I noticed something on pages 68-69 of our record book
https://s3.amazonaws.com/sidearm.si...uments/2017/10/13/2017_18_MBB_Record_Book.pdf
And began to wonder if it may have had an impact on the school's view of Mooney's performance
Against AP Top 25 teams
Coach/Wins/Losses/ %/Seasons
Les Hooker 4-18 0.182 11
Lew Mills 1-13 0.071 11
Carl Sloane 0-5 0.000 4
Dick Tarrant 5-14 0.263 12
Bill Dooley 0-6 0.000 4
John Beilein 2-6 0.250 5
Jerry Wainwright 4-9 0.308 3
Chris Mooney 13-18 0.419 12
Mooney had the highest winning percentage even after an 0-4 start his first season.
But it wasn't effective for the team, it would just randomly show up often enough to make it look good.
Tarrant definitely made is 5 count.3 vs Georgia Tech, his first game against Wake, and Syracuse in the NCAA...
Yes, we as fans have our negatives before this year. 55% overall winning percentage, Lack of NCAAs...
The school may have looked at the above, plus 2 below .500 seasons followed by 10 straight .500 or better seasons and thought "stay the course".
While both of the negatives (particularly the NCAA record) are truly frustrating, my own definition of success is different from either of those.
What is your record and percentage of seasons that you had twice (or more) as many wins as losses by Selection Sunday?
2011, you seem to have an elaborate database, how do our last 5 coaches stand using that criteria.
As I said that would be my evaluation of a coach's performance.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/sidearm.si...uments/2017/10/13/2017_18_MBB_Record_Book.pdf
And began to wonder if it may have had an impact on the school's view of Mooney's performance
Against AP Top 25 teams
Coach/Wins/Losses/ %/Seasons
Les Hooker 4-18 0.182 11
Lew Mills 1-13 0.071 11
Carl Sloane 0-5 0.000 4
Dick Tarrant 5-14 0.263 12
Bill Dooley 0-6 0.000 4
John Beilein 2-6 0.250 5
Jerry Wainwright 4-9 0.308 3
Chris Mooney 13-18 0.419 12
Mooney had the highest winning percentage even after an 0-4 start his first season.
But it wasn't effective for the team, it would just randomly show up often enough to make it look good.
Tarrant definitely made is 5 count.3 vs Georgia Tech, his first game against Wake, and Syracuse in the NCAA...
Yes, we as fans have our negatives before this year. 55% overall winning percentage, Lack of NCAAs...
The school may have looked at the above, plus 2 below .500 seasons followed by 10 straight .500 or better seasons and thought "stay the course".
While both of the negatives (particularly the NCAA record) are truly frustrating, my own definition of success is different from either of those.
What is your record and percentage of seasons that you had twice (or more) as many wins as losses by Selection Sunday?
2011, you seem to have an elaborate database, how do our last 5 coaches stand using that criteria.
As I said that would be my evaluation of a coach's performance.