ADVERTISEMENT

AJ Lopez - Transfer Commit

can't argue with the stats, but shoots 3's from his chin. little concerned that the move up to the A10 might find him with less space to shoot. but good looking player.

Maine weirdly doesn't list weight on their roster.
 
$S
Too bad no package deal w Maine coach. That would have been my first choice of a transfer from Maine. But I guess Lopez will have to do.
This is a prime example of how this board continues with its negativity. We’re discussing a good player that
Mooney is bringing into the system, and many of us are pleased. But then there is always one that has to
throw in a negative. It’s a shame that some of us that want to enjoy the good moments aren’t allowed to
without negative Nelly throwing in their negative remarks
 
I said I wanted a shooter with size. 6'5 with 56 made 3s at 40.3%. Nice! I also like that he was 101-115 at the FT line last year. Not only is the 87.8% impressive, so is the volume. He makes 3s, gets to the line, and makes FTs.

We will see if he can be as productive in the A-10. I guess some on here will say he moved down a level since Maine had a better NET than us last year. Only 1 team in their conference had a higher NET than Maine's 205 NET, but if the guy can play, he can play. The minutes are definitely there for someone his size to grab. I like the addition.
 
I said I wanted a shooter with size. 6'5 with 56 made 3s at 40.3%. Nice! I also like that he was 101-115 at the FT line last year. Not only is the 87.8% impressive, so is the volume. He makes 3s, gets to the line, and makes FTs.

We will see if he can be as productive in the A-10. I guess some on here will say he moved down a level since Maine had a better NET than us last year. Only 1 team in their conference had a higher NET than Maine's 205 NET, but if the guy can play, he can play. The minutes are definitely there for someone his size to grab. I like the addition.
I like his quick release, his catch and shoot, ability to create, only wish his release was higher.
 
$S

This is a prime example of how this board continues with its negativity. We’re discussing a good player that
Mooney is bringing into the system, and many of us are pleased. But then there is always one that has to
throw in a negative. It’s a shame that some of us that want to enjoy the good moments aren’t allowed to
without negative Nelly throwing in their negative remarks

All good nobody is stopping u or anyone from your opinions nor saying all the nice things u want.

I happen to kinda like the Maine coach and would take him over Mooney. truth.

And most of us r burned out on Mooney & his 20 years of not meeting expectations & lack of accountability. So if it’s an example - tho a pretty tame one imo & these r also 1 year pros coming in - it can’t be a surprise when the Mooney malaise hangs over everything w the program.

I’ll add positives…

I hope Lopez leads us to the Final Four

Maine had better NET but I agree he transferred UP. Positive

I’ve been in favor of using extra ships since we’ve known about the new rules. Many did not want more than 13 ships used & found more than 13 to be a negative. Didn’t want this or any player. I felt opposite. Moon seemingly agrees. Positive.

U don’t even have a Spiders avatar! I do. Me positive u negative.
 
I like his quick release, his catch and shoot, ability to create, only wish his release was higher.
can't argue with the stats, but shoots 3's from his chin. little concerned that the move up to the A10 might find him with less space to shoot. but good looking player.

Maine weirdly doesn't list weight on their roster.
From the
I like his quick release, his catch and shoot, ability to create, only wish his release was higher.
from what I see
can't argue with the stats, but shoots 3's from his chin. little concerned that the move up to the A10 might find him with less space to shoot. but good looking player.

Maine weirdly doesn't list weight on their roster.
from what I see in his highlights, his release point in catch and shoot is around him chin, but when he shoots off the dribble it much higher and around his forehead, I don’t think that it will affect him that much. Also worth noting that he played against 3 A10 teams this last season (Us, Fordam, and Duquesne). In these games he scored 19, 24 and 17. I like this addition to the squad. He’s athletic, good shoot the 3 and is an efficient scorer. I assume he starts at the 3, I think this team is better than last years (not saying much), this years team success rides on the redshirt freshmen and the development of players like Tanner and Tyne. We’ll see how it goes this year.
 
If this means Tanner and AP are not starting, I am all on board:) Seriously, he looks like a player, at least offensively. Whether, he can defend or not and understand Mooney's complex defensive schemes quickly or not is another question that we will have to wait until the season. But we have a new starter at the 3 and he looks to be a significant upgrade from our current roster situation.
 
$S

This is a prime example of how this board continues with its negativity. We’re discussing a good player that
Mooney is bringing into the system, and many of us are pleased. But then there is always one that has to
throw in a negative. It’s a shame that some of us that want to enjoy the good moments aren’t allowed to
without negative Nelly throwing in their negative remarks
All I can say is that closed mouths doesn’t get fed, keep your negative thoughts and opinions to yourself!!
 
$S

This is a prime example of how this board continues with its negativity. We’re discussing a good player that
Mooney is bringing into the system, and many of us are pleased. But then there is always one that has to
throw in a negative. It’s a shame that some of us that want to enjoy the good moments aren’t allowed to
without negative Nelly throwing in their negative remarks
Good moments are in November-March, Annap. Kid looks he could help us. But we finished 258 in the NET last year and we have major roster issues that one pretty good players from Maine is not going to fix. I do think we are better today than yesterday but we have dug ourselves quite a large hole to crawl out of.
 
Will be interesting to see not only who starts, but who doesn't even make the rotation. I don't see enough minutes out there to play more than 4, if even that many, of Lopez, Daughtry, Tanner, AP, McGlothin and Robinson.
Yeah, I don't think you bring in a transfer and not have him in the rotation. All of them will play.
We have 9 guys in the junior and senior classes. That's what I assume our rotation will be.
Ideally one or two of the youngsters push for time.

I think in general with all the transferring and the expanded rosters you'll see mostly older lineups, fewer freshmen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gcarter52
Yeah, I don't think you bring in a transfer and not have him in the rotation. All of them will play.
We have 9 guys in the junior and senior classes. That's what I assume our rotation will be.
Ideally one or two of the youngsters push for time.

I think in general with all the transferring and the expanded rosters you'll see mostly older lineups, fewer freshmen.
We brought in GW3 and he wasn't in the rotation. I think Daughtry is all set. Who knows about the other 5 I mentioned? Hopefully, Lopez can have similar success here, but he, Tanner and AP are still question marks. No reason why McGlothin and Robinson can't beat them out if they are good enough, but I do have concerns that they couldn’t beat them out last year. If they can't get minutes this year, their 2nd years in the system, I don't see them ever getting minutes here. Especially when considering we don't have proven, all conference type players in front of them. Will be interesting to see how it plays out. Guards seem set with Johnston, Thomas, and Tyne getting time, and Walz and Beagle will obviously get minutes. So, the wing/forward spot is the interesting one.
 
Last edited:
anything is possible once they're all in the gym. I'm saying the INTENT is to have all the incoming transfers in the rotation.
and I think the intent last season was to play GW3 too. but then either injury slowed him early or he just didn't earn the time.
 
anything is possible once they're all in the gym. I'm saying the INTENT is to have all the incoming transfers in the rotation.
and I think the intent last season was to play GW3 too. but then either injury slowed him early or he just didn't earn the time.
Agree. You definitely bring transfers in with the idea they will be rotation guys. But, you said you assume we have our 9 man rotation with the juniors and seniors. So, with all 4 incoming transfers getting minutes this year, what have Tanner and AP done to assume anything with them?

Tanner averaged 3.6 ppg in 17.2 mpg, shooting only 29.8% from 3, with more turnovers than assists, and only got to the FT line 18 times all year. This is why I will continue to say why the heck did McGlothin and Robinson redshirt when this is the production we got in 17 mpg from a guy in front of them?

AP averaged 5.4 ppg in 26.6 mpg, shooting only 25.9% from 3, and only got to the line 12 times. He did average 5.2 rpg, and had more assists than turnovers, so that is good, but we have to get better production than what these guys gave us.

I would include Tyne with them based on his below average numbers, but he is a rotation guy unless a true freshman beats him out. We only have Johnston, Thomas, and Tyne as backcourt guys with experience right now. Maybe a true freshman can sneak in there and beat Tyne or Thomas out, but I would say it is much more likely McGlothin or Robinson finds minutes, unless they just can't play at this level, and the junior/senior who might be out of the rotation could be Tanner.
 
someone can beat them out, but underclassmen getting 17 and 26 mpg don't normally drop out of the rotation the next year ... especially by freshmen.

they need to play better but I'm going to assume they're in the rotation.
 
someone can beat them out, but underclassmen getting 17 and 26 mpg don't normally drop out of the rotation the next year ... especially by freshmen.

they need to play better but I'm going to assume they're in the rotation.
They played those minutes because we had no one else. This year, if Robinson and McGlothin can't beat them out or at least play similar minutes in OOC play to see who is better, they need to just transfer. Being buried in the rotation behind Tanner and AP your 2nd year in the system would be very telling. I do think AP showed more than Tanner last year and Tanner needs to improve dramatically IMO to justify any time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT