mind should all get playing time. No one's roster is like that, and all rosters have guys at the end of the bench who go games without playing. So, I again ask. Why expect us to be different than the other 300+ teams out there?
Many of the ones who do not play end up transferring and trying their luck elsewhere. It happens everywhere, at high majors, mid majors, and the lower conferences. Why, other than your continuous need to blame Mooney for this, are you are acting like we are the exception when we are very much the norm?
Yes, we can agree transfers are rampant in college basketball. As usual, Mooney ignored how many were taking advantage of this trend. Hell, Tarrant and Beilein were playing this game decades back. But no, Mooney if above it. He finally brought in a good transfer in TJ. 13 years and how many good transfers in have we had? Just terrible roster management since 2011. Fore and Buck leaving just highlights that we don't have viable options to fill in and supplement the roster. Never any competition on the roster last 4-5 years.
Who would you blame for the state of the basketball program? Mooney is the guy in charge. If 12 and 20 is the norm, we should aspire to be abnormal.