Why would they even consider it? What is the tie-in with Cleveland or Ohio?Cleveland Indians’ New Name odds
- Spiders 3/1
- Naps 4/1
- Guardians 5/1
- Buckeyes 6/1
- Dobys 7/1
- Wild Things 8/1
- Blue Sox 9/1
- Rocks 10/1
- Cuyahogas 15/1
- Crows 20/1
- Rockers 20/1
- Unions 25/1
- Fellers 33/1
- Great Lakers 40/1
Well I’m sure if they tried to call themselves the Richmond Spiders, we could stop them. But beyond that, not possible. Just like there are tons of teams that have the same nickname as other teams.Not a businessman, but we don't have a copyright on the name?
We have a trademark on the "Spiders" name related to "Entertainment services, namely conducting athletic events" as well as a couple others covering various pieces of apparel and other products.
On the main one, we claimed a "first use in commerce" date of May 31, 1897...lol.
Yes, about a decade ago they complained about our mascot named Spidey, for which they've had a trademark since 1975. That's how we ended up with WebstUR.Didnt we have some legal issue at some point with Marvel and Spider-Man?
Yes, about a decade ago they complained about our mascot named Spidey, for which they've had a trademark since 1975. That's how we ended up with WebstUR.
Yep, that one was about the spider logo. The result was that any time we use it on merchandise, it has to be accompanied by “Richmond” or “UR”...can’t use just the bare spider.Also had to fight Spyder ski wear
Agreed, you can jam to it and you can throw them. And last time, I checked no one was offended by a rock.Cleveland Rocks. It works on many levels.
10000% this. Spyder didn't even exist when we were using our logo and they spell their name differently. Like what in the actual F were we doing in this case?? We should have come out of there owning the company if anything, not being forced into some terrible requirement the way we were. I hope we got our money back. And I will never buy Spyder gear of any type. To top it all off, they don't have to write Spyder next to their spider. Totally absurd.I just hope we don't have the same lawyers that have handled our prior cases. Talk about rolling over. Maybe they graduated from VCU Law. To not be able to buy a hat with just the spider logo on the front (Richmond could be spelled out on back bottom of hat) annoys the crap out of me. So priority #1...new lawyers. And our school needs to be proactive about it not reactive.
10000% this. Spyder didn't even exist when we were using our logo and they spell their name differently. Like what in the actual F were we doing in this case?? We should have come out of there owning the company if anything, not being forced into some terrible requirement the way we were. I hope we got our money back. And I will never buy Spyder gear of any type. To top it all off, they don't have to write Spyder next to their spider. Totally absurd.
10000% this. Spyder didn't even exist when we were using our logo and they spell their name differently. Like what in the actual F were we doing in this case?? We should have come out of there owning the company if anything, not being forced into some terrible requirement the way we were. I hope we got our money back. And I will never buy Spyder gear of any type. To top it all off, they don't have to write Spyder next to their spider. Totally absurd.
For now, I'm going to start a new school called Richmond University and sue UR for name infringement. Later suckers! I'm about to be rich!
Agreed, you can jam to it and you can throw them. And last time, I checked no one was offended by a rock.
why hold it against Spyder? they were smart ... and they make great ski wear. I had my kids in Spyder gear for many years. felt I had them representing the Spiders, even if they weren't.And I will never buy Spyder gear of any type.
I have a Spyder ski jacket. It is great and everyone thinks it is a UR jacket anyway. It is way more high quality than any branded stuff with UR on it. I call it a win-win.why hold it against Spyder? they were smart ... and they make great ski wear. I had my kids in Spyder gear for many years. felt I had them representing the Spiders, even if they weren't.
I'm guessing they trademarked that logo. if the suit didn't have merit, blame the judge. or our lawyers.I mean, I do. They were really concerned that people were going to get confused between a university that had been using a spider logo and was CALLED THE SPIDERS for like 100 years before their one-man company existed and their ski company that spells its name differently? Like, what in the world? This was worth bringing a lawsuit against a university? Really??
"Oh, sh!t, I meant to buy a pair of Spyder ski pants but I accidentally ended up buying a Richmond Spiders tennis t-shirt from urspidershop.com!"
Wait...is that Haji from Johnny Angel?
Quest?Wait...is that Haji from Johnny Angel?
One link then I agree with GK. We need to get back to the spiders instead of jokes...How about the Cleveland Honkies? I'd bet the white guys on the team would just laugh about it and not cry racism. Before the Braves were in Atlanta, they had a minor league team called the Atlanta Crackers. Nobody complained....
How would you feel if they renamed themselves the Cleveland Pigs and used police as a caricature?How about the Cleveland Honkies? I'd bet the white guys on the team would just laugh about it and not cry racism. Before the Braves were in Atlanta, they had a minor league team called the Atlanta Crackers. Nobody complained....